Login / Manage membership        Not receiving GetUp emails? Join now to receive updates There are currently 382248 members.

Sending in the troops...


Posted on the campaign blog , June 26th, 2007
The widespread abuse of Indigenous Australians should deeply worry us all. So too should the Federal Government’s response to it.

There is no doubt that urgent action is needed to combat child abuse and sexual assault in Indigenous communities, and that in fact such action is long overdue. That, indeed, is one source of criticism of the Federal Government’s plan – John Howard has known about the shocking state of this issue for all 11 of his years in power, but has only now decided to declare it a ‘national crisis’ and to dramatically intervene.

It is always dangerous to allege political motives for this most emotive of issues, and the Prime Minister should be rightly commended for his (albeit overdue) attention on this emergency. But criticism of his plan is not an endorsement of welfare, bureaucracy or ineffective policy, as much as rhetoric and loud overtures on the issue does not excuse bad policy. We want the crisis fixed, and we should use this opportunity to focus on what the real solutions to the national Indigenous health crisis are, from which real benefits will flow.

The nature of John Howard’s intervention has caused further widespread criticism, as has his failure to consult with either the Northern Territory Government, whose laws are being overridden, or Indigenous communities, whose lives are being affected and rights significantly eroded.

Many have attributed the high level of scepticism regarding the Prime Minister’s plan to a natural suspicion of his motives, based on 11 years of disastrous policies and willful neglect. Regardless of the PM’s motives however, a close inspection of the plan reveals some very worrying features and a perplexing attitude towards the issue.

Disturbingly paternalistic and unnecessarily heavy-handed, the plan involves sending Australian Federal Police and Australian Defence Force troops into Indigenous communities in the NT to restore law and order. The police are trained in neither NT laws nor cultural sensitivities, and their deployment is for many reasons a step back towards colonial days.

The plan also involves compulsory invasive medical examinations of children under 16, again by professionals largely untrained in cultural issues, and unrealistic given the chronically under-funded and under-resourced present health infrastructure in the Territory.

The banning of alcohol and pornography, regardless of the abject failure of prohibition elsewhere, is equally unrealistic, and suggests to the rest of Australia that this child abuse is perpetrated entirely by Aboriginal men. That is simply not the case, as the report Little Children are Sacred found. It further highlights the flawed logic in the Government’s approach in creating an Australian apartheid, where two communities live segregated under different laws.

Similarly, it is difficult to see how changing the nature of the land tenure in Indigenous communities and quarantining 50% of welfare payments will in any way help reduce the level of abuse of the children in these communities.

In reality, these are complex issues that demand a comprehensive response that cannot be administered effectively by these short-term stopgap measures. The reasons at the heart of the substance abuse and addiction must be addressed. Where are the sweeping reforms to the ‘crisis’ in education, health and housing that has lead to this ‘national emergency’? Where are the shelters and rehabilitation programs for those affected? The real tragedy is that the plan to address the overall health crisis has been written and costed, but the Federal Government refuses to fund and implement the recommendations.

Many success stories abound in Aboriginal health; the missing ingredient in their widespread implementation has been a lack of funding. The Federal Government knows the shortfall - $460 million in increased annual funding will close the health gap – but has granted only an extra $30 million per annum for Indigenous health programs Australia wide in this year’s budget, despite an obscene budget surplus, and over 40,000 signatures on our petition calling for a greater commitment.

Now that the Government has provided a national response to an Indigenous issue of urgent importance, we cannot unquestioningly accept that this commitment will last, or indeed be effective at all. The considered response suggests, in fact, that these changes will do more harm than good. The issue of child abuse and sexual assault in Indigenous communities is entwined in these broader social issues that John Howard continues to ignore. These draconian and alarmist policies will achieve little more than entrench a great divide between the rest of Australia and these Indigenous communities that have suffered in unimaginable conditions while their government looked the other way, only to have them send in the troops to police bad policy, under a different set of rules than the rest of Australia.

This issue has proved to be highly divisive, and all different views need to be acknowledged to allow a greater understanding for the Australian community. Please make your comments below, and if you haven’t already join our campaign to demand an appropriate response to the Indigenous health crisis here.


272 comments

Leave Your Comment

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Campaign Blogs
This blog post is from the Campaign Close the Gap.
Blog Tools

Featured Articles


Latest Comments
  • DD on The Latest
    I'll leave you to
    research the rest of
    your posted nonsense
    as a holiday
    project, Lynda A
    hint...
  • DD on The Latest
    You said "I actually
    lied a little
    there." Indeed you
    did Lynda Let us at
    least agree on
    something
  • DD on The Latest
    You say that the
    scientific claim
    that increasing CO2
    levels causes
    temperature change
    is a lie -...
  • DD on The Latest
    Here are some simple
    facts on mosquitos:
    "Mosquitoes, like
    most insects, are
    cold blooded...

Join Getup

Whether it is signing a petition, engaging with the media, attending an event or helping to get a television ad on the air, you'll only ever asked to take targeted, coordinated and strategic action. Taking action is optional, convenient and proven to work!
Join Now.

Subscribe!



David Ramos
June 26th, 2007

Just when you thought this Government couldn't surprise you anymore....

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Joan Plank
June 26th, 2007

This is a very real threat to all our lives. First they take the rights away from the aborigines. Next ???
Sending in the army to do what? Shoot all males in case they are child molestors? Shoot any person who resists? Round up the children and take them away? What the hell is going on? Does the army train it's soldiers how to delicately handle the frightened, traumatised victims of child abuse? This must become the number one issue for Get Up right away - climate change can wait. We must act now. But how?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Phil Hazell
June 26th, 2007

Has anyone seen anything in the Australian media's reporting of this issue about the FACT that they intend to extend this to ALL welfare recipients?

It has been reported in two separate articles in the NZ Herald www.nzherald.co.nz (Radical plan gathers speed: 26/06/2007) and (Howard adopts new hardline: 23/06/2007) that the Federal Government intends to extend this to all recipients of welfare.

Why haven't the Australian media reported this? I am sure that the Australian public at large might be a little more concerned about the issue if they knew they were also in the sights of this invasive policy!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Susan Fullagar
June 26th, 2007

I thought to begin my comments with "I find it hard to believe..." and regret that I have reached the point where I am no longer surprised about the way the present government - or its executive - goes about acting.

What sort of preparation have soldiers and police - already "on the ground" in some communities - had for their tasks? What experience does an army reserve doctor have in Aboriginal health? What will occur if it is found that a particular child has been sexually abused? "Removal of the child would be a last resort" a spokesman said. No wonder there are reports of fear among the people of those communities.

Such is my concern about this sudden rough-shod intervention that I find myself quite lost for words.

After YEARS of inaction -
- why is there now no time for consultation - most particularly with indigenous leaders and indigenous communities?
- why wasn't some sort of summit called to discuss the recommendations of recent reports including, but not only, "Little Children Sacred"?
- why is the PM only willing to meet the premiers one at a time but not as a group?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Christian Paterson
June 27th, 2007

What have the terrible conditions in Aboriginal communities got to do with extinguishing land rights? I thought it was the years of dispossession and the vitriolic racism that is de riguer for white society that is causing the problem, not Aboriginal peoples finally being given land rights 120 years too late. I have noticed that of all the ethnicities in the world, white Australians hold a uniquely visceral hatred for their Aboriginal neighbours. Why is this? Guilt? Fear?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Christian Paterson
June 27th, 2007

John Howard said he didn't have a rabbit to pull out of the hat for this election. Well abracadabra.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Ian Patterson
June 27th, 2007

"Tampa II"
We should have seen this coming:
- ever since Eddie Mabo won his case, this government (even in Opposition) has been increasingly anti-Aboriginal.
- this is so blatantly paternalistic it shows neither understanding nor compassion for the people concerned.
- this is the "wedge politics" Howard has used every election.

The Howard Government has no real interest in the welfare of Aboriginal communities - it has had 11 years in which it has proven that. Its focus is on winning the next election and nothing else. The crushing of Aboriginality is an added bonus, the cream on their covert (and increasingly overt) racist cake.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Dr Heather Meyer
June 27th, 2007

We need a response to Howard which says that the people he is taking action against are Australian citizens, ie they are us. Would we think it OK if police and army moved into our local community. Absolutely not, there would be outrage. We would expect health and welfare services to address such problems. Why do we not demand the same for these Australians?
The only way to begin to tackle the huge disadvantage that indigenous communities face is to provide the level of services and funding available to other Australians and to do this in consultation with those communities. Tim Colebatch's article in The Age [26/06] gives some idea of the changes that have to be undertaken.
Howard's program is attacking the victim and making the situation worst by including a land grab. Again outragous.
If so many urban and regional Australians marched for reconciliation shouldn't we be able to mobilise as many to march and keep marching against further injustice to our indigenous brothers and sisters.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jason Alexander
June 27th, 2007

While the stated goal is commendable (but 25 years too late), the reclamation of the native title by the commonwealth may in future open up these areas to full crown control. This being the case, there would be no on ground/local opposition to the installation of nuclear waste dumps, detention centres, mining (including uranium), or whatever is in the 'national intdrest). I am not sure of the details exactly, so I may be wrong. I hope I am wrong, for if the current government overturns the hard won land rights' victories, then the Howard stewardship of our nation has indeed entered the 'let them eat cake' phase.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Janet Hawtin
June 27th, 2007

I am concerned that the policies we make which demonstrate that power is violence communicate a message.
Deaths in custody for swearing with no justice show aboriginal communities how power works in AU society.
These new proposals to be more violent and controlling send the same negative message that gaol, closed loop policy death
and prejudice are what makes people powerful in our society. Our community models the behaviours we are concerned about.
We need to model constructive collaborative power and we need to make that experience integral to our solutions.
http://lucychili.blogspot.com/2007/06/free-culture-and-social-engineering.html

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Margaret Cossey
June 27th, 2007

If we didn't know Howard better we would think his concern was genuine but on his behaviour over the last decade, it is an election ploy. The knowledge that alcohol-related injury and harm, including child abuse has been increasing in poverty stricken and traumatised Indigenous communities, has been in the public domain for the last decade. Sounds familiar, that it has only now reached Howard's ears, much like AWB, and a list of other "I only just found out" events over his term as PM. He is a disgrace and will use any and every method to win the next election. My bet is that Mark Textor (I think that's the spelling) thought this initiative up for Howard.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Ron Bunting
June 27th, 2007

Having lived with and worked amongst indigenous peoples from Western NSW to Mornington Island I have seen very close up just what has happened.
If you have ever known an Alchoholic you will know full well that Howards election stunt is nothing but pissing in the wind.
As any manufacturer will tell you,you cannot have a quality product if you start will shoddy basics.We must go to the basics by starting with one root cause ..Alchohol.
The brewery companies are remarkebly silent on all this and Dr jean Linane pointed out in her book published in the 1990's these same brewers are able to produce their product with no responsibility what so ever for the problems it cuases and are actually enjoying Government patronage in return for favours.
If Howard and his advisors ( and Rudd too,i might add )were actually genuine then a punitive penalty would be placed upon any liquor company who wanted to supply indigenous peoples.Afterall,at the moment the huge profits they are making are the very food from these unfortunates mouths. If the brewers( in general) and their 'on sellers' are so keen to make a dollar ,then let make a dollar but force them to become responsible citizens at the same time.
The cost to the consumer should be controlled to the point where it becomes impossible for a liquor company to turn a profit without breaking the law,where upon further penalties are imposed...much the same way traffic fines are imposed on the rest of us.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Michel Dignand
June 27th, 2007

Of course something needs to be done - but once again the aborigines are going to be used as a punchball simply to boost Howards electoral chances... we DO need to do something, and we MUST NOT allow this ploy, like so many others, to bemuse our population into believing the liberals and giving us another four years of self-serving bastardry.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Roger Byrne
June 27th, 2007

John howard and his government have done more to disinfranchise and destroy aboriginal spirit and culture than anyone else and now they are leaping into to the hole they made .. We do need to do something about this but it can't just be this ,, we must first restore their dignity and sense of hope ..Bring back Whitlam and Keating ..I hope it is liberal politicians overboard this time ..I hope the australian people see it for what it is ..political opportunity on their part

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Bruce Over at the Garage
June 27th, 2007

Laurence W. Britt's analysis of the seven major fascist regimes in recent history reveals fourteen common threads that link them in recognisable patterns of national behaviour and abuse of power. The Howard Government gets a score of 14 out of 14 on Britt's following fascism characteristics:

1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism and xenophobia.

2. Disdain for the importance of human rights.

3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause.

4. The supremacy of the military and police.

5. Rampant sexism.

6. A controlled mass media.

7. Obsession with national security.

8. Religion and ruling elite tied together.

9. Power of corporations protected.

10. Power of labor suppressed or eliminated.

11. Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts.

12. Obsession with crime and punishment.

13. Rampant cronyism and corruption.

14. Fraudulent elections, referenda, plebiscites or public opinion polls.

If Howard is re-elected he will in all probability invent and implement more fascism features.

Do not let this happen!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

ganderson
June 27th, 2007

Your comment
It's all about a waste dump for the nuclear industry isn't
it.He has got to find somewhere to dump it and it does not look like Tampa is going to sail over the horizon again.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Kathleen McIntyre
June 27th, 2007

Of course all this is aimed at the election otherwise why hasn't Howard acted earlier. There is one thing that really worries us, the fact that he is land grabbing, for what purpose? Why should the ownership of the land be have any bearing on child abuse!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Peter Nicholas
June 27th, 2007

Regardless of it's merits, pro or con, I see this plan as just a cynically conceived diversion (cf "Babies Overboard"), a very smelly political red herring, presented for our consumption by a Master of Duplicity.
Makes ones skin crawl---do'n it.
Don't let it divert us from the great issues of climate change, water, industrial relations, the demeaning participation in the illegal invasion of Iraq and our subservience George W Bush and his puppet massters. the neo-com of the US far right

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Cate Tauss
June 27th, 2007

This latest heavy handed policy of Howard is a direct descendant of the "taking the children away" policies of the past that led to the present disfunction in some Aboriginal families. It's not surprising that there is child abuse on many Aboriginal communities- the perpetrators in these cases are victims too. If you grew up as a sick, malnourished child, were taken away from your parents at a very early age so you never knew real care and love, were abused in a orphanage type imstitution or a foster home, had very little education and NO prospects of employment, developed multiple physical and mental health problems, were totally untreated for most of these problems and then were condemned to live in abject poverty with virtually no support in a community where say 30% of adult had suffered the same fate - what kind of a parent would you make and how reposnisble for your actions would you be when under the influence of alcohol and drugs? I know that at this time of the year in many communities in central Australia many people are cold and sick, hurting,dying of diabetes and kidney disease, constantly going to funerals,drinking and fighting,abusing and killing their loved ones. Children are sniffing petrol because it takes aweay the hunger pangs.Then in march the police and soldiers to trigger more stress,confusion,shame, anger,paranoia, self-loathing. What is left for these people - how are we going to evaluate the effect of this intervention- the suicide and death in custody rate, before and after?

Let's watch Howard very carefully on this latest pre- election stunt and push him very hard to properly resource this and any damage it does ($400 million - and the rest!)

I hope his initiative will do something to break the cycle of misery for the children. But I fear truth is always the first casualty in a war and he is approaching it like a war -sending in the troops is what he seems to know best. If it fails Howard don't you dare blame Aboriginal people for it!

Part of the problem is that Howard is a sick man too - otherwise he would feel remorse for what his government has done to Aboriginal people (even over the last 11 years) and he would have no hesitation in saying SORRY.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Howard Dengate
June 27th, 2007

John Altman (ANU) described this emergency action as "political expediency dressed up as moral indignation", which is a fair description. But the depth of opposition to John Howard's plans has brought usually divided Aboriginal organisations together together in a way never before achieved, which is the only good likely to come from it.

Having spent 15 years in the NT I have some perspective on the fact that any progress must come from these Aboriginal organisations, not from emergency paternalism.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Sonia Heap
June 27th, 2007

This war on his own people serves only to highlight how utterly incompetent (in real terms) John Howard's reign has been. The combination of divisive messages and politics upon the issues he chooses to take on in election years, have resulted in a unpleasant culture in Australia - as such his political aims have been consistently fulfilled. It is great to finally see someone pointing out the obvious, where the Labor party and the press fail...as usual.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Trevor Reeves
June 27th, 2007

Well, here goes...against the trend. I commend Howard for his actions. True, some further planning could have been done, but he's taken a tough decision on a tough and intractable problem.

Noel Pearson, in broad terms, supports him. It goes without saying that Pearson understands the problems better than most Australians. He's intelligent, articulate and compassionate.

I don't believe there are many votes in this for Howard, anyway. I say "Well done for doing something."

Trevor

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Carol Mackee
June 27th, 2007

Once upon a time people who owned cattle stations had lots of aboriginal people on those stations. The fed them, clothed them, educated them along with their own kids. hedy went walkabout when they wanted and it was accepted. When the aboriginal people went to town their money was at the police station. They were only allowed so much a day so they weren't drunk or public nuisances. Then along came Gough Whitlam and Paul Keating. Fringe benefits tax had to be paid for by those staion owners. Theyalso had to pay full wages to people who only worked when they wanted, but still lived the way they wanted. That's when the rot set in.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Joan Plank
June 27th, 2007

I just read the NZ Herald stories mentioned in a previous post. The bit about "The welfare measures will later be extended to all beneficiaries" is a worry. If they are going in the "save the children" why would this sort of action have to be extended to all those on benefits? Does Howard think we are all in danger and need protection? It's the sort of thing the pro-gun people predicted isn't it? Take the weapons off the people and then you have an armed police force and army. Use government powers to move in on powerless citizens. It's happening now.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Leon Bendall
June 27th, 2007

There is a wisp of a repeat of Children overboard in this policy. Why are we soohhh surprised at the scope of this and associated problems . Havent we been listenning ?? Are we going to try to treat all the causes or just the affect.
How can a policeman from Glen Iris Melbourne be successful in the short term in such an assignment ?? what about may next year are we going to claim victory in 6 months ?Can we assure other australians that some of these concepts especially those relating to centerlink payments wont be facing similar caveats on their pensions.
Are we going to claim victory from the ship as our American collegues did in Irak. If so let it be from the back of a ship of the desert at least environmentally it is more appropriate

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

angela pollard
June 27th, 2007

The Howard Govt's response to the "Aboriginal emergency" is just another depressing example of their skewed approach to social policy. The rich get carrots (private healthcare rebate, high income tax cuts, funding for elite schools) and the poor and marginalised get sticks (detention centres, workchoices, welfare to work). And the stick gets bigger the darker the face. Why does a drunk in Vaucluse gets a private health rebate for drug and alcohol counselling and yet an alcoholic in Wadeye just has her grog can pulled away?. Solving entrenched social dysfunction requires more than a blunt instrument. The most damaged need the most help. This Govt has spent 11 years in denial, starving Indigenous agencies of funds and silencing dissenting voices. I'm so sick of the wedge, the injustice and the spin- when will it end?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jenny Onyx
June 27th, 2007

I am apalled at this arrogant, paramilitary, oppressive, heavy-handed, ignorant approach to a serious issue. Is this the latest election "children overboard" trick?? Cheap votes by tapping into Australian racist attitudes?

No wonder women and children are fleeing their communities. Remember Rabbit proof Fence?? Perhaps a recycled "stolen generation" about to emerge, this time taking all rights (again) including land away from our indigenous people. I am appalled and ashamed.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

jody warren
June 27th, 2007

The Howard response to the terrible tragedy that is Aboriginal life in Australia and particularly the NT is a political stunt in the exercise of power. As Michel Foucault demonstrated it is not enough to have power it must be maintained and exercised, usually against the weakest in the community.
It has been under the Howard government that the ability of Aboriginal people to self-determine their lives has been dismantled. No wonder he didn't say 'sorry' - this is the continuation of white colonialism, unchanged since the invasion.

Shame on you Mr Howard and your supporters.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Helen Wilde
June 27th, 2007

Be afraid Australia, be very afraid. The timing of this latest cynical exercise is too convenient to be true. Howard is excising Mabo just before the next election. What has child abuse to do with land ownership? The next wave of child abuse is about to be launched on a massive scale, using our name, our voice, our money, as our representatives once again behave as though they are the bullies in the playground.
An analysis of garbage in the homelands would show which liquor companies are making the profits now in the homelands, and they should be charged a levy to provide health workers, as should the mine owners. And NOW.. here comes the nuclear waste dump industry. Shame Australia! This is government by NIMBYs. Endemic Child abuse can't be solved in 6 months, and certainly not by ineffective prohibition and police supervised sexual health checks which are in themselves abuse.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Mike Holliday
June 27th, 2007

John 'W for Wedge' Howard's alleged solution to the problems affecting Aboriginal Australia is a disasterous return to failed and extremely damaging practices of the past.
Of particular concern is the idea of compulsory medical examinations for Aboriginal children.
Such examinations won't stop child abuse, nor identify perpetrators of such abuse.
They will however, identify children who have been abused and thus pave the way to remove those children from their families and their communities.
Given the report's content, there will be a great many such children who will be considered candidates for removal to either monitored accommodation or to 'suitable' foster parents.
The reality of foster care is that any such homes will not be in Aboriginal communities (already damned in the report as places of danger to the children) and 'suitable' parents will not be Aboriginal.
So Howard's end result is rmoval and forced assimilation.
What next? Dissenters in chains?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Angela Dawes
June 27th, 2007

I'm very wary of this and think of it as a most distasteful racially-based political stunt. Howard's shown no interest in improving the health and education of any Australian during his time at Kirribilli so why get involved in the most marginal communities of all - and why now?
And his whole ethos is against longterm, strategic community development actions.
Is living in poverty now to be a crime?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Dr W.M and G.M. Mckenzie
June 27th, 2007

Given the spirit of the PM's approach to aboriginal child abuse, the next step may well be removing children from families, i.e."stealing"" another generation of children.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

charles stanford
June 27th, 2007

Howard has never been motivated by anything other than greedy economics and his desire to stay in power.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Miriam English
June 27th, 2007

Talk to everybody you know about what is really happening here.

Post it on your blogs.

We need to undo big media's quiet acceptance of racist and divisive politics that feed on fear and hate.

Make sure Howard doesn't get rewarded for this. We need to ensure he is so badly stung by it that nobody will try such disgusting tricks again.

Make sure Labour remember what a mistake was their silence on Lib's "children overboard" lies, and how easily that complicity caused Labour to lose that election. The Greens, who were so vocal in their outrage, doubled their vote in that election I believe.

We need to talk to local representatives. When you are out shopping and you walk past your local representative's office, drop in to let them know in person how outraged you are about this racist blaming of the victim and greedy land-grab enforced by stormtroopers (but be calm and polite). If enough people do it we can leave no doubt in the minds of politicians that their voters will hate them for it.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Barbara Jean Rees
June 27th, 2007

Thank goodness there are rational, moral people in Australia who have taken the time to express their horror about Howard's extreme, manipulative and damaging response to one of our nation's greatest shames. Thankyou Getup for giving us a voice. This travesty must not be allowed to be perpetrated.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Marlene Hodder
June 27th, 2007

I too have worked with Aboriginal people over the last 38 years, commencing in outback Victoria, then Redfern, Mornington Island, Central Australia including the Pitjantjatjara lands and find Howard's proposed invasion of Aboriginal communities absolutely appalling. I agree that much needs to be done to improve social conditions for these communities but this is not the way to do it. I feel despair that it has come to this and if I feel despair what do the powerless people themselves feel? Communities are in crisis but they need governments and non-government organisations to work with them, respecting their differing values and cultural norms, not imposing regimes that will not work (and then we can again blame the people for the failure). I could say much more but we need people to rise up and speak out against the way the government is doing what it's doing. Come on, Get Up, let's speak out. This is a blatant land grab, opening up the land and taking away leases. Are we after an NT mining boom or what?? We know there is uranium all over the Territory. Someone has to stop this government. This is outrageous and an indictment on us all if we let this happen.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Sophie Jerrim
June 27th, 2007

I'm appalled by this interventionist plan to tackle some of the problems facing the indigenous communities in the Northern Territory.

This will surely create a great deal of fear and disempowerment in local communities. Without a doubt, children in danger need to be protected. However, sending troops and police in will only create further problems. Engaging and empowering communities is the only way to start to improve long term problems - in any type of community.

It is farcical that the issues in Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory have apparently only suddenly become worthy of action by the federal government. I see it as an obvious ploy by John Howard to attempt to be seen as a decisive and strong leader before the next election.

This "plan" needs to be rethought immediately.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Emma Marro
June 27th, 2007

Fact 1: Aboriginal people lived as warriors and in tune with the land and all its connotations for 65,000 years. Fact 2: White colonisation destroyed everything Aboriginal people were and had in less than 200 years. Fact 3: Howard knows Aboriginal history and he cetainly does not need to be reminded of the ongoing effects the role British white history has continued to play. He won't say sorry because that means compensation (hmm! will any government say sorry if there is a 'cost' attached?). Everyone has to put aside history, elections, and all the 'ifs' and 'buts' and 'shoulda done this' and 'shoulda done'. There is a drastic problem that needs positive action. The real answer to Aboriginal problems is to fix the problems white Australia created - Alcohol, passive welfare, destroyed self esteem, hopelessness. To truly fix a problem the cause of the problem has to be eliminated - permanently. Right? Howard must collaborate with and work alongside with Aboriginal Elders and key Aboriginal people. Has he done this? He must listen and understand, accept Aboriginal law and incorporate those learnings into workable solutions and programs. Has he done this? Without doing these things the only outcome will be a negative one - an 'us' and 'them' environment. This goes against Australia's international reputation and against human rights. Aboriginal people are a beautiful people and that beauty needs to be 'restored' but Howard cannot do it on his own.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Bruce Nulty
June 27th, 2007

The third of, Important Points Made by the Inquiry was, "Aboriginal people are not the only victims and not the only perpetrators of sexual abuse"
This program initiated by the Federal Government should focus on all child abuse in our society, not just the child abuse in one section of it.
The fifth was, "The combined effects of poor health, alcohol and drug abuse, unemployment, gambling, pornography, poor education and housing, and a general loss of identity and control have contributed to violence and to sexual abuse in many forms"
Our program needs a focus wider than alcohol and pornography.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Leanne Veitch
June 27th, 2007

Prohibition?

Yes - that has worked really well in the past. Just look at America's example of how well that worked!

Personally, I wonder whether this latest grab for power over our indigenous people has anything to do with the taking back of native title and Howard wanting to once again control lands that may contain uranium and other valuable resources.

Or am I just being cynical and suspicious?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

gay mooney
June 27th, 2007

Howard is a committed racist. He believes that this sort of thing could not happen in his family. The solution to the problems that Aboriginals face is that they should share in everything that white Australians expect. To heal the trauma that this lack has brought about needs attention. This should begin with according Aboriginals dignity, housing,medical help, education,jobs and all the other things that the white community takes for granted. We non Aboriginal Australians must take responsibility and so demand that this trauma is brought to a close by standing up and forcing our will on the government.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Kate Harriden
June 27th, 2007

This 'plan' is the most despicible thing this government has done - and it has done some terrible terrible things. This is a plan destined to fail both the indigneous & the non-indigeneous community. But I think this agenda behind this 'plan' will pay off for the government beautifully - it will win them the next election. For as racist and paternalistic as this plan is, so is much of white australia. This election will be the 'indigenous' election, like the ones before have been 'refugee' and 'terrorism' elections. The common theme - denigrating human beings and dividing 'us' from 'them'.

And isn't Rudd and the ALP showing its colour's on this issue?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Emma Leu-Marshall
June 27th, 2007

Congratulations Howard, for actually recognising a problem and doing something about it.....so long after being told about it!

Changing a community needs to come from within the community itself. There are multiple issues and problems, mostly social, which may well be addressed with policemen standing over the community in the short term, but in the longer term, when these 'authority figures' are no longer in the community, it will return to the old ways. People will always find a way around things that they don't agree to, or will harbour resentment against authority in years to come.

Police themselves are hardly above blame, with all the accusations of paedophilia and corruptedness. On the whole, the police service does their job, but implementing change through fear cannot be long term change.

As a nation, we need to support the voluntary people on the ground in the communities who have been working tirelessly for many years, in under-funded, and under-supported positions. These people have even been hindered in some cases with the changing of governments (both state and federal). There ARE success stories from work within the communities, where change has been achieved and sustained by the communities themselves.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Neil Fahey
June 27th, 2007

I received the statement below in my e-mail thismorning... I thought it might be of interest all of you.

Neil

----------

Leaders of the Mutitjulu community today questioned the need for a military occupation of their small community.

We welcome any real support for indigenous health and welfare and even two police will assist, but the Howard Government declared an emergency at our community over two years ago - when they appointed an administrator to our health clinic - and since then we have been without a doctor, we have less health workers, our council has been sacked all our youth and health programmes have been cut.

We have no CEO and limited social and health services. The government has known about our overcrowding problem for at least 10 years and they've done nothing about it.

How do they propose keeping alcohol out of our community when we are 20 minutes away from 5 star hotel? Will they ban blacks from Yulara? We have been begging for an alcohol counsellor and a rehabilitation worker so that we can help alcoholics and substance abusers but those pleas
have been ignored. What will happen to alcoholics when this ban is introduced? How will the government keep the grog runners out of our community without a permit system?

We have tried to put forward projects to make our community economically sustainable - like a simple coffee cart at the sunrise locations - but the government refuses to even consider them.

There is money set aside from the Jimmy Little foundation for a kidney dialysis machine at Mutitjulu, but National Parks won't let us have it.

That would create jobs and improve indigenous health but they just keep stonewalling us. If there is an emergency, why won't Mal Brough fast track our kidney dialysis machine?

Some commentators have made much of the cluster of sexually transmitted diseases identified at our health clinic. People need to understand that Mutitjulu Health Clinic (now effectively closed) is a regional clinic
and patients come from as far away as WA and SA; so to identify a cluster here is meaningless without seeing the confidential patient data.

The fact that we hold this community together with no money, no help, no doctor and no government support is a miracle. Any community, black or white would struggle if they were denied the most basic resources. Police and the Military are fine for logistics and coordination but
healthcare, youth services, education and basic housing are more essential. Any programme must involve the people on the ground or it won't work. For example who will interpret for the military?

Our women and children are scared about being forcibly examined; surely there is a need to build trust. Even the doctors say theyare reluctant to examine a young child without a parent's permission. Of course any child that is vulnerable or at risk should be immediately protected but
a wholesale intrusion into our women and children's privacy is a violation of our human and sacred rights.

Where is the money for all the essential services? We need long term financial and political commitment to provide the infrastructure and planning for our community. There is an urgent need for 10's of millions of dollars to do what needs to be done. Will Mr Brough give us a commitment beyond the police and military?

The commonwealth needs to work with us to put health and social services, housing and education in place rather than treating Mutitjulu as a political football.

But we need to set the record straight:

ü There is no evidence of any fraud or mismanagement at Mutitjulu - we have had an administration for 12 months that found nothing

ü Mal Brough and his predecessor have been in control of our community for at least 12 months and we have gone backwards in services

ü We have successfully eradicated petrol sniffing from our community in conjunction with government authorities and oil companies

ü We have thrown suspected paedophiles out of our community using the permit system which our government now seeks take away from us.

ü We will work constructively with any government, State, Territory or Federal that wants to help aboriginal people.


--
Pamela Curr
Campaign Coordinator
Asylum Seeker Resource Centre ASRC
12 Batman St
West Melbourne 3003
ph 03 93266066 fax 03 93265199
www.asrc.org.au

Pamela Curr
http://justfreedom.org.au


Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

bryan amo
June 27th, 2007



No SORRY from Howard, Rudd says he will say SORRY, this coaltion stunt is going to rebound on Howard drawing intense criticism in many counts and it's going end up like the war australia had support to suck up to buddy bush - no mission accomplished likely for Johnnie, not thought out by any of coalition top players, it's going to take ongoing funding and presence of Medics/nurses/social workers/counsellers/army/police/housing commission/laywers/Aboringal human rights at UN descision pending/acholcol denial management/income support/schoo;ls/swimming pools all the stuff excepted by the invaders to the virgin country Australis, 'owned' by native since 40.000 years back. So now we have 'Terra Nullus Tampa' - a black-day for black fellers... Aussie justice just went 'Walk-about' yet again.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.


jamie madden
June 27th, 2007

If you can't win by merit send in the troops, polarize & conquer.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

louise doran
June 27th, 2007

I am shocked and appalled at this intervention by the Howard Government. To send in the troops after 11 years of doing nothing, without any consultaion with indidenous communities or long term planning and funding for the housing, health facilities, education and jobs needed in these communities, will be destructive and achieve little.
It seems to me to be just a cynical exercise designed to steal indigenous land.

Louise Doran

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

peter myers
June 27th, 2007

Its just another unilaterally declared war, another invasion using the only means Howard has the imagination to tackle problems with: troops and police. Its typical Howard jackboot reactionary, racist policy, taking the place of an eleven year policy vacuum, throughout which the Liberal party's been happy to condemn "bleeding heart black arm band versions of Australian history", utterly abandon the indigenous people of this country, arrest any progress that had previously been made in the process of national reconciliation, and dismiss anyone that doesn't share their bleached white anglo-saxon protestant, off to church on Sundays narrow view of life, as being only worthy of being invaded, locked up, or thrown out.

Its time to throw them out, in fact its way, way overdue.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Kevin Johnson-Bade
June 27th, 2007

This is yet another carefully contrived plan to attract the racist, rednecks and, grey mass voters, in the same way that the Iraq war and children overboard issues were used.

Howard has as much real concern for our indigenous communities as he did for the parents that he accused of being able to sacrifice their own children for personal gain. If he had had genuine concern for those people and children, wouldn't he have apologised for accusing the parents of such an unnatural, greedy and cruel act, when it became apparent that the "sources" of information were incorrect. (assuming that he didn't know already)

No apologies needed from John Howard. These cruel and inconsiderate acts are purely those of a "good politician", one that knows how to work the media and trick the masses into believing his lies, and winning votes.

If my assertion were not true, and little john is indeed concerned about these children and their communities, couldn't he have just gone ahead and implemented an effective plan, without shouting out about it. Putting aside the question of whether or not people are guilty as charged, how can broadcasting such matters be of any benefit to an already immensely damaged communities?

Sorry little john, I simply don't believe your lies and deceit, unfortunately though, many will.

True reconciliation will come when we teach our you and they become proud of the fact that Australia's history began in the dream time, not just two hundred years ago.

Reconciliation walks in footsteps of truth.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.


Richard Ure
June 27th, 2007

What a pathetic, myopic, predictable response from GetUp supporters. Many of us joined out of concern for David Hicks and no concern for the kids and women being bashed and violated on a daily basis. Keep this immature attitude up and watch your support dwindle.

Just like Noel Pearson said on last night's LateLine and elsewhere.

All these clever people accusing JWH of political opportunism and them handing him the ammunition to achieve it.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Robyn O'Connor
June 27th, 2007

We all know that what is happening to Aboriginal people is wrong and something does need to be done. I don't have a problem with solutions being provided - they should have been provided years ago. I do have a problem with the way it is being done. Howard's response is back to the bad old days of paternalism and heavy handedness. Again there is lack of consultation with Aboriginal people and not even the appropriate health professionals have been consulted. With his track record he cannot be trusted.

Health checks for Aboriginal children IN CASE of sexual abuse is monstrous. Would this be allowed in any white community where we know sexual abuse also occurs? Could this be next on his agenda?

If the Prime Minister is so concerned why has he wound back so many Aboriginal initiatives, not adquately funded Aboriginal people in the budget that is awash with money and why has it taken the whole of his tenure to discover something that has been known for decades.

Most Aboriginal people, especially the older people will feel it is the stolen children all over again.

This on top of selecting Aboriginal land for nuclear waste and trying to buy the townships. Will it never end? What more do these wonderful people have to endure. We should be respecting them and in partnership with them not constantly abusing and sidelining.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Leo Patterson Ross
June 27th, 2007

The measures set out in response to this report are extreme, however that's not really my issue- the Government has framed this as a "national emergency" and extreme measures are often necessary in emergencies. The issue is that these measures are being proposed and enacted, without consultation with the people of the communities, and seeing what would work for them. What is missing is that the people who are making decisions, are not looking at the issues that have lead to these issues being so prevalent in these communities. Some of the measures that are being proposed are simply, predictably, not going to work without the community owning it as something that will produce the results for them.
One example of this is the Prohibition of alcohol/pornography part of this response. It is very predictable that if people in the community have not taken on for themselves that banning alcohol is going to make a difference, then they are going to try very hard to get around it, just as we've seen everytime one group of people has tried to make another group give up a right. But what we have also seen in other Aboriginal communities is that those communities who have taken on alcohol bans on their OWN will is that it is very successful. You see, the point is that it is not the rule, or law that is important, it is whether there is support and ownership from within the community for that rule or law.

Leo
http://independentvoicesinaustralia.blogspot.com

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

John Borland
June 27th, 2007

The State Governmemts and the 'do gooders' have had many years in which to come up with solutions to this sad problem without doing other than making it worse; now the Federal Government has at last grasped the nettle they should at least be given a fair go to try and help these people.
Everyone applauded when our Forces went into Aceh with humanitarian help, what is different here?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Megan Bird
June 27th, 2007

John Howard is having a lend of all Australians.
There is not a scrap of evidence that Howard's big stick will work. In fact, there is a lot of global empirical evidence (witness Apartheid and our own White Australia Policy etc) that Howard's plan is doomed to failure.
When Howard stops dealing in racism and presents some facts, research and real leadership I will take notice.
Howard has centrestage on this issue and is letting a rare opportunity slip through his fingers.
It is yet another (how many do we need?) example that Howard cares about nothing except his own re-election.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Claire Smith
June 27th, 2007

JACK-BOOT APPROACH DOOMED TO FAILURE

My views are in the media release below.

Claire

MEDIA RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - WEDNESDAY, 27 JUNE 2007

JACK-BOOT APPROACH DOOMED TO FAILURE

Measures aimed at eradicating child abuse in Aboriginal communities are doomed to failure, and will only exacerbate the problems in these communities and add to the suffering of children, according to Associate Professor Claire Smith, of Flinders University.

“The government should be working collaboratively with Aboriginal people, seeking solutions through working with the communities, rather than trying to impose answers from outside.” said Associate Professor Smith. “This heavy-handed, punitive approach is unlikely to led to sustainable solutions.”

“We need to develop a long-term plan that strengthens families and communities,” said Associate Professor Smith. “There are concrete measures that could be put in place-for example, a suitably trained female community policeman whose primary responsibility is the welfare of women and children.”

“Aboriginal women are worried in two directions, now. They are worried about their children, and they are worried about intimidation by the government. These people have a history of being controlled by governments, and a clear memory of kids being taken away. This approach is not new to them.”

Associate Professor Smith also expressed concern at the human rights implications of some of the proposed measures.

“Whilst seeking to stamp out the sexual abuse of children, these measures have the potential to violate these children's right to privacy”, said Associate Professor Smith. “Are we going to subject innocent children to the examination of their genital areas, against their wishes, and with permission that has been coerced from their parents? This is a human rights violation at the most fundamental level.”

“We are talking about societies that are so modest the women wear dresses to go swimming, and where people don't even talk about sex,” said Associate Professor Smith said. “These are societies that have significant differentiation between the sexes and strict rules on how people interact. The genital examination of a young child by a white, male doctor - who will include military reservists, according to Tony Abbott - will be seen as an intrusive act.”

“The measures being put forward are racially based and are doomed to failure because they are being implemented in a heavy-handed manner, and they do not address the fundamental problems. These are complex issues, and they will not be solved by simplistic solutions.”

“If the government is serious about dealing with this issue, it should be working closely with the social scientists who work long-term with specific Aboriginal communities. I see no evidence of this in current planning”, said Associate Professor Smith.


Claire Smith is Associate Professor in Archaeology at Flinders University and President of the World Archaeological Congress. She is a social scientist who has conducted research with Australian Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory for almost 20 years.



AVAILABLE FOR MEDIA INTERVIEWS: Associate Professor Claire Smith
Mobile: 0424 388 925
Phone: 02 4958 3405
Email: claire.smith@flinders.edu.au



FURTHER INFO/IMAGES/INTERVIEWS: Jo Smith
Mobile: 0411 888 664
Phone: 02 9557 4253
Email: agsc@cia.com.au

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Aram Hosie
June 27th, 2007

I find Howard's Solution appalling.
Where to start on why?!

Did he bother to consult Aboriginal people about his solution, talk with the elders? Of course not. He is being disrespectful and parochial in his approach of sending the 'authorities' in to 'fix' the problem. And i'm quite sure he's just going to terrify the local people and cause a volatitle, dangerous situation rooted in fear.

He says that law and order and a 'civil society' is imperitive to protecting children. Of course it is! But 'marshal law' addresses the very pointiest end of that problem. True law and order, a society that is stable and organised needs educational and vocational opportunities, housing, basic services.. Howard is addressing none of that, In fact, he took money OUT of successful programs, such as the employment program that was up there.

Bad, bad idea.. and blatant electioneering

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

chad fenton-smith
June 27th, 2007

It's our Katrina, Johnny said. And he STILL WON'T SAY SORRY!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Kendall Espedido
June 27th, 2007

"What a pathetic, myopic, predictable response from GetUp supporters. Many of us joined out of concern for David Hicks and no concern for the kids and women being bashed and violated on a daily basis. Keep this immature attitude up and watch your support dwindle."

Actually. Many of us joined GetUp out of concern not just for Hicks, but for fellow Australians as well, so that you and I don't end up having our rights taken away by the Howard Government.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Diana Rickard
June 27th, 2007

Sending in the stormtroopers is so un-Australian that it's horrifying. Although it's a difficult thing for extremist non-indigenous government 'leaders' to understand, Aboriginal Australians have rights too!

The people have asked for cooperation and consultative help for decades and the Howard government firstly 'listens' by taking away ATSIC, interfering in Canadian indigenous rights' processes while disenfranchising Australian indigenous people by not endorsing the International Declaration of Rights for Indigenous People, lobbying the NT government to privatise indigenous collective or community land tenure - and now this!

Hitler lulled the German people by saying that firstly gypsies were abusing their children, were unable to live like 'other Germans' and needed 'cleansing'. He and his stormtroopers then turned on other minority groups in the German community. By the time the German people realised how their own humanity was being eroded - it was too late.

But - it can't happen in Australia - can it?

John Howard says he is trampling on Aboriginal and NT rights because 'he can'.

With Kevin Rudd's support, who will be 'cleansed' next?

Diana

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Linda Vij
June 27th, 2007

Tackling the suffering will take a bipartisan approach.
Drastic as things are in remote indgenous communities, the only way to avoid imposing a grim, racist Aparthfield is to have detailed surveys of these communities to find out what residents think is needed and wanted. I would plead for the Federal government to go back to the drawing board so we don't get into measures which in one way or another will perpetuate a "stolen generation" phenonemon.

I would respect the right of indigenous communities themselves to have laws passed to ban porn or alcohol if these items cause too much trouble in their areas, providing bans apply to all residents and visitors (apparently many elders have at least wanted alcohol bans but some whites think they should be exempt).

I have an indigenous friend, Mike Calloway, originally from Cairns, who very successfully addressed alcohol as an issue about 6 years ago with a drug free rehabiliation called Narconon, sponsored by the Church of Scientology and other groups/individuals. This program is in about 40 countries (being higly favored in Scandinavia, Spain and Italy in particular). I met him while he was on the program here in Australia and doing some voluntary work as a cook for the program.

The program employs nutrients as a buffer for withdrawal and also processes to orient people to their bodies and the "here and now" environment as these also help ease withdrawal symptoms considerably. The program then employs a deep tissue spring clean. It is the world's most thorough physical detoxification program, having helped victims of Chernobyl and firefighters in New York who fought the "September 11" fires.

People don't realize that residues from mind altering drugs can build up in the tissues over the years and cause a slowness and even much of what is called the "drug personality". It's only when the "spring clean" is done, that the program addresses reasons for people taking drugs and alcohol and guides them in skills which will help them say "no".

There is a Narconon program in Warburton, Victoria (it used to be in Lower Mangrove NSW, where I met Mike). Donations are tax deductible but I don't think it gets any direct government funding (the government of the State of New York at least put some funds in directly though not nearly enough for everyone needing help but that's typical of government). I think governments should fund Narconon programs in the Norther Territory. And Mike told me just yesterday he would really like to see it happen.

We both think the psychiatric based drug rehabilitation which pour valium over the top is no so helpful most people long term. It has not been much debated about, but there is an official national mental health strategy, which if implemented, would target indigenous children and adults in particular for greater rates of "diagnosis" and drugging. We think it's dangerous.

If one day, compulsory "child development" checks follow compulsory medical checks, watch out!

Yours sincerely

Linda Vij

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Ray O'Brien
June 27th, 2007

Am I just a cynic, or can I perceive the machinations of one Mark Textor drawing a"black armband view of aboriginal history' for John Winston Howard in an attempt to influence the 2007 election results?
To recap the events leading up the Howard's seeming alacrity to confront the issue of aboriginal child abuse we need to examine some of the past history regarding the problem.
Geoff Gallop, then WA Premier, set up an inquiry into the situation in 1999 - the results , released in 2002 [and authored by Sue Gordon], prompted him to declare the abuse "a national disaster".
A Queensland academic, Bonnie Robertson, chaired a taskforce on alcoholism in indigenous communities in Cape York and found it to be "a national disgrace".
A Victorian inquiry in 2002 found that aboriginal children were 10 times more likely to be subject to abuse.
According to a recent weekend article on the problem, Professor Judy Atkinson of Souther Cross University was told, in September 2005, by a senior advisor to a Howard cabinet minister - "We know all this stuff - can't you people just get over it?"
Mal Brough, Minister for Indigenous Affairs, knew about the problem in May 2006 and has done nothing , until recently, to address the problem.
Granted, John Howard has finally acted on the problem. Whether he has acted out of compassion for the children [and still won't say SORRY] or because of his poor standing in the polls committing him to another TAMPA episode is a moot point.
IF he is genuine why hasn't he committed vast amounts of money to ensuring adequate medical help, housing and educational facilities to alleviate the situation? Today, June 27, he announced a further $25 million for his 'Chaplains in Schools' program!!! Seems like his priorities are a little bit skewed away from the indigenous remopte communities!!!
Am I a cynic or a realist?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Tim Lamble
June 27th, 2007

Another Tampa issue in a grab for power. Some of the measures may have some positive effect; but it's hard to see how the most intrusive (medical examinations of children, dumping the permit system, etc.) will resolve the problem. They seem to be a Trojan horse for the reintroduction of surveillance, control and stigmatisation of aboriginal Australians, without any great hope of actually addressing the dysfunction of these communities.
SHAME HOWARD. SHAME.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Emma Leu-Marshall
June 27th, 2007

A comment from a reader in this blog says:
"Everyone applauded when our Forces went into Aceh with humanitarian help, what is different here?"

The difference between Aceh and NT communities, is they are different ends of the same stick.

1: The help in Aceh was received voluntarily. If people did not want help, they did not have to receive it. NT policy is being implemented on a compulsory level, no consultation, no respect for the individuals or the communities.

2: The help involved re-building a natural disaster and re-connecting people without the ability to find lost loved ones. NT policy is segregating, demeaning and bureaucratic.

3: The NT policy ignores the childrens' right to privacy, and violates them without direct due cause.

4: In Aceh, it was assumed that individuals had no cause for the natural disaster. The NT policy assumes that if you are aboriginal, you are either abusing children, a criminal, or incapable of changing.

5: The NT policy is taking control of land without showing a connection between land rights and child abuse or alcohol abuse or anti-social behaviour.

6: (This is important for Australians everywhere) The NT policy is effectively a police state. I never heard of restrictions being implemented in Aceh other than for safety.

7: There are often Caucasian children in these indigenous communities. Are they forcibly being checked too? They are also part of the community and may have suffered abuse too.

Essentially, Aceh was an emergency international response to a national disaster of natural causes. Initially, our help was refused in certain areas. The NT policy addresses an ongoing social (rather than natural) issue, with no consultation with the communities involved, and little or no obvious planning for ongoing assistance.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Kay McPadden
June 27th, 2007

What constitutes an emergency? Another Aboriginal male has died in custody. The numbers are escalating. the life expectancy gap is an international scandal but has it reached a critical number to constitute an emergency. I think so. Add what you like to the list but halt it all please. And what about International Human Rights and the current Howard proposals to act towards Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander peoples?
Kay McPadden

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Valda Cross
June 27th, 2007

You can't solve society's problems, whatever they are, without having law and order. Our town's and city's law and order relies on the willingness of those populations to live as law abiding citizens. Without that willingness to comply or agree to live lawfully, we would have chaos throughout Australia.

Having said the above, I applaud the Government's first step into aboriginal settlements, and, that is, the introduction of law and order, and ultimately a feeling of safety for all who live in these settlements and especially women and children

The steps that follow the law and order problem/s are quite different though. amd somewhat horrific. It is like tearing down the Berlin Wall!! How can you ask people who have been accustomed to having community property and a government that has looked after everything for them, SUDDENLY change. I don't know the answer, and if someone can explain how we can give aboriginals pride of ownership of property individually instead of collectively I will be interested in that answer. Culturally I'm led to believe that aborigines dont believe in individualism, but in a collective ideal. It is akin to Communism and that has never worked for any society - no one owns anything, no one has a purpose, and so on and so on.

What educational standards and health care standards do aboriginal people want? Do they want to continue to live separately in these settlements? How do they want to preserve their culture? And, how do they want to see their lives unfold as an integral part of Australia with one common law (and rights) for all?

I'd like to have an aboriginal person respond to my questions. I'm sure our Government would like to hear those responses also.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

david booth
June 27th, 2007

Howard has zero credibility in aboriginal affairs. He has implemented Pauline Hanson's racist policies, he has downgraded the ministry, he abolished the only chance for Aboriginal self-determination ATSIC. He has "mainstreamed" all services. In 11 years there has been no "positive discrimination" for aboriginals. The settlements have been allowed to run down, hoping they may die out and landowners would drift to the cities. Programs have been trialled and stopped for no reason. Then Brough offered improvements but these were tied to seizure of land and sensibly rejected by aboriginal groups. Now we see a pre-packaged solution. To be imposed at the barrel of a gun, with no planning and no consultation. Sounds like Iraq again. No plan except for excitement to thrash around in there with the army. I say give the states and territory governments more support and let them get on with the job. We don't need a "Johnny Come Lately" stomping with jackboots to reverse the good work already done over the past 80 years. How dare we question his commitment? Well he has form and why would you trust the liar this time?
How can he define this as a "national emergency"? No one has been killed. It is not a Tsunami where 650,000 are dead. There is no nation about to invade Australia. It is not bird flu. It is not an "emergency". It is one of many national problems that has laid untouched by the Howard Government for 11 years. Lets stop being emotional about these little children and work to implement Clare Martin's plan which aims to solve the real problems of poor housing, lack of remote employment opportunities, poor health care, lack of access to education. Sure it will need huge support and funding from the federal government but a proper consultative approach will achieve results better than six months of "shock and awe". Mr Howard does have an exit strategy this time~his efforts will cease in 6 months when he is voted out of office.
David Booth
Bywong NSW

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jennie Hicks
June 27th, 2007

I worked in aboriginal communities in remote S.A. in the 1960`s - prior to aborigines being granted the dubious right to consume alcohol in pubs. At that time prohibition existed on communities - with the result that numbers of people became serious metho drinkers( metho supplied often by white farmers) or drank liquor illegaly .obtained.These people led detructive lives, often ending in death.Programs MUST be initiated to help alcoholics and substance abusers - simply banning a substance is a simpleminded approach.
Aboriginal people are rightly suspicious of white "folk" bearing the labels of police,protectors and welfare officers -they have suffered abuse, humiliation and exploitation at the hands of the very people who were supposed to protect them. If this situation occurred in any small "white" community, eg in the small country village where I live - all hell would break loose. I`d certainly be hostile.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

John Groppi
June 27th, 2007

Another "Tampa"stunt,Howard.
I can feel an election coming on.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Sandi Nielsen
June 27th, 2007

My concern is that this activity is occurring without full consultation about culturally appropriate action. I also don't feel the right message is going through to all those involved in child abuse. A health check for all children white and non white would not go astray and these can be undertaken at schools by school nurses. Pre-schoolers can be checked by community nurses. If staff are trained to recognise when there has been sexual abuse, surely the correct approaches are also built into such a course. The staff members would be known to the community and children and so the checks are less frightening. It is all very well detecting these activities following the act but this does not indicate the offender. The means used by offenders to frighten their victims are very real to the children and must be regarded as real by any examining adult. I note that the prime minister does not mention that the overall population estimate is 1 in 5 are sexually assaulted. Did he forget that? And this is from a man who is proven unable to say sorry.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Brian Hard
June 27th, 2007


Peter Sutton discusses the plans for Indigenous communities
http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2007/s1961695.htm
on Lateline.
When he stated, "I hope that the new bipartisanship at the Federal level is not true bipartisan because I think this area is going to need ongoing open debate. One of the killer factors of the 1970s to 1990s period was the bipartisan conclusion as it were in maintaining a dream that wasn't going to happen." he may have illustrated the primary concern.
How the Government affects rhe bahaviour of the miners and other persons whose predatory behaviour is a component part of the problem shall be revealing. Since they have argued against Aboriginal concerns in this regard they too are a part of the problem.
Another concern that the 'shock and awe' will further impede the people in the communities from becoming more mobile exists.
Howard has again pretended that it all began last week. He will debate until he drops, or, his propaganda can justify his authoritarian actions.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Michael Rodway
June 27th, 2007

Welcome to Children overboard V2.0 - on dry land!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Beverly Baker
June 27th, 2007


If Howard believes that the only way to combat child abuse is to bring in the army, conduct medical examinations, take possession of territory and deny access to government benefits I can't wait to hear the outrage as the military storms the Churches, Sunday School pupils are subjected to invasive medical examination and religious orders lose the funding for their schools, hospitals and welfare agencies.
One law for all --- Racism Sucks

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Kendall Espedido
June 27th, 2007

Why havent we learned from the mistakes of the past, even from more recent ones?

Why employ an imperialistic colonialist approach when we know it doesnt work and causes great damage for generations to come. It's Rabbit Proof Fence all over again.

What a troubled community needs is respect and equal opportunity not forced submission, humiliation and demonization, which is the very reason a community becomes troubled in the first place.

Do we really want to create an Iraq-style zone in our own country?


Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

June 27th, 2007

Thank heavens for Get Up the people here on this blog. I thought I was the only one.
We, here, in this organisation ARE aware..how do we make the mainstream citizens aware of this most awful knee jerk reaction of Howard's.

I want to do something.
What can I do?

I want to help.

Please can we have a petition started for when Parliament is recalled, extraordinarily?

This is atrocious.
This is wrong.

Good grief!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jonathan Ritchie
June 27th, 2007

This is of course all about this year's election - Howard is at his sneakiest by hiding his desperation to win behind the real social concerns felt by many Australians about child abuse, alcoholism, etc. (of course these problems are far from restricted to the Indigenous part of the community but thanks to our supine, roll-over-and-tickle-my-tummy media, there's little reflection of this in the 'news' coverage). These issues are complex and require long-term investment, patience, and community ownership to resolve, but with an election to win in four months, who has time for that? No, far easier and also far more appealing to most non-Indigenous Australians to send the troops in, to further demonise and blame the victims of decades - no, centuries - of past inaction, exploitation, and genocide. Jobs? Education? Health? A future? Stable social structures? Connection with the land? No - remember, it's all about law and order - this will fix it, forget the rest.

What's to be done? Can GetUp, at the very least, get up a petition again, as has happened in the past? We need a collective voice on this.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

shirley millward
June 27th, 2007

The problem of abuse in Aboriginal communities has been known for years and anyone who really believes that "honest John" is remotely concerned for the welfare of our first Australians must be naive in the extreme.
He of course is using the issue for cheap political leverage as he did with Tampa, the MUA conspiracy and the lies he told us regarding the Iraq war.
The man is a very dangerous person to whom lies come easier than truth.
The idea of commiting troops to the settlements is gross.
As Alan Carpenter has said, why would he suddenly want to deploy police from State duties when we have inumerable Federal police officers and Civil Servants busily interfering withother nations affairs in John's Empire building in the Pacific.
Some Aboriginals do need help but not this obscene responce being enacted by a very shallow and cunningly mendacious excuse for a Statesman.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Sue Williamson
June 27th, 2007

I was shocked to hear Howard's move to send in the troops to Aboriginal communities. The person who won't say 'sorry' for the first lot of abuse of children, is abusing children again by forcing intimate medical checks on them. What would we think if they were our children or grandchildren?! It is straight racism. It is nazism actually. And Mal Brough says, 'why should women and children be frightened of police'!!!! Hasn't he learned anything from history?
Abuse of children is dreadful, but this government has known about it and done nothing for at least 8 years. Child abuse is equally prevalent in the white community too, so why are those people not being targeted? And why do you need to take away their land rights in order to protect children? It is a desperate land grab. Howard targeted Aboriginal rights the minute he got into power, and he is determined to finish it off before he leaves. I am ashamed that a government of Australia would act in this way.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Marella Pettinato
June 27th, 2007

I can not believe this is happening in my life time, now in 2007. Bringing in the troops/police is like something I have read about before Indigenous peoples were allowed to be Austrailians. Last year I did my cross cultural training, as part of my obligation prior to doing voluntary work for Indigenous Communities. Howard and Brough have broken every rule that I leaned. Why are they taking up and idea from Noel Pearson? The NT is not his Country! Why is the government not consulting with the Leaders from that Country?
There have been many reports over the past 10 years which have mentioned that some children are at risk, why is the government only acting now?
I would like to help all children at risk, those in Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities of whom there are many. I believe the only reason that the Federal Gov is going in now is the pending Federal Election. We are a wealthy nation and we hear this spouted from Treasurer Costello frequently- so why can we not afford to assit with health, water, housing, addictions, employment, training- etc etc?
Once again I find myself saying "I am ashamed to be an Australian"
I would like Getup to put up a partition asking Mr Howard to consult with the local Leaders, speak with Communities that are doing well and have overcome many problems. Not shoot first then ask questions approach.
Thank you.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Elizabeth Stone
June 27th, 2007

Many of us are deeply worried about John Howard's response to the abuse of children in Aboriginal communities.
If he does this for (or is that to?) Aboriginal communities is he also going to do it in non-Aboriginal communities where similar abuse occurs? This means at least one in four of every home in Australia!
Howards (and sadly and unbelievably, Kevin Rudd's too) response is clearly politicking of the worst and most cynical kind.
Why, oh why, are they not supporting the people within those communities to solve the deep and endemic problems their own way?
Abuse of children, alcoholism, drug abuse and violence are all symptoms of lack of self-esteem, lack of meaninful existence through having equal opportunity in society to good health, housing, education and work.
Mr Howard and Mr Rudd should ask the women in the communities how they can help them. Not wheel in the big guns!
I'm outraged at their plans!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Lyndal Reid
June 27th, 2007

Does he mean compulsory medical examinations to establish if sexual abuse has taken place? How abusive!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Ted Land
June 27th, 2007

Howard is only ever motivated by his own political gain and the desire to stick it up his political opponents. His belated intervention in an admittededly severe Aboriginal welfare problem smacks of insincerity and opportunism yet it has been given overwhelming support from a compliant media who tacitly accept that his motivations are honourable. This is the attempt at pulling the rabbit out of the hat to save his and his party's political skin. Enough people accept this mean little trickster's antics and vote him back into power election after election. Can he do it again?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Libor Konicek
June 27th, 2007

As outraged as you all may be, I agree with the few comments made here regarding the fact that taking over indigenous communities may only be a precursor to doing the same thing anywhere: look into the Hurricane Katrina aftermath. It is time we realised that our Government only does what the 'people' with money tell them to do. If you think throwing money into education and health can make a difference: you are dreaming, check your own health and that of your neigbour; we are all getting (being made) ill and the population is getting dumber. It is time for a revolution, a time for somebody to govern for the people and not for the rich assholes (who don't even live in Australia BTW), who dictate matters on education, health and everything else that matters.
It's time Australia found their own Fidel Castro or a Hugo Chavez who has the guts to tell the Empire where they can shove their 'fascist democracy', and start making decisions for the people who elected them, not for the bankers or the mining companies. Is anyone out there who has the guts? . . . . anyone ?
At the next election vote for someone like Sandra Kanck who has the guts to identify the mining industry as one of the responsible perpetuators for these attrocities. If everyone voted for any representatvie beside Liberal or Labor, we may still have a chance, and on behalf of ALL AUSTRALIANS please do just that, for that is our only chance.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

raeleen lawrence
June 27th, 2007

How can any of these new tactics work when these seem to be something that would have been done by the culturally ignorant, unempathetic, rascist authorities of a bygone era.
Lack of empowerment and consultation with the indigenous people and their resulting fear of white authority is a major cause of the problems within these communities. WHY is the govt repeating mistakes from the past??
Of course something has to be done but a quick fix is not going to work so why not take the time to work on a solution that will really have success.
Please think of these communities not what looks good for the government.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Rob Stewart
June 27th, 2007

What a pitiful lot we are reflected in the majority of responses to this important question. So it may be political opportunism..so what.. The important thing is that something is going to be done at last to protect children from the sexual abuse predators that are destroying yet another generation of our indigenous brothers. I wonder how many of you have been to the NT to see first hand the problems and years of neglect by mainly state governments. Noel Pearson should be congratulated not vilified for his passionate plea to save his people.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Ross Cariola
June 27th, 2007

In his propaganda speech a few days ago, John Howard attempts to sell us the merits of using military force on ordinary citizens. He also reveals, perhaps unwittingly, how he views this country when he refers to indigenous Australians participating in our 'economy'. This is possibly the clearest evidence, as if we needed more, that the concept of a society, in which people are more than just cogs in a money-making wheel, is completely lost on this emotionless accountant.
Time to go John and it has been for a long, long time.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Krystal
June 27th, 2007

This is so seriously distressing. I too would like Labor to take the hard line and tell Howard where to stick his military occupation of sacred Koori land, and get stuck right into this as a priority. You can be critical of measures such as this without 'enabling child abuse', Labor seem petrified that the Coalition will paint them in an incredibly unflattering light if they dare speak out against this proposal.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jason Masters
June 27th, 2007

I believe that the current Federal Government has been lacking for most of their time with any real strategy in this area. I agree that there is a need for significant improvement, but what is the end outcome required.

I have a number of concerns with this response.

If we look at the Murray River Scheme, this has come unstuck because the Government did not have a coherent strategy that was worked through with all the stake holders.

They have not learnt their lesson.

They announced this major program, but had not worked through the plans, needs, issues and risks.

In the paper this morning the responsible Minister was complaining about scare mongering by the uninformed. If the Government had applied Project Management 101 they would have

1) Engaged all the stakeholders before any program was announced
2) Marshalled all the required resources rather than scrambling for them as they are at the moment
3) Considered all the risks and issues, which would include the maze of legal issues that are now coming up with forced examinations of children which may in fact constitute an assault
4) Have clear targets and outcomes that can be measured. At the moment we are in for the long haul, but (and perhaps like the Iraq effort) we do not have any measures to know when we have arrived.

As for this being our Katrina, I was in the US when that happened, and there was a clear lack of leadership and insight into what was happening and the response. The Howard Government has acknowledged that they have failed, but where is the inquiry into their failure to deliver. Also I was in the US recently and there is still on going problems in the recovery effort, how is the Government going to not mimic this problem as well.

Finally I am concerned that the Government feels that they need to bring out the military into a domestic issue. I think the Government is (perhaps continues) to cross the lines of the role of Government, Policing and the Military.

I have for years been concerned about the situation of our first citizens, but I an not sure this is the most appropriate response, and I think the approach taken has received the response from those who it is intended to help because of a failure to plan and consult.

Howard is wanting Australian schools to deliver an improved understanding of Australian History. If the Howard Government had reviewed and understand the history of Aborigines and their relationship with the White Australia I feel a better approach would have been considered.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jane Lawton
June 27th, 2007

I lived and worked in a remote Aboriginal community for 5 years. The problems were enormous and complex. The people remained resilient. Along the way many many reports and recommendations were written. If even half of the recommendations made in those papers had been consistently applied, the situation would not be as it is today. I am deeply upset that the response seems to hark back to days of great pain for the living elders. I am deeply suspicious of the taking back of the land as the nuclear issue is on the table too. When they set off the nuclear tests in Maralinga and Oak Valley, they said no people lived there. They did. Now it seems very suspicious that nuclear power, uranium mining and nuclear waste issues are being talked about at the same time as a takeover of Aboriginal lands. There are many better solutions and there is a need to have some consistency. It is an outrageous response to an outrageous situation. It is like having a war to make peace.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Diana Burgess
June 27th, 2007

Is this really about the children? Is it nothing more t han electioneering...or something more than that even......the NT have a large uranium mine........

It was a noble thing to do till he decided to call in the military.....then my suspicions were raised.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

elizabeth wright
June 27th, 2007

The Pm unfortunately has rocks where his brains should be. This is a knee jerk reaction for political gain. There is possibly another agenda. This is how a conquering country treats the disposessed. You can not force your will upon another. Just like we can not tell Muslim women that they should not wear the hajib, or should not be subserviant. You can not tell Aboriginal families that they must subject themselves to the violation of their privacy . It has already been violated by one brand of person and now the PM wants to do it again. It is a hard call and one that need to be dealy with sensitively.The perpetrators of child sex abuse should be brought to justice.(What ever that means, as there seem to bean unbalanced or even negledgable justice these days in Australia.)Let the Aboriginal people say how they want to do it. Give them a voice. Dont depend on Mr Brough. He seems insensitive enough to put the boot in, or open mouth before engaging brain. APAULING

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Michael Harvey
June 27th, 2007

This is about mining land grabs. Hugh Morgan must be licking his chops. Our political leaders are exhibiting their ugly fascist theocracy in full cry now.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Claire Haywood
June 27th, 2007

Why isn't John Howard sending doctors and nurses and teachers into Indigenous communities, instead of the police and the army? And why does he make the assumption that the child abusers are Indigenous? This is an outrageous paternalistic, racist act that takes this country back a hundred years. Our Indigenous people have been suffering in abject poverty and third world conditions for so long now under a government that doesn't give a damn, that it makes this stormtrooper-style intervention a tragic farce. Is this John Howard's Tampa 2 that will win him re-election and allow him to bury his head in the sand for another three years, or is it the beginning of apartheid in Australia where there are two sets of laws for blacks and whites? Time to hang up your jackboots Johnny.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Margaret O'Shane
June 27th, 2007

Your comment
Howard is showing his true colours to the world (I only hope a lot of people see what they are). Not only is he responding to this business with a knee jerk reaction, but he is also wanting to remove all Aboriginal people from the National Parks including The Great Barrier Reef, Uluru/Katatjuta, Kakadu and Jarvis Bay. And he and other members of his team are saying that Aboriginal people should forget about their Aboriginality and get up to the 21st Century.
What is his hidden agenda? Not only is it an election year but there are minerals under the grounds in Aboriginal Country.
He is a racist and is very greedy.
If there's money available for his means where was it when the Aboriginal people made applications for their projects for the same and other projects?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Kimberley Davenport
June 27th, 2007

I feel deeply concerned about the situation in the NT. I lived on Aboriginal Communities spanning SA and NT for many years and walked out of there feeling blessed (of the opportunity to learn) and saddened by the hopeless lack of opportunity for young people out there. While I believe immediate action does need to happen to protect our children, an attitude of safety rather than brutal separation/intervention is required. All elements of this sad story need to be addressed. All elements need identifying, reform and rehabilatation. Real, practical permanent action. Why does the Govt. push aside groups like the NPY Women's Council (Alice Springs) who have infinite knowledge and wisdom in these sensitive and terrible issues? They are the people on the ground; many wonderful, intelligent, caring, hard working Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal field workers who know the communities and the ways... They are a valuable resource and hold a steady place within the fracturous lives of many. Sincerely Kimberley Davenport.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Judy Hardy-Holden
June 27th, 2007

This is a typical John Howard move. It is prgamatic and populist without any bones of research, policy development, even genuine altruism underpinning it. It is an empty, meaningless gesture that undermines Australian values, ethics and constitution for apparent political gain. The man is shameless in his pandering to the easy fix.

Easy fixes are generally no fixes and this ediface will come tumbling down to the detriment of the Aboriginal people and there will be more wasted time and money without a quanifiable result.

But it will play well with people who do not have the time to really think about the issue. They will feel grateful that SOMETHING is being done. It is just that the something is the wrong thing.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Robin Lake
June 27th, 2007

All people living on Aboriginal settlements are suffering from a acute lack of funding over the past 10+ years - who can forget Graham Richzrdson almost in tears because of the 3rd World conditions he saw Aboriginal living in in 1990 something? I think he promised more money too, but the money never gets beyond the bureaucratic govt departments - send police and other public servants to the NT and they are all claiming daily allowances and overnight allowances worth thousands of dollars - and the Aboriginal people still get nothing. At the end of the day all those daily allowances and pay for the police and defence force troops add up and the govt then says "look at all this money we have spent on this problem". The benefit to the people on the settlements? Nothing.
Where are the Aboriginal representatives on the the various committees? Do my eyes deceive me or is Roger Corbett ex Woolworths on a committee? What are his credentials? What does he know about Aboriginal needs? There are so many competent, educated and available Aboriginal reps who could be consulted - there are many decent, hard working Aboriginals in all communities but nobody hears about them or asks them to help with the consultation.
As for the change in land tenure, this is totally unacceptable to all Australians.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Christine Robertson
June 27th, 2007

The sending of troops today smacks of pre-election grand-standing. None of the remote area communities have resources for these troops - there is no extra housing - already up to 19 people share a house - and no restaurants. Tents are not viable for the police, public servants and military units in the forthcoming wet season. Today's troops are conveniently bound for the community nearest Uluru, and its attendant resort. Good luck to the Public Servants who get sent to the other communities!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Geoff Saunders
June 27th, 2007

Whenever confronted with any problem of this nature, Howard's first response is "Are there votes in doing something?".

If the answer is no, he will do bugger all.

Then he thinks, "OK, maybe there are no votes in actually doing something, but are there votes in sounding like I'm doing something?"

If the answer is yes, you will hear a whole lot of BS from the rodent for a day or a week, then nothing. The gullible conservative braindead community will, however, be left with the impression that their miniature hero has done something when he has in fact done sod all.

If the first two don't work, and he really needs to actually do something, he thinks: "What sort of action will appeal to conservative braindead types?"

The answer, of course, is send in a bunch of folks with uniforms and guns.

Hence Howard's current "response" to this "revelation" that, shock, horror, Aboriginal communities are grossly disadvantaged and suffer hideous social problems.

Remember the "send in the troops to fix Aboriginal housing" episode? What the hell ever came of that? I think I am on safe ground in assuming...

BUGGER ALL.

THERE'S A RAT IN THE KITCHEN, WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO...

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jessica Sullivan
June 27th, 2007

I cannot begin to express my disgust and sadness at Howard's latest 'solution'. It is ridiculous and i really am gobsmacked. The level of insensitivity and the paternalism is gross. He is treating Aboriginal people in the communities like naughty children who need to be grounded and their 'pocket money' denied. How any positive lasting change is going to result from these actions is beyond my comprehension. SHAME SHAME!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Helen
June 27th, 2007

I am totally horrified by this inept, foolish government action. The sooner we rid ourselves of John Howard and his party, the better.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Malcolm Perry
June 27th, 2007

I am a teacher...and I don't care if it is political decision. I have seen too much abuse and neglect in aboriginal families first hand and if something is actually being done regardless of the motive I applaud it. I have seldom supported Howard but if it saves any kids I support it fully. Regards Malcolm Perry.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Doug Stenhouse
June 27th, 2007

You've got to hand it to John Howard, the little slimebag is a political genius with all the cunning of a sewer rat! This "state of emergency" has been a state of emergency for years and years. Now, what has suddenly changed to bring it to the top of the coalitions priority list? Could it possibly be that there is an election about 6 months off perhaps? Howard is the wedge politician par exellance and he has found his second "children overboard". If there is any criticism of the Federal Government response from the opposition, Kevin Rudd must know full well what a difficult path this will be, because Howard and Co will huff and puff themselves up with righteous indignation and trumpet that the Labor party supports abuse of aboriginal children!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Helen Vaskin
June 27th, 2007

Niel; thanks for posting Pamela Curr's articulate response to this current crisis. She highlights the many fundamental flaws in the opportunistic spin from a PM who cares more about re-election than the plight of indigenous Australians. For example, as Ms Curr points out, what will happen to alcoholics when this ban is introduced? If there are no rehibilitation services to back up prohibition, how will it ever have anything other than disastrous results? This crazy and essentially racist idea has no hope of working without, at the very least, a long overdue injection of funds for vital health and medical services....services that the rest of us take for granted. But most importantly, we need to hear more voices from communitites who have experienced the Government's policies firsthand. And then we need Governments to listen.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Patrick Ryan
June 27th, 2007

My understanding is that the hardest thing in policing child abuse in the NT is lack of admissible evidence. In the end prosecutions fail.

Now comes jack boot Johnny and announces that he is coming to lock up the the Abusers.

In policing you would get better warrant searches if the target does not know you are coming. Now after this fanfare, It is highly likely that witnesses are being silenced,and physical evidence is being destroyed.

Over eleven years you would reckon that the Howard Government would have made arrangements to increase funding to AFP police and the NT police to improve community policing. Quietly and steadily they would have gained the forensic evidence necessary to catch Abusers.

This is why I believe that this is just showboating because he has practically destroyed any chance of successful prosecutions.

If you are serious about stopping child abuse you would not tell them you were coming. If it is not showboating than it is gross negligence for a "policing" operation.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Robert Pulie
June 27th, 2007

From Crikey.com:

1. Mutitjulu community leaders: please listen to us
Mutitjulu community leaders Dorothea and Bob Randall write:

We welcome any real support for indigenous health and welfare and even two police will assist, but the Howard Government declared an emergency at our community over two years ago -- when they appointed an administrator to our health clinic -- and since then we have been without a doctor, we have fewer health workers, our council has been sacked, and all our youth and health programmes have been cut.

We have no CEO and limited social and health services. The Government has known about our overcrowding problem for at least 10 years and they’ve done nothing about it.

How do they propose keeping alcohol out of our community when we are 20 minutes away from a five-star hotel? Will they ban blacks from Yulara? We have been begging for an alcohol counsellor and a rehabilitation worker so that we can help alcoholics and substance abusers but those pleas have been ignored. What will happen to alcoholics when this ban is introduced? How will the Government keep the grog runners out of our community without a permit system?

We have tried to put forward projects to make our community economically sustainable -- like a simple coffee cart at the sunrise locations -- but the Government refuses to even consider them.


There is money set aside from the Jimmy Little foundation for a kidney dialysis machine at Mutitjulu, but National Parks won’t let us have it. That would create jobs and improve indigenous health but they just keep stonewalling us. If there is an emergency, why won’t Mal Brough fast-track our kidney dialysis machine?

Some commentators have made much of the cluster of s-xually transmitted diseases identified at our health clinic. People need to understand that the Mutitjulu health clinic (now effectively closed) is a regional clinic and patients come from as far away as WA and SA; so, to identify a cluster here is meaningless without seeing the confidential patient data.

The fact that we hold this community together with no money, no help, no doctor and no government support is a miracle. Any community, black or white would struggle if they were denied the most basic resources. Police and the military are fine for logistics and coordination, but health care, youth services, education and basic housing are more essential. Any program must involve the people on the ground or it won’t work. For example, who will interpret for the military?

Our women and children are scared about being forcibly examined; surely there is a need to build trust. Even the doctors say they are reluctant to examine a young child without a parent’s permission. Of course, any child that is vulnerable or at risk should be immediately protected, but a wholesale intrusion into our women's and children’s privacy is a violation of our human and sacred rights.

Where is the money for all the essential services? We need long-term financial and political commitment to provide the infrastructure and planning for our community. There is an urgent need for tens of millions of dollars to do what needs to be done. Will Mr Brough give us a commitment beyond the police and military?

The Commonwealth needs to work with us to put health and social services, housing and education in place rather than treating Mutitjulu as a political football.

But we need to set the record straight:

There is no evidence of any fraud or mismanagement at Mutitjulu – we have had an administration for 12 months that found nothing.
Mal Brough and his predecessor have been in control of our community for at least 12 months and we have gone backwards in services.
We have successfully eradicated petrol sniffing from our community in conjunction with government authorities and oil companies.
We have thrown suspected p-dophiles out of our community using the permit system which the Government now seeks take away from us.
We will work constructively with any government, state, territory or federal, that wants to help Aboriginal people.

Bob Randall is the subject of the documentary &Kanyini.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Rachel Morse
June 27th, 2007

On the Aboriginal children topic... I thought Noel Pearson had some really interesting perspectives and suggestions on the problem, and a lot of sensible solutions. His approach seemed so much more sensitive than the list outlining the PM's plan of attack. That's just it... to me he seems to be 'attacking' the problem. He may be sincere in his concern for children (I hope so, I don't want to see it as anything else), but Noel Pearson seems acutely aware of how important it is to not throw your weight around, and the PM's approach doesn't assure me of that.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Lance Frizzell
June 27th, 2007

I'm supprised if people of Australia can't see through this act of humiliation and degradation of a minority of Australians.
This is stormtrooper behavior and I am frightened. If they can do this, then all Australians should be very worried indeed.
I have a lot of contempt for our government. I do not vote and will not. The government is illegal and have shown their capable of any act against hard working Australians with little concern to us. They are not working for us but an agenda that is global and not local.
All Australians should band together and support our indigenious equals and help them compassionatly to solve this problem. Not round them up like animals and treat them like second class people.
Who's next, Irish, Lebonese, Turkish, Sudanese, Chinese, when will this stop. This is illegal and an outrage and I am ashamed to be an Australian.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Ruth Vitek
June 27th, 2007

I'd like to know the real agenda of this takeover in the NT. An election - Indigenous children overboard? Another step towards genocide - keep em roped in and impose unrealistic laws?

Why has it been done with such sudden gusto and speed? How does our dear PM expect to detox a vast amount of people without appropriate medical and psychological support?

The mind boggles as to what John is up to this time. Me thinks he is knows he is on his way out and is grabbing at anything to secure his place in our history books.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Michael Leslie
June 27th, 2007

At last someone is doing something about aboriginal health. However, I am so sceptical as it comes just before a federal election and we won't know if this strategy will be successful until long after polling day. Also what has land rights got to do with any of this stuff. It would seem as though Mr Howard is out to get votes and is out to deliver a huge windfall to the mining industry. I don't believe this controlling, power hungry, autocratic and materialistic government cares for our indigenous community in any shape or form. I am very angry about the way all of this has been engineered.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

John C Shorten
June 27th, 2007

It time to Go Jack Boot Johnny, Peter the Chicken Man and Col Mal. Your time is UP! Talk about an election coming up this year. Johnny where were you for the past 11 years. Next you want all Aborigines to leave NT.

Bring on full community consultation not an Invasion

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Bozena Sawa
June 27th, 2007

Reading the comments there is not much to add. It is outragous how rasist this government is. Child abuse is not limited to aboriginal communities. When you start talking with poeple you would be suprised how many people were subjected to it. why don't we research other communities, bording schools?

There is no money for aboriginal health but there is funds for army and police to be sent there. Is this a way to fund army and police from the budget promised to go to aboriginal communities?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jan Hanlon
June 27th, 2007

We cannot believe what we have been hearing and reading about these last few days. Sending in the troops and police to FIX a problem that has been the blight of indigenous communities for as long as we can remember. This heavy handed approach by John Howard seems like the last straw in the dying days of this Government. We feel his motives are entirely political. Quite simply no compassion at all has been shown for the term of his Government. What he is doing is dangerous and the repercussions will be enormous.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Beverley Johnston
June 27th, 2007

Your comment
I haven't thought as far as the land grab, as have others. But our PM in his 12th year, has finally found his election year rabbit in the hat, his Tampa, his interest rates, and all the other issues that have suddenly found his focus in previous election years.
This is apalling paternalism, electoral opportunism, a sudden knee jerk reaction to years of inaction, ignorance and arrogance.
The army is going in next week? Where is the planning, where are the advisors, indigenous or otherwise, where are the medicos and support staff? Why such an immediate response to his ill-thought out agenda?
And most importantly and obviously, where are the jobs, where is the basic selfhood that would solve all these issues immediately.
Mr Howard, we are disgusted and insulted.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

mal jones
June 27th, 2007

This act of Howard bastardisation is simply something we can't beat.
Howard is the master when it comes to things like preying on peoples fears and prejudices. He knows there are millions of deep seeded racists out there who don't mind a bit of "Abbo bashing" and he's playing them like a piano on this one.
What's worse than that is these racist bastards love it. They love it so much they're going to vote for him again and there's nothing we can do about it.
Howard's motto is "Divide and Rule" and he's en song with this one.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Louise Carmichael
June 27th, 2007

Sending the troops in....Is anyone else experiencing a Dejavu here? Didn't Howard learn anything from Iraq?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Andy Cole
June 27th, 2007

From the point of view of child care and protection, the militaristic approach of Howard's is totally inappropriate. From the point of view of electioneering it makes sense to Howard, as he evidently judges that a lot of voters would be happy so see another opportunity for state abo-bashing. However I hope and am inclined to believe that too many people will see his actions purely as cynical and vindictive electioneering, and that from that point of view it will be counter-productive.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Eleanor Wood
June 27th, 2007

There are a lot of `D` words here--Dispossession, desperation, desolation,and now denigration of Aboriginal Australians.
Why not Discussion?One day is not enough time to sit down and listen to what Aboriginal people want.
This military-style deployment of troops and police into tribal lands risks leading to further dissolution and disintegration of these first Australians.
Remote communities should be able to retain the right to say who can come on their lands, Is this a land grab too?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jill Whittaker
June 27th, 2007

What distresses me most is that the many fine people who live in these areas are all tarred with the child abusers brush because of this response which is more about getting headlines than results. Abusing everyone to stop little children being abused is a shameful way to act.

That organisations and structures in the Aboriginal community have been systematically destroyed by the Howard government leading to this emergency is a national disgrace.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Gai Early
June 27th, 2007

"The old ways haven't worked" says Mr Howard. Whose "old ways", Johnny? Certainly NOT the old Indigenous ways! In traditional culture child abuse, and the abuse of women, was punished, and punished severely. Severely enough to protect both women and children very effectively.

John Howard needs to read his own social history! In white society women and children were "property", men - as late as the 1950's - were scientifically and authoritatively "unable to control their sexual impulses" and therefore not to blame for giving in to their animal (in my opinion sub-animal) natures.

It is truly tragic to see the impact that the clash of Indigenous and Invaders cultures has had on a group of people whose traditional lifestyle, based on a strong and firmly enforced tribal law structure, enabled them to survive successfully on one of the harshest continents on the planet for over 40,000 years.

And yes, I'm white. And I am ashamed at the lack of understanding of the underlying Indigenous issues, not to mention the lack of effective implementation of the many positive, supportive, and culturally appropriate solutions proposed in the multitude of research projects and reports already in existence on Indigenous issues.

Shame, Howard, shame. Try living in an Indigenous community for a year and you may learn something if you have the courage!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

janine symons
June 27th, 2007

gobsmacked. just gobsmacked.

is get-up planning a united response?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Helen Murray
June 27th, 2007

Is this site dedicated to total negativity about the Howard government or something? It's about time the children got protection, even if it is from their elders. Many Aboriginal communities have managed to deal with petrol sniffing, alcoholism and family abuse, so we know it can be done. Those who haven't done it need help, and who says the government is not going to be listening to the communities while prohibiting such abuse, in order to get long lasting results. Howard is attacked on everything he initiates right now just because it is pre-election time. Would you rather he sat back and stopped functioning altogether? That argument is sick.

It's better to get behind him and help/promote the communication process than automatically abuse him for his effort. I believe strongly in the aboriginal people, but this has been going on too long and a strong helping hand is needed.
Abuse of children is illegal, full stop. No-one, I don't care who they are, black, white or purple with pink spots, should get away with it. Everyone would prefer the aboriginal communities sorted the matter themselves, but that hasn't happened. What is needed is discipline, not money. Money can't buy discipline. Self-discipline is preferable, and possible, but short of that .....

My personal opinion is that child sex abusers, black, white and brindle, should be turned over to the firing squad. Some crimes deserve the death penalty, and this is definitely one of those! Communities would respond to that by learning rather quickly I think! Every beautiful child deserves protection at all costs!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Eloise Schnierer
June 27th, 2007

This is a land grab. This is a blatant land grab. The Howard government does not care about our communities. The big men that make up the government do not care about the issues facing our communities. If they did care they would not have neglected Indigneous communities, particularly remote communites, for the last decade. More than 10 years of neglect.

Now Howard wants to use the traditional lands of the people of the Northern Territory to build more wealth for white Australia by stripping them of natural resources and using them as a dumping ground for the world's nuclear waste.

Using smoke, mirrors and a deep vein of racism and puritanism that is embedded in the non-indigenous Australian psyche, Howard is deflecting our attention from the real issue - the changes he wants to make to land tenure to enable short-term leases over Aboriginal lands. These changes will have disasterous consequences for Aboriginal people in the NT. Communities will become so susceptible to the immense pressure of the mining industry.

Yes there is a crisis in Aboriginal communities. But that CRISIS is not sexual abuse. Check the statistics, sexual abuse and pedophealia are more prevalent in the non-Indigenous community that the Indigenous. Sexual abuse is heinous and a problem in any community. Yes it exists and needs to be dealt with in all communities in Australian society. But the REAL CRISIS is the absence of essential services and lack of sound and culturally appropriate economic development.

Please do not be fooled by Howards obfuscations. Lets not have another Tampa. Do not let Howard demonise the original peoples of this land with his BS.

Where is the non-indigenous Australian community when they are needed? People in NT are sacred. Women are going bush with their children, so afraid that they will lose them to another stolen generation. If I lived NT I would be doing to same. Please GET-UP and do something!!!!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

David Russell
June 27th, 2007

The awful problems of Aboriginal communities are long standing and well known so I am aghast at the governments draconian and extremist response in the wake of "Little Children are Sacred" given 11 years of neglect on this issue. How then could I be blamed for being anything but cynical about this "plan"? I for one feel that it is yet another political stunt that can be likened to the Tampa. What sort of person capitalises on human suffering to further political ends? Not someone I want ruling my country!!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

LWilson
June 27th, 2007

I lived and worked among the aborigines and have always wondered if DOCS have any power in their communities.If so then the relative ministers/docs workers in all states and territories should be SACKED!!If DOCS dont have any power in said places,then enpower them..Oh sorry that would cost to much as you sure as hell wuoldnt find enough foster homes for the kids that needed them.Flat out finding enough for caucasian abused kids.MAYBE Bonzai Howard(little bush)could go and live with the native americans as a faq finding mission???

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Lynda Horton
June 27th, 2007

Just a few questions that keep reoccurring & being dodged by the Howard Government with sweeping generalisations;

Why has there been no consultation with indigenous communities & bodies, state governments & local support networks ? Is there any support in communities for rehabilitation & emotion & psychological assistance for victims ? And why as Malcolm Fraser recently pointed out don't we have any indigenous body in Australia ? Why don't you make policies on child abuse & child protection across the board of the entire Australian community (if one section ,i.e the indigenous is separated & laws govern there rights do they apply to the wider community) I thought that was racism ??
I doubt your government will answer any of these questions, but it's important for you to note as a voting member of the community I see the eroding of rights of all Australians as an issue. As do I see racism & a turning back to the 50's ideals as an issue.
Thanks
Lynda

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

ROD POWER
June 27th, 2007

Governments govern.
That is their role.
We do not need a taxi driver to get on tv and proclaim " i am driving my taxi"
Or, a doctor " I am writing a script to fix this patient"
Governments should do their jobs quietly, behind the scenes, without involving the plebs.
The Howard govt does not operate this way, talk about relaxed, what bullshit. We have to worry about terrorists, an illegal war, children overboard, asylum seekers, citizens being locked up for 5 years, awb bribes etc etc.
Times up for Howard!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Lee Emmett
June 28th, 2007

I suggested to the local ALP member that the 'crisis' is to do with values. A decent national political party would take a positive policy approach such as setting up an international university for indigenous studies, where Aboriginal elders would hold positions of respect for their expertise in culture and language. A national curriculum could then be established where indigenous values are an integral component of primary, secondary and tertiary education.

Aboriginal art, music and dance is valued by international collectors/experts, and the inherent value of a culture which has survived tens of thousands of years needs to be appreciated by all Australians.

The present national government has had three terms to identify problems, and suggest programs to improve the relative position of indigenous people. Life expectancy, deaths in custody, roll back of land rights, education, health, and any number of social measures have had the UN and other nations appalled at the injustice which our Aboriginal people have suffered, and continue to suffer in this 'lucky' country. However this government has chosen, just before the election, to focus its attention on negative values and is prepared to use a sensational power-grabbing manoevre which shows very little respect for indigenous communities.

Unless the ALP is prepared to commit to a genuine policy of truth and reconciliation in Indigenous affairs, and are only prepared to say 'me too' to the Liberals, they are allowing the government to get away with this immensely racist grab for power. I don't see any difference between the Tampa disgrace, the capitulation to 'One Nation' policies, and this current tactic of slurring Aboriginal communities: they are all appealing to the lowest form of racism.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

m.morgan
June 28th, 2007

My message is to the communitys GPS and the Defence force medical staff. Please do not conduct those compulsory medical checks. Only in the most sensitive environment, under a carefully planned program, should a young girl or a young boy be asked to expose their genitals to stranger. Have some respect.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Charlie
June 28th, 2007

Who benefits? The mining companies of course.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Denise McCubbin
June 28th, 2007

It is interesting that Mr Howard has seen "the light" with Indigenous health as it is near election time. It is worrying that he has sent in the troops and police "WHY"? Is it because he doesn't really want this initiative to succeed? I smell a dirty rat in this ill-conceived campaign as there was no consultation with the Indigenous Communities, and he seems to think the elders do not matter.

Has this come about because the mining companies need these aboriginal lands, or the government can have a clear conscience if this plan does not work because he gave his full support to "helping" the Indigenous Peoples. If Mr Howard was serious about the Indigenous People, which I hope he is, then why didn't he consult with all communities about their concerns, when he first came to power, and put proper policies in place.

Mr Howard does not want this to succeed as he cannot accept that Australia still has an Indigenous Race. It is a shame that he cannot accept them and include them in all decision making where the Aboriginals can feel wanted and accepted by all Australia.

The British have a lot to answer for. This is not the fault of our wonderful Indigenous Peoples of Australia.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Robert Sharkey
June 28th, 2007

The indigineous population of Australia has been abused (and neglected) ever since the white people came to this country. Given Mr Howard's past record I am deeply suspicious of his latest actions. I believe it is :
a) An election ploy; and
b) A ploy to take over aboriginal land to benefit the mining industry.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Gita D
June 28th, 2007

I saw a TV article of police pouring out grog onto the ground.
Big help!
My mum used to pour Dad's grog down the gully-trap (I'm that old) and it didn't make a damn bit of difference. He remained an alcoholic and just got more pissed off.
Howard's plan is not going to help the situation until they have rehab places to send these addicts to. Where are they? I haven't heard anything about the provision of such. And what about work/housing/education for those who need it?
I don't know how this heavy handed attitude to grog is going to protect the children. It's not just aborigines - mine was a white family and there are many white families who have the same (albeit not quite so obvious perhaps) problem. It is estimated that one in four kids is sexually molested - how about checking the white kids too Mr Howard! Can you imagine the furore?
And why is it just now - when Howard needs another Tampa type event - that the big guns are rolled out? I just don't trust that man's motives. He is incredible - using this awful situation to promote land grab/mineral wealth and headlines. The ugly face of Australia - look to our current leaders.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Carol Ahern
June 28th, 2007

The Federal Government has announced that it plans to abolish the Aboriginal land permit system, which allows senior elders to ban anyone from entering their traditional land.

The Indigenous Affairs Minister Mal Brough says the shocking cases of violence and sexual abuse in remote communities highlight the need for more public access and scrutiny on Aboriginal land.

But the decision has angered traditional owners who say they should have the same rights as any other landowner in Australia to ban trespassers.

The date of the above? Wednesday, 13 September , 2006 Oh yes, JWH, it's a national emergency, so much so that it has taken NINE MONTHS to take 'sudden' and decisive action. Remember only a day or so ago JWH stating that because of reading the Little Children Are Sacred report that he couldn't wait two seconds but had to immediately send in the police and the army.

The above quote is courtesy of: http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2006/s1739896.htm

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Gail Skipworth
June 28th, 2007

Child abuse comes in many forms and the most insidious is via pornogrophy and sexual equipment that young children become exposed to in their own homes from a very early age. Children express what they learn from their attachment figures during their play and this form of abuse is in all communities, especially the communities who have the money to purchase.
In all the rhetoric and publicity about the Problem there has not been raised "What do the Aboriginal people want?" If it is surmised that they have the problem, then the people need to be communicated with and asked how can "we" help.
All I see is a lot of big white men with big uniforms jumping in boots and until the election is over and then the Aboriginal communities will be left to pick up the pieces of lack of ongoing funding and support.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Paula Howard
June 28th, 2007

We have decided we needed to contact as many people as possible and begin to get the message out that what Howard and Brough are proposing is not the way to go.
Picture sixty Aboriginal communities in the NT floundering in the sea of national indifference for decades. Suddenly, in a time of political crisis for the ruling party, an emergency that has been slowly emerging during those decades is grasped and radical, ill conceived (and some would say entirely cynical) measures are imposed with expressions of general self righteous indignation and opprobrium at the behaviour of those communities in flinging themselves and particularly their children, into the waters of dysfunction.
Shame and blame are two powerful weapons of the dominant culture and can only spell a further deterioration in the conditions for Aboriginal communities. I urge you to contact your local politician and in all other ways help to bring to light the ill-conceived nature of the responses Howard and Brough announced last week.
Few would question some of the desired outcomes protection of children, greater participation, motivation and self-esteem. However, what has been proposed is short-term, imposed, misdirected and unsupported by decades of evidence of what works and particularly, what patently doesn¹t work. To make impositions on functional as well as supposedly dysfunctional communities make even less sense.
It is, of course, difficult for anyone to speak out as it is so easy to brand them as indifferent to the plight of abused children. It is also so easy and convenient to trample the rights of whole communities in the scramble to remedy a situation that has been known and ignored for at least the last ten years and has it origins 200 years ago.
Let¹s leave aside our cynicism about why this issue suddenly needs such focus and closely examine what is being proposed to see if it can be done and if it will work. First though, a word about situations where perceptions of child sex abuse may in fact be children exposed to sexual situations leading to assumptions that the kids are directly the targets.
This is not to deny that there are not situations of direct physical sexual abuse. However, the more common situation may be less shocking.
The average household occupancy in this community is 17 people. Houses are small, miniscule by McMansion standards. People mostly sleep on foam mattresses scattered around the floors with two, three or more to a mattress. People don't like to be alone anywhere - you don't go out without a couple of family or friends - too scary. Privacy is rare and children from their first years no doubt witness sex occurring in all its manifestations much as they do in all societies where there is communal sleeping. Therefore, the knowledge even very young children have about sexual acts is very much greater than in our single person per room culture.
In those circumstances it would be understandable that some young children might play act the scenes they witness most nights. Its also pretty lively in these homes at night with lots of people coming and going, tvs on, card games, lots of conversations and laughing. Kids don¹t get a lot of sleep sometimes. And it is pretty exciting with half a dozen brothers, sisters, cousins in your bed. If some of those brothers, sisters, cousins happen to be at the age of sexual awakening naturally there will be lots of Œinvestigation¹ and that may involve very young children. Not a good thing, but when you see how and why it arises you have an insight into how to begin to address it. It¹s hard to see how medical examinations will help, easy to see how improving housing will. Certainly pornography doesn¹t help yet we have been slow to do anything about it anywhere. Parent education and support is a big one too the collapse of communities has eroded parent¹s knowledge and authority. Dysfunction is passed from one generation to the next. Alcohol and other drugs are in the mix and need addressing see below.
So what are the proposals for this emergency of the last decades? Will they work? And if not these proposals, what?
1. Compulsory health checks for all aboriginal children under 16. Doctors and health clinics currently struggle to cope with the burden of chronic disease and primary health care needs. There are severe shortages of all medical staff in remote areas, just as there are in most rural towns across Australia. To draft in the legion of extra staff to conduct these tests requires simple things like accommodation there are no hotels, motels, no available rooms so it will require a building program or a tent city a building program is hardly within the emergency response time proposed. If its hard enough to attract medical staff with current incentives, the prospect of tent city is an unusual strategy to incline minds towards volunteering. So send in the army for maximum publicity, minimum impact.
Medical examination is one tool in identifying sexual abuse, patient and sensitive inquiry a more likely successful one. In many NT communities English is the second, sometimes third or fourth language spoken and not well understood by most people. Effective inquiry requires that the investigator not only speaks the primary language of those being investigated, but speaks it so well and understands the cultural environment so well as to be able to interpret the nuances of oral communication. And what do we do on discovering evidence of possible sexual abuse/activity?
Remove them from these situations? our foster care system for indigenous children is already at the point of collapse due to lack of places. There is no foster care in remote communities another branch of the family steps in but there are 17 or more in their household too! Do we reopen Colebrook and similar institutions of the past? Probably not a good idea.
Intervene in the family situation? Ah counsellingÅ . well yes Mal and John, do we have legions of culturally attuned social workers able to speak an Aboriginal language (at least one of the 13 dialects in this community) and ready to fly in to remote communities with sufficient on-the-ground knowledge to be able to understand the dynamics of the family and to know the best option for the child, motivated to stay in a tent city, and self-assured enough to feel protected from the anger of parents and relatives?
2. Linking welfare payments to school attendance in the long run not such a bad idea but to simply impose it in a short time frame ignores the inability of the education system to cope and the reality of many children who are not attending for very understandable reasons if you don¹t get much sleep the night before because of all the people partying in your room, if you are too shamed to go to school because you don¹t have adequate clothes compared to those who are at school (because you share all your clothes with everyone else your size in the house), if you¹re hungry in the morning and there¹s nothing in the house Œcause all those people eat anything as soon as its bought and anyway you can¹t store it if the fridge isn¹t working and no-one knows how to fix it. And your parents don¹t understand the importance of school they never went either.
Who will act as the truancy officers? The teachers great for building trust and rapport and great for personal safety too. The police they are going to be both very busy and very unpopular and at the moment community police spend a lot of their time cultivating trust and cooperation as they know that force will never control a community. Well then, let¹s employ truancy officers that would be a popular job likely to attract very suitable characters into a traumatized community wouldn¹t it? Don¹t fantasize that you could get community people to do this they would be even more at risk of reprisal than would an outsider.
If all school-aged kids did all turn up on the same day here, there are nowhere near enough classrooms, chairs, teachers and education resources.
The school needs to double in size. Right John, lets fly in a whole bunch of teachers but where do they stay? Tent city? And where do they teach?
And where are they now because the education system has been trying to recruit them for the last 10 years. Lets getting cracking with the building program, the training of teachers who want to work out here, the support for them doing what must be the most challenging teaching job in Australia. We might get somewhere in about 5 years minimum.
Education is central to improving Aboriginal communities. At present many community organizations struggle to find Aboriginal people with the skills and commitment to work in them. Sadly, after 50 years of schooling, training and apprenticeshipping there are very few young local Aboriginal people working in full wage paying jobs most are in work-for-the-dole CDEP positions and earning a Œtop up¹ for extra hours worked beyond the required 20 per week. CDEP promotes underemployment but it successfully disguises the high levels of unemployment in communities so Mal and John can quote a figure of only 13% unemployment for Indigenous Australians those of you who have visited remote communities - do you believe that? There are some older Aboriginal people who trained in the seventies and eighties who do have the skills and are the Health Workers, Rangers, Works Supervisors of the community. However, they are retiring, getting sick, dying from the burdens of responsibility for their communities. There are so few younger ones coming through to replace them. In this community there are training positions leading to full paid work in most organizations health, council, services, retail, industry and all struggle to get anyone local to apply, let alone complete. Balanders (whitefellas) do most of the work. Again, the reasons are complex and require long-term solutions. Attending, prospering in and completing schooling is the key. Blaming is no solution and only serves to undermine any remaining self-confidence a community may have. Force simply will not work.
3. Banning pornography not too many arguments there, but hey, that opens up a good black market doesn¹t it and with the roads open due to abolition of the permits system, there looks to be a few bucks to be made there. And let¹s not believe trafficking in pornography will be done only by Aboriginal people - there are plenty of very dodgy whitefellas in the Outback and Top End frontierland seems to attract them.
4. Banning alcohol on the surface it looks promising but our experience
over the last half century of dry communities is that:-
**People leave to drink in towns and cities, sometimes leaving children to be looked after by already overburdened extended family. Those who leave are often young to middle-age and who should be the backbone of the community.
**Black markets for alcohol, gunga, kava, petrol and other drugs quickly develop.
**Alcohol remains that elusive substance to be consumed in as great a quantity and at as great a speed as possible because it is expensive, precious, illicit and it does quell the physical, emotional and spiritual hunger, if only briefly.
Rather, we need programs that encourage responsible consumption of alcohol, where there are rewards for sensible drinking and sanctions for irresponsible drinking. We should also encourage (not impose) non-drinking as a best option (wouldn¹t that be a challenge to the alcohol industry in mainstream society). This community has one of the best models I have seen it would of course be a lot better if it had resources to back it up. Here, you can apply for a permit to drink up to two cartons of beer a fortnight, or 8 bottles of wine (for us balanders). You start off on light beer and if you go OK on that you can apply for full-strength after three months. If you bugger up any violence, breech of other rules (such as sharing with people on a ban), neglect, missing work too much, etc., you lose your permit for three months and have to reapply a committee of balanders and locals make the decisions. It¹s not perfect but is a realistic attempt to encourage responsible patterns of drinking. It¹s a long-term process at the moment the role modelling around alcohol consumption is very negative how can kids grow up with a different relationship to alcohol when all they see is binge drinking or their parents leaving them to go and drink in town.
Alcohol is not going away anytime soon so somehow and sometime Aboriginal people are going to have to learn other ways to deal with it.
5. Taking control of Aboriginal land and abolishing the permit system ahah, are we finally getting to the real agenda? Many Aboriginal people believe so and the evidence for them rests with the decision to abolish the permit system. It makes no sense to them to open communities up to a whole lot more people wandering in and out. Trafficking in alcohol, drugs, pornography and sex suddenly becomes a whole lot easier. It certainly makes no sense if indeed it is a ³crisis² normally a time when restrictions are imposed, not lifted. Look at our response to terrorism.
In their announcements Johnny and Mal talked vaguely of removing some of the rights of Traditional Owners, instituting different rent arrangements in remote communities (as distinct from outstations or homelands), moving towards individual land ownership. We all know that relationship to land is the defining difference between Indigenous and mainstream culture. There may be a case for changing some land arrangements in some places. However, there is little evidence available to encourage Aboriginal people to trust Johnny on this one. And there is ample evidence of the conservative agenda to deny the special rights and place of Aboriginal people in Australia .
One would hope that they will treat each community individually as there is such a diversity of experience and relationship in the different parts of Australia some communities may lend themselves to conversion to individual landholdings, in others it could spell the destruction of all traditional relationships and cultural values. Communities in Arnhem Land are very different to Noel Pearson¹s home community on Cape York. Here language is alive, culture is practiced every day. The Queensland Government of the past had a conscious and largely successful policy of eradicating language and much culture heritage.
The latest calls to arms for volunteers send shivers through communities - the last thing needed are ill-informed, ill-prepared and ill-supported hordes of volunteers descending on these communities to peddle their own brands of concern, judgement and condescension. You can't say this situation has not been known about for years - genuine volunteers are or have been here already.
There are solutions you have no doubt picked some of them up in the course of reading this. There are many more suggested by others more knowledgeable than me. Solutions require patience and cooperation, are long-term, difficult, expensive and achievable. We need a national commitment beyond the electoral cycle.
Please note these thoughts of mine follow barely a month in residence here I don¹t profess to have all the answers, some of what I say may well be misinformed but I, at least, am prepared to stand corrected. If you are in a position to speak out about this situation or to inform others, please grasp it.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Merv Nash
June 28th, 2007

Oh dear, the poor little aboriginal victims. The oldest race on earth that happily lived for thousands and thousands of years and hardly changed their ways. Then the big bad white man came along and showed them the error of their ways. How they should be educated and work and wear clothes and drink booze and praise his much better God. After all the white man has proved that his is the much better way just look at his wonderful history of wars and killing and culture and wonderful inventions like money and drugs and electronic surveillance.

Please go away all you do-gooders with all your theories of how to fix the mess made by your forebears and as you go make sure it includes all the wonderful pieces of your much superior civilisation that brought about the problem in the first place.

Yes, just go away and take all the stuff you brought with you including your houses and running water and sewerage everything else you insisted were better and make the aboriginal people totally responsible for the way they are and let them live entirely unsupported and the way they chose to live.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

James
June 28th, 2007

I am so heartened by all these responses and the passions I deeply share. As a long term activist on many issues now gone main stream, I beg you... please help main stream this and get Howard where he lives.

WRITE LETTERS to all the papers local, state and national, AND CALL THE TALK BACK PROGRAMMES please!!!

If every one of these responses were to slide across the editors desk at our major newspapers we might begin to see our views reflected in the media.

Since Howard is a populist poll driven opportunist, lets beat him at his own game and put our views out there in place of the vocal rednecks who drive his agenda.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Terry Ryan
June 28th, 2007

The PM says this is our cyclone katrina regarding aboriginal health and yes "HE IS OUR GEORGE BUSH"!!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Eloise Schnierer
June 28th, 2007

This is a land grab. It is a blatant land grab.

There is a state of emergency in remote Aboriginal communitites. We all know the issues. But these problems did not appear overnight. They are a result of years of deliberate neglect.

Army trucks? Forced medical exmainations to "check" for sexual abuse? We are talking about victims here. Victims who require great support and trust to come forward. There are complex psychological and cultural issues here. The environment up in NT is counter-productive to the needs of the victims.

So what is the reason for this whole macabe circus? Smoke and mirrors. Howard is using smoke and mirrors to deflect from what he really wants - Aboriginal land for mining and waste dumps. Aboriginal people have fought hard for those rights and continue to struggle for recognition.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Colin Walpole
June 28th, 2007

Here we go "Wounded Knee" all over again.

For Petes sake Prime Minister please leave people alone. We all know you want to rule forever but do you have to send the army and in to sort out the health of some hapless Aboriginal children.

Goodness me I have lived in a town where there were 80% Aborignals ans grog was a big issue but we were managing the problems quite well and that was back in 1989. We did that by treating everybody with respect and the simple belief that if we gave people the responsibility they could learn to handle their own problems.

All sending the army in is going to do is make the communities scatter into the bush, those that remain will accept what happens and then when the mission is over the army and the police leave result little change. Improvement is generational up there it is a long term process where people come to respect and accept two divergent cultures. it cannot be made by bring in the tanks just because opinion polls are low.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

James Wafer
June 28th, 2007

If you haven't seen it already, this article is worth a read.

Subject: Fwd: Howard's New Tampa


> Below is the text of an article by Jennifer Martiniello which will be
> forwarded to major newspapers in Australia. Please pass on to your
> networks. Jennifer Martiniello is a writer and academic of Arrernte,
> Chinese and Anglo descent. She is a former Deputy Chair of the
> Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander Arts Board of the Australia
> Council for the Arts, and a current member of the Advisory Board of
> the Australian Centre for Indigenous History at the ANU.
>
> Howard's New Tampa - Aboriginal Children Overboard
> Howard's new Tampa children overboard are our Aboriginal children.
> The Little Children are Sacred report does not advocate physically
> and psychologically invasive examinations of Aboriginal children,
> which could only be carried out anally and vaginally. It does not
> recommend scrapping the permit system to enter Aboriginal lands, nor
> does it recommend taking over Aboriginal 'towns' by enforced leases.
> These latter two points in the Howard scheme hide the true reason for
> the Federal Government's use of the latest report for blatant
> political opportunism.
>
> It has been an openly stated agenda that Howard wants to move
> Aboriginal people off their lands, and has made recent attempts to
> buy off Aboriginal people by offering them millions for agreeing to
> lease their lands to the Federal Government, e.g. Tiwi Islands and
> Tangentyere in Alice Springs. There was also the statement by the
> Federal Government that it could not continue (?!) to provide
> essential services to remote communities, which raised an uproar of
> responses in the press. The focus on the sexual abuse of children is
> guaranteed to evoke the most emotive responses, and therefore command
> attention, just like the manipulation of the Tampa situation. But
> while the attention of the media and the public is being emotionally
> coerced, what is being sneaked in under the covers?
>
> Two issues specifically - mining companies have applied for more
> exploration permits in the Northern Territory, the Jabiluka uranium
> mining operations at Kakadu have already hit the media because of the
> mining company's applications to the Government to significantly
> expand its operations, including establishing new mines at Coronation
> Hill, and another critical issue - nuclear waste. The Howard
> Government has already mooted that nuclear waste should be dumped in
> the Northern Territory, on Aboriginal lands. Aboriginal traditional
> owners are absolutely opposed to this. We have a long history of
> deaths and illness from radiation, from the atomic tests at Woomera
> in the 1950s to the current high incidences of carcinomas in the
> community at Kakadu near the Jabiluka site. The main obstacle to the
> Federal Government's desired expansion of mining operations in the
> Northern Territory and nuclear waste dumping is, of course, the
> Aboriginal people who have occupancy of, and rights under the common
> law to, their traditional lands.
>
> Following the stages of the Howard Government's usual modus operandi
> (defund, blame, eliminate), defunding of critical programs for remote
> Aboriginal community projects began in July 2004, with coerced
> changes to funding contracts, and monies for critically needed youth
> and health programs in remote areas being the first dollars to go.
> Take Mutitjulu for example, which was notoriously profiled by the
> ABC's Nightline program. I say notorious because one of Senator Mal
> Brough's personal staffers was the so-called ex-youth worker
> interviewed on that program, and the content of that interview was
> laden with myths and mistruths. The staffer in question failed to
> appear when summoned before a Senate inquiry to explain and the
> Senator's office is yet to issue a statement. When the community
> lodged a formal protest to Government, it was raided and their
> computers seized. But the program did show the effects of the Howard
> Government defunding of essential programs on that community, in
> particular the youth centre and health centre. The people at
> Mutitjulu also just happen to be the traditional owners of Uluru, one
> of this country's most lucrative tourist attractions. The Howard
> Government would not like us to ask who benefits by the people of
> Mutitjulu being forced off their community. Under the amendments to
> Native Title made by the Howard Government, once Aboriginal people
> have left their traditional lands, forcibly or otherwise, their
> rights under the common law that every other Australian enjoys over
> their land are significantly impaired.
>
> Progressive defunding of Aboriginal art centres has also begun, with
> a range of community art centres not having their funding renewed by
> DCITA in July 2005 and 2006 in the Northern Territory, from
> communities in Arnhemland to mid and southern Territory communities.
> The art production facilitated by those Aboriginal art centres are
> the only means through which members of those communities can
> actually earn a living, as opposed to being on welfare. But then,
> dependent people are easier to control by means of that dependency.
> The Howard Government's failed Shared Responsibility Agreements
> (SRAs) have also been the catalyst for further blame shifting and
> progressive defunding, take Wadeye for example.
>
> Our Aboriginal communities are being squeezed further into
> dysfunction and disenfranchisement by carefully targeted political
> engineering, the systemic and ruthless roll-out of a planned agenda.
> It is no accident that Howard's scheme to address what he calls the
> urgency of the Little Children are Sacred report's 97 recommendations
> was trotted out so very quickly, and addresses so very few of those
> recommendations. It is sheer political opportunism to advance an
> already in motion agenda, and to score points in an election year.
> After all, The Little Children are Sacred report is not the first of
> such reports, nor are its findings and recommendations new. The
> Federal Government has had the 1989, 1991, 1993, 1997 and 2002
> reports gathering dust and deliberate inaction on its shelves.
> Perhaps Mr Howard has been saving them up for a rainy election year?
> And of course Mr Howard's scheme targets only Aboriginal communities,
> despite the fact that the findings specifically state that non-
> Aboriginal men, that is, white men, are a significant proportion of
> the offenders, who are black-marketeering in petrol and alcohol to
> gain access to Aboriginal children. What measures is the Howard
> Government going to take about non-Aboriginal sex offenders,
> pornographers, substance traffickers and the like? Nothing according
> to the measures announced, but then, they're not Aboriginal and they
> don't live on the Aboriginal communities where their victims live.
>
> So who are the real victims here, the silenced victims of John
> Howard's scheme? Aboriginal children, of course, who will be subject
> to physically and psychologically invasive medical examinations,
> irrespective of their home and family circumstances, and who will
> deal with the mental and emotional fall-out from that? Aboriginal
> men, too, who become the silenced scapegoats, painted by default by
> John Howard as all being drunken, child-raping monsters. Perhaps the
> fact that almost every picture shown of Aboriginal men in the media
> these days shows them drunk, with a slab, cask or bottle under their
> arms leads Mr Howard to expect that one to pass unchallenged,
> irrespective of the fact that statistics show that only 15% of
> Aboriginal people drink alcohol, socially or otherwise, compared to
> around 87% of non-Aboriginal Australians. The greater majority of
> Aboriginal men are good, decent people. Perhaps the media would like
> to rethink its portrayals of Aboriginal men? How about some photos of
> the other alcoholics, you know, the white ones. There's more of them.
>
> And what of our communities? The Howard Government also hasn't
> mentioned that the majority of Aboriginal communities in the Northern
> Territory are already dry communities, decided and enforced by those
> communities. But then that would spoil the picture Mr Howard wants to
> paint of our Aboriginal communities. Other large communities, such as
> Daly River, have controlled the situation by only having alcohol
> available from the community's club and enforce a strict four can
> limit. Also forgotten in the current politically opportunistic furore
> is the fact that Aboriginal communities around Tennant Creek and
> Katherine have been lobbying Governments and town councils for
> decades to restrict the sale of alcohol on Thursdays, when Aboriginal
> community people come to town for supplies. So far their pleas have
> been rejected. Nothing in Mr Howard's plan to facilitate that,
> either. Or about the control of alcohol when those people, once
> forced off the communities into the towns, bring their problems with
> them, child abuse or alcoholism and all the rest. Of course that
> would make access to Aboriginal children a lot easier for white
> offenders, they won't have to go so far to find a victim.
>
> One last word on focus of attention. In the famous Redfern Address,
> the then Prime Minister, Paul Keating asked perhaps the most
> important question for all Australians to consider. He said 'We
> failed to ask the most basic of questions. We failed to ask - What if
> this were done to us?' What if this were done to us - to Mr and Mrs
> Average Australian, to our schools, youth centres, health centres,
> access to medical care, communities, homes, children, grandchildren?
> After all, current national health reports from a wide range of
> health organisations name sexual abuse of non-Indigenous Australian
> children as a crisis area in need of urgent attention. And the
> numbers of victims are higher. National reports into mainstream
> domestic violence, alcohol and substance abuse also call for urgent
> action, again the issues are at crisis level, and the numbers of
> victims and abusers are far higher than in the Little Children are
> Sacred report. None of the recommendations in all of those hundreds
> of national health reports recommend compulsory sexual health tests
> for every Australian child under sixteen. Not one of them recommends
> that a viable solution is closing down youth and health programs, in
> fact they all advocate that more are needed. None recommend that the
> victims' or the offenders' communities and homes should be
> surrendered to the Federal Government and put under compulsory lease
> agreements, and none advocate processes which would lead to either
> the victims or the abusers losing their rights under common law to
> their property as measure to control or remedy the occurrence of
> abuse. Would the Howard Government even dare to contemplate such as
> that? I think not. It would be un-Australian, and the Government it
> would expect immediate legal repercussions on the grounds of
> impairment of human rights, extinguishment of rights under common
> law, discrimination, and a raft of other constitutional issues.
> Besides, Mr and Mrs Average Australian don't, for the most part, live
> on top of uranium and mineral deposits or future nuclear waste dumps.
>
> But seriously, the most critical question for all Australians to ask
> themselves in the lead up to this year's Federal Election is just
> that - What if it were done to us? With full acknowledgment of what
> has already been done to workers, trade unions, student unions,
> public primary, secondary and tertiary education, elderly care,
> palliative care, medicare, crisis health care, nurses, teachers,
> multicultural affairs, migrant groups, women, child care, small
> businesses and artsworkers, among the many, through the exercise of
> policies of social engineering and fear, your answer at the polling
> booth may just determine whether it will be done to you, or continue
> to be done to you. As reported in the Sydney Morning Herald 25th
> June, the Howard Government last week used the military to seize
> control of 60 Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory, which
> are now under military occupation. This is not Israel and Palestine.
> The Northern Territory is not Gaza or the West Bank. This is
> Australia - but is it the Australia you thought you lived in? Walk in
> our shoes, Aboriginal Australia's, and ask yourselves, what would it
> be like to have this done to us? And then, walk with us.
>
> Jennifer Martiniello

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Sherry Stumm
June 28th, 2007

I am upset that John Howard has timed his intervention in an election year. It smells of political gain because it is hastily thought out and is draconian in its goals. Why disallow the system of permits on Aboriginal lands. This is a land grab by the feds and sure to upset aborigines. Then there is the invasive medical checks. How dare Howard be so blind to the fear and terror such checks will inflict on children already abused by adults and how dare he not understand that these children need all there medical problems checked and treated. I hope the doctors refuse this edict. Then there is the confiscation of 50% of welfare from all parents, disregarding good parents who care for their kids. Honestly I find it hard to not believe that Howard's motives are not based on altrusim and genuine concern. His heavy handed ill thought out emergency makes me ashamed that he is our prime minister frankly.
Aborigines need jobs that boost their self respect. They need doctors in their communities, health care workers who are aboriginal like their patients, they need elders the young can regard with respect because the government treat the elders with respect.
About the only thing I wholehearted agree with is the push to send children to school and to provide them at school and during the holidays, at fun camps, with nutricious breakfast and lunch. This would go a long way to improving their general health and making sure they are eating well.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

KL
June 28th, 2007

The landmark ATSI Taskforce report into Indigenous Family Violence in 2000 explicitly linked the horrific abuse on indigenous communities to the use of physical, sexual, emotional and cultural violence by colonisers. This report is considered the benchmark study in this area, and listed a series of recommendations that highlighted the need for community led, locally specific solutions to these problems.

Subsequent research and writing on this area has reinforced the finding of this report. This has resulted in the widespread recognition of the unique phenomena of family violence, which is characterised by it's direct link to colonisation and it's widespread impact across indigenous communities.

Family violence differs from domestic violence in it's manifestation, effects and root causes. It therefore requires a different response. Given the reality of deaths in custody, and the ongoing trauma caused by generations of forced removal and cultural oppression by government agents, heavy handed punitive intervention is at best paternalistic and at worst genocidal.

Generations of colonial oppression and genocide cannot be overturned through western military, welfare, judicial and medical systems. Too long have we failed to recognise the fundamental human rights of indigenous people to articulate and realise their future.

Let us not be fooled. This is less to do with children and more to do with global warming. Anyone looked at the map of mineral deposits and proposed waste dumps recently? Or wondered which bits of rock we are going to inject the captured carbon from our 'clean coal' plants? Wake up and smell the land grab Australia.



Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Eloise Schnierer
June 28th, 2007

To "SICK BASTARD",

How dare you accuse us of being sick? Many aboriginal and non-aboriginal people have been fighting for better services in NT to deal with the issue of sexual abuse and the many other problems facing aboriginal communities their whole lives. THESE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN IGNORED BY THE HOWARD GOVERNMENT FOR OVER A DECADE. This crisis is of Howards own making. Years of DELIBERATE neglect.

Howard know's the proper way to deal with these issues. He knows that it requires time and an extensive committment of resources - housing, policing, schooloing, econonomic development, empployment, rehab centre's and support for substance abusers etc.

But instead he ELECTS, he CHOOSES, to use prohibition and a military style invasion where victims may be forced to submit to medical examinations.

We are completely justified to criticise his choices. They are misconceived, short-term and designed to deflect from what he is really trying to do in the NT - Undermine land rights. This does not make us sick.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Penelope Langmead
June 28th, 2007

While I agree that equity and justice for health, housing and life opportunity has long beem unaddressed, the steps that have unfolded over the past two weeks or so, send chills down my spine and make me sick to the pit of my stomach. They are so strongly replicating the patriarchal model of go in - do to them - they will be fixed - of the government actions which resulted in the stolen generation.
Yet again, as with Tampa, as with Nauru, as with all the processing of refugees, as with Hicks, as with Iraq and the list continues, John Howard and his government are promalgating and funding insensitive, ignorant, one size fits all, fearmongering actions. They have led us so far back as a nation that this era under John Howard will surely be looked back on as very dark ages indeed. This is yet another step demonstrating their retograde, anachronistic, destructive approach, which not only will be a traumatic disaster for those they are targetting, but so seriously undermines and sets back the very good work and knowledge of the field which so many have caringly and painstakingly developed over many years.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

George W Currie
June 28th, 2007

Shame and blame are two powerful weapons of the dominant culture and can only spell a further deterioration in the conditions for Aboriginal communities. I urge you to contact your local politician and in all other ways help to bring to light the ill-conceived nature of the responses Howard and Brough announced last week.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Carolyn Green
June 28th, 2007

This is a hugely important iussue - however unfortunately, based on his track record I don't trust John Howard!! Why send in the armed forces? Why isn't there consultation with the Aboriginal people themseles? It is obvious that while the Gov't continues to try and impose solutions 'from on high' rather than empowering indigenous communities to think and act and take responsibility for themselves, it will never be anything more than a short term, look-good fix for Howard' Government
The most precious thing we could do for our indigenous peoples would be to give back their 'raison d'etre, i.e. provide quality education, meaningful jobs and a sense of purpose, etc.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

patricia beamish
June 28th, 2007

This situatiion has been going on for more than the years, than the Howard Goverment has been in, so im knocking all Politicians, for not doing their job in the first place, and this is not only happening in the, Indigenous Communities, but all Australians as well, OPEN YOUR EYES, and as for sending the Troops, HOW STUPID IS THAT, Learn Aboriginal ways first, and get Elders in there NOT TROOPS,Howard, Your only making the pot boil more by doing this, NEVER FORGET THESE PEOPLE ARE NATIVE AUSTRALIANS, Im Married to an Aboriginal, and My Husband thinks the same as me, Your Stiring a Hornets Nest By Doing This Stupid thing. BRING IN THE ELDERS TO HELP and Money wouldnt go astray either, Your only worried about the Almighty DOLLAR, when so many of our People need help, SPECIALLY Right Now, SO PLEASE OPEN YOUR EYES AND WAKE UP, THIS IS TO EVERY POLITICIAN OUT THERE, USE YOUR BRAINS, LEARN OFF THE ELDERS, FIRST?? BEFORE YOU GO JUMPING IN WHERE YOUS KNOW NOTHING ABOUT, THE PEOPLE AND THEIR CULTURE,
WAKE UP AUSTRALIA BEFORE ITS TO LATE, AND FIND OUT WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING, AND WHY IS IT HAPPENING, AND HOW YOUS CAN HELP, NOT BY TROOPS, GET REAL AND COME DOWN TO EARTH PLEASE, THANKING YOU,

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Anthea Downs
June 28th, 2007

John Howard - Have some respect for the people on the ground who has been working for years with these problems. Consult with the people who know the local situation. Use the reports that have already been written. Respect the Aboriginal people and their culture. This is an extremely delicate issue. Provide the type of support that abused women and children in the white community have access to. They dont need to be pushed around and subjected to invasive health checks, they need proper health services, community support agencies and enough local police to protect them when they ask for help. Sending in the army in crisis mode is just STUPID. What about providing the funding that is required within the normal process of government budgets? We live in times of great wealth and excess. Put the surplus money where its needed rather than into tax cuts for the wealthy.
Anyone can see that this problem requires a long term sustained effort over many years in many areas. Support these communities and give people a chance at decent lives.
And dont mess with Aboriginal land. We must surely know by now how important land is to Aboriginal self determination.
ENOUGH of these heavy handed policies. I hope we can stop this before more damage is done.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Patrick Ryan
June 28th, 2007

It's all about the childen. Right?

Well a few weeks ago reports started surfacing that the Howard govt had successfully lobbied Canada to end its support for United Nations (UN) Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Now this "emergency"- follow the threads below to see the greater picture.

"Howard to blame for Canada's Indigenous rights backflip: report" ABC News Online
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200706/s1947116.htm

This blog below gives an insight into what protections indigenous populations will lose as a consequence.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Barbara Reynolds
June 28th, 2007

What a cunning politician John Howard is - in the lead-up to the election finding a drama that can be played out nightly on our tv screens and discussed endlessly on talk-back radio. Underpinning all will be an unfortunate resonance with the racist attitudes of some in our community. Those people who believed that Muslims are not quite human and would throw their children overboard will also react with the belief that Aboriginal parents similarly don't care about their children and a heavy-handed intervention by our army will sort them out. This is indeed the "Black Tampa" and the parallels to sending of troops to Iraq are remarkable.
Indigenous health and education are indeed at crisis point. Somethin g everyone in our country should care passionately about. But there is no such thing as a quick fix. Consultation with all stakeholders is essential, as is a long term strategy and a significant increase in funding. Incentives to encourage our best doctors and our best teachers to work in these communities would also seem an essential component to success.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jemille King
June 28th, 2007

It's worth reading the first paragraph of the Recommendation section of the "Little Children are Sacred" report:

"In the first recommendation, we have specifically referred to the critical importance of governments committing to genuine consultation with Aboriginal people in designing initiatives for Aboriginal communities ..."

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Denyse Jones
June 28th, 2007

Another action by an authoritarian leader and government, without consultation with the Aboriginal community and its leaders, without considering the recommendation of the recent Report that there be consultation and due care in implementation of any actions. These are a fragile community, who have been neglected and considered by many as almost 'sub-human'. I feel concern, grief and also anger at the treatment of these people of Australia and their children.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Chayana Heffernan
June 28th, 2007

It is heartbreaking to be aware of the abuse and destruction that exists in our indigenous communities - and it is entirely embarrassing, and extremely painful to witness the government's responce. The government is showing a spectacular display of what it is to be a perpetrator of abuse. Our social apathy is equally discouraging. I see this policy in practice and desperately want someone to rescue these poor communities from this oppressive regime, and feel entirely helpless.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Trish McMahon
June 28th, 2007

Howard's timing of this "national emergency" and the grossness of his response to it just leaves me breathless.

The destruction of aboriginial culture, exacerbated by years of either meddling or ignoring, has caused this appalling situation. It cannot be remedied by the imposition of a multitude of white strangers however well-meaning these professionals of various disciplines may be.

Whites and blacks are sexually abusing children. Let us not forget this.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Patrick Ryan
June 28th, 2007

Make Sunday August 26th 2007, a national day of support for Indigenous communities.

Dear All

In the 12 months either side of my birth, saw the first man on the moon and the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. In Australia it saw the "Vote".

40 Years since the "Vote" and in the midst of an "emergency" caused in part by a lack of participation from a disinterested government. I feel it is important to reflect on what we should be aiming for as a Nation.

Tuesday 28th August 2007 will be the 44th Anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr. "I have a dream" speech. A speech which inspired many across the world to consider how truly civilised we really are.

It inspired Sydney university students to undertake a bus ride that challenged segregation across country NSW. And I suspect inspired many others to push for equal rights for the Indigenous population.

I ask that _Getup_ set aside Sunday August 26th as a National day of support for the Indigenous population. A chance to stand united against the excesses of the Howard governments "Initiative".

But it must be peaceful and it must bind us together as a nation.

I have attached two speeches which I feel should set the tone, from two great statesmen the likes of which we are yet to experience. (text/audio/video)

Martin Luther Kings "I have a dream"
28 August 1963
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkihaveadream.htm

Robert F. Kennedy, announces the death of Martin Luther King, Jr.
4 April 1968
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/rfkonmlkdeath.html

Play it - play it to your friends and play it to your children, pass this on.

I have my own dream, and I do not want to see all of our good efforts stumbled all over by a ham-fisted government desperate for an election edge.

I am not asking to put a man on the moon, I am asking that our government work within the law to provide consistent and continual improvements in health, education and housing.

If Australia is to be a truly great civilisation, it should last longer than the civilisation that was here before it. And we can only do that by ensuring we protect the rights and privileges of all of the Nations peoples, both young and old.

Let use Sunday 26th August 2007 to set that goal collectively as a Nation.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Mike Molloy
June 28th, 2007

I do not understand why there would be any need to take over the land rights of the indigenous to build/maintain houses or provide extra services. I am sure that done sensitively they would be pleased to welcome improved housing, heath facilities and schools. Indeed they have been asking for this for years!
This could all be done without taking over ownership of the land for five years. Perhaps there are other reasons for this? Could this have anything to do with their uranium and nuclear power station plans?
It is also extremely difficult to see how reducing payments can improve abuse levels in any way.
This plan is typical of those who see events in 'black' and 'white' terms, 'good' and 'evil'; rather than the reality of the more complex and subtle diversity of our world.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Tania McLeod
June 28th, 2007

I feel the Howard government is using the 'Little Children are Sacred'report to take back Aboriginal Land. Aboriginal people have fought hard to gain this right and suffered immensley, some Native Title cases have taken over 25-30 years to settle.
Why act now Mr Howard? All governments State, Territory and Federal have known about dysfunctioning communities for decades, this is not a new crisis, numerous number of reports have been conducted and presented to governments. Still nothing done 'Bring them home report' 'Aboriginal Deaths in Custody' are among them, both presented to governments with recommendations. Wonder how many the Federal governments over the years have acknowledged and implemented. Governments have under funded services for years in the bush especially for indigenous communities.
Is this a land grab so all the mining companies can come in to the Territory unopposed? Why do they have to change the NT Land Rights Act to help children? They are already sending in military and Australian Federal Police offiers. Why does the Howard govt. need hard fought for leases to provide services that main stream Australians take for granted.
Is this so the Fed Govt. can make the Territory a nuclear waste dump, well the states don't care as long as it is not in their back yard?
There is a serious need to act now to help some Aboriginal communities but this action was needed over 20 years ago and all the politicians know this already.
If you live in a big city down south or on the east or west coast and are against the way the Howard government is treating these citizens of Australia, please get on to the main stream media let them know that not everyone in Australia agrees with this 'heavy handed'approach to the crisis.
Howard has an alterior motive, he could of save Aboriginal Children a decade ago.

Don't be fooled again Australia.




Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.


Richard Ure
June 28th, 2007

"Actually. Many of us joined GetUp out of concern not just for Hicks, but for fellow Australians as well, so that you and I don't end up having our rights taken away by the Howard Government."

How does providing the services the rest of us rely in our own communities to preserve order i.e. the police service, amount to "taking away rights"? If part of a pension is provided as goods and services in kind, i.e. food and rent, instead of grog and drugs, is that a practical "denial of rights"? We send the army to places like Rwanda and the Solomon Islands then bath in the glory of the good, experienced work they do. But according to the comfortable nay sayers, these resources are to be denied our fellow citizens in our own country.

Do we really think our medical practitioners, many of whom seem to be volunteers, are incapable or inexperienced in dealing with the cultural challenges they probably see everyday in attending to the needs of our multi-ethnic nation? Are these people incapable of acting with the independence of mind necessary to treat their patients as patients rather than as pawns in a cultural war?

Is this debate representative of GetUp's membership or the doctrinaire, destructive baying of a noisy mob?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Robyn Muller
June 28th, 2007

Your comment
The Pm's plans for the Northern Territory's indigenous communities is at worst paternalistic, and at best using a hammer to swat flies.
Many of us are cynical of the motivation for his urgent interest in a problem he has been aware of for some eleven years. Citing Territory government inertia on the issue as the reason for "going in" now has questionable motives. I agree with those who believe that this is 2007's answer to the 2001 Tampa crisis.
Where is the detail for what the federal government expects to achieve. Where are the indigenous leaders on the think tanks and talk fests that one would expect to see? Has anyone asked the communities what they want - apart from the authors of the "Little Children are Sacred" report - and how they want it delivered?
In a lot of ways, indigenous Australia is another country, even countries, with a proud history of sorting out their own in their own way. White Australia has ridden rough-shod over all of them for so long and continues to do so. The one-sizd-fits-all approach will not do here.
Let us hope that wise heads get the ears of the bureaucrats and real things start to happen, and then continue on into the future. This is a generational problem which may take a generation to fix. We need to be here for the long haul, with ears, hearts and wallets open if there is to be real change for the better in the communities these people live in.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Grayson Slater
June 28th, 2007

Howard's manufacturing of a defocussing and devisive circumstance should come as no surprise to anyone. Those will remember his opportunistic hijacking of the Port Arthur trajedy to promote himself as the strong gun control leader. They will aslo remember the innacurate and immoral vilification of the regugees in "the children overboard" misrepresntation. Now we are to vilify Aboriginal communities as being singled out as child abusers! All seems to familiar to me!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Celia S
June 28th, 2007

firstly, i would like to emphasise no matter how "tough" the government is planning on being, this will not stop them using it. Just as with banning drugs, it will only make alcohol more valuable in the underground. What needs to be done about Aboriginals is firstly, opportunities given to change their lifestyle. Not just the scholarships, but things like rebuilding their villages, and their small towns to better standards.

This is a long term project. The government needs people willing to not only source the prblem (eg realising the kids are unhealthy/raped/abused ect) but be willing to fix it!

Finally taking the children away will not help! This is stolen generation all over again! Once again Australia is deciding we are superior, taking them away will fix them. This proved to have a physocological affect on the children then, and it will now!
What we need is to stop the abuse, by educating the parents/elders.

With the medical tests, i have a feeling abuse will be finally proven. What we need to is doctors and preferably social workers and guidance councillors, for children and the parents.

Comment back on me if you want at devil_bitch91@hotmail.com label email Aboriginals

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

DENI LANGMAN
June 28th, 2007

After years of requesting proper funding from the Federal Howard Government, PM Howard continues to ignore these requests.
In my oppinion, PM Howard has failed miserabely as PM of the Aboriginal Communities across Australia, by his ignoring Indigenous people's requests for proper funding of Health Care, Housing up-grades and Education.
The nullifacation of Elder's authority, that Mr. Howard has implemented by his new rushed laws today is disregarding the Indigenous culture and sensitivity of the way of life in remote areas.
Certainly there is a need to address the problem of child abuse and drinking in the Indigenous Communities, as well as the white communities.
In Indigenous Communities, the problem is not drinking alcahole alone but a result of financial dependance on Government funding in every sphere by the Indigenous people.
I feel that the Howard Government purposefully brought about this present situation in the remote areas, by underfunding medical care, housing and not providing educational facilities for the indigenous population, during the entire 11 years of PM Howard, in office.
It is Mr. Howard who is directly responsible for the situation today and he hasn't learned how to fix the problem. He barges in with police and army to control Indigenous Communities, reminding all Indigenous people of the "Stolen Generation" years of the '30s to the '70s.
Many Indigenous people fear that disgraceful time returning.
Where is the money for rehabilitation centres and shelters for the abused and money for proper health care that the indigenous people need so badly and where is the money to build educational facilities for Indigenous adults and children and where is the money for proffessional people to work with the Community Elders?
Mr. Howard's plan of action as it stands now is extremely damageing and distructive. There is nothing in Mr. Howard's plan to continue helping Indigenous Communities and it very much sounds like there is ulterior motive that Mr. Howard has kept secret.
With "hit and run" actions as forceful as Mr. Howard's action, it is no wonder we Aboriginal people will never trust his motivations.
His declaring that Indigenous children are dear to his heart is unbelievable when for 11 years or more he has not given any consideration what so ever to our children.
Sexual abuse of children and abuse of adult women is a serious crime and needs immediate attention. Where was Mr. Howard and Co. 11 years ago? AND
Where was and where is the money to address these problems today?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Helen Dow
June 28th, 2007

Its Tampa all over again.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Robin McPherson-Bruce
June 28th, 2007

Can't comment, still too damn angry @#$%

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Carolyn Hay
June 28th, 2007

Apart from the blatant political agenda of this outrageous move, I am concerned about the use of Federal Police, Australian Defence Force troops and other professionals with neither training in Indigenous affairs or culture, nor an awareness of sensitivities necessary when dealing with Aboriginal people, which can only be gained from experience, let loose on these innocent and simple people.The Federal Government has had more than a decade to gradually and systematically put in policies which would support these people with education, employment and pride in their heritage. Instead, almost all the Social Justice programs of the 80s and early 90s have been eroded. Are we fooled? No!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Bryan Lewis
June 28th, 2007

Hmmm,

I smell an Election in the air.

Children Overboard, truth overboard...

ANYTHING TO MAINTAIAN POWER (One's prerogative, when one is BORN TO RULE)

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

colin gradolf
June 28th, 2007

G’day all,
It is difficult for me to express to you how much I loathe John Howard. Every mannerism and phrase; action and reaction; comment and argument raises my hackles- and then he buys back the guns.
What do I do? Labor couldn’t have done it. “So what?’, you say. You’re right; but now, at just the correct political moment, he’s done it again.
This time he’s drawn a line in the sand; a different challenge to the nation- to Get Up off our collective arses and put our actions where our finely honed cynicism and integrity lead us.
If , as I’ve read, we all fear hidden and political motives from the Lying Rodent let’s Get Up and take it off him.
The line is drawn. He has inadvertently created a defining moment in our history as a nation and people. If we let this slide, who are we?
If we fear paternalism let us consult. If we fear insensitivity let us go and be sensitive. If we fear domestic violence let us go and protect. If we fear child abuse let us offer our homes as sanctuary.
Get Up has a reputed 180,000 members. We get together online and pat ourselves on the back for our capacity to scare and influence government. Among our number we must be able to list all kinds of skills vitally necessary to this task which we cannot afford to fail.
Let’s Get Up and do it.
If not who are we?
Regards Col Gradolf.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Andrew Thorogood
June 28th, 2007

Up here in Darwin there are many, especially Aboriginals who have grave misgivings of Howards plan and agenda. We know one thing about the Howard govt - you cannot trust anything they say, anything they promise, they are capable of doing anything and do not care of consequences and have never been interested in social issues. In short we all know this is an Election Stunt at the expense of aboriginal communities. You can join some debate here:
http://www.ozelection2007.info/forums/viewtopic.php?id=34&p=5

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Andrew Thorogood
June 28th, 2007

There needs to be an independant observer at every community - I do not doubt the govt will find a way to force sexual abuse examinations on people - there are many ways to control and manipulate people and the Howard govt has no conscience on these things.
In fact where are the normal sentinels of our democracy gone? You know - independant, critical and intelligent press and tv? Howard treats democracy like a lame dog.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Robynne Burchell
June 28th, 2007

Like so many others on this forum I am deeply suspicious of the motives of the Kirribilli squatter. Having ignored the numerous reports that have been presented during his encumbancy this matter has now become an emergency. In fact an emergency so great that it requires no less than a MILITARY response. Khaki is always a great election colour. But even more disturbingly, it has been revealed that the only way to protect aboriginal children is to steal their land. Yes, taking away their land is the only possible way that we can protect them.
Land grab using child protection as a front. Loathsome.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

anne o donovan
June 28th, 2007

My overwhelming response to the Federal governmments response to child abuse in the Northern Territory is to ask, Why?
Why just aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory, when there is widespread abuse across all sectors of Australia (and I have witnessed this in many areas, through my work in the area of health)
And why, does this response, parallel discussion and policy, connecting welfare and child care (unmatched in other sector of Australian society)
And why, has a military and paternalistic response been adopted, in particular given the history for Aboriginals in Australia (having caused division and in families and communities)
And why now? when there have been reports of child abuse in Aboriginal communities and many other communities, for years.
Why now? in an election year, with a new potential government and prime-minister? when issues such as climate change, Australia's role in Iraq and Industrial Relations are lurking in the shadows?
And when a government who (not unlike governments before them, on both side sof politic) would relish more power over the states and territories.
And lastly and most sadly, why is there not a wider, more outraged response to this authoritarian and violent action to the people of the Northern Territory, to a section of the people of Australia?
As an immigrant to this country, I can only conclude, that either the residents of this country sanctions almost any governmental response, militaristic or otherwise (take the Tampa, Pacific Island solution and Iraq as exapmples) or that the Aboriginal sector of the Australian community live under different opinions and rules to the rest.

Anne

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jeannine Farrell
June 28th, 2007

You all have something precious that should be valued.... It is called a vote. Use it well. Use it wisely. Do not allow yourself to be swayed by the 'good news' stories that will be forthcoming over the next few weeks. Remember, from little things, big things grow.... allow these sweet innocent children to grow up in a caring sharing Australia and be productive, happy people in society. Indigenous people have been used as play things for too long by governments. Stand together and fight Australia!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Angela Jones
June 28th, 2007

Very interesting reading- I have been aware all my life of the many problems and concerns in indigenous communities in Australia-( I have lived most of my life in Melbourne so have been rather cocooned or could have been had I not been aware - I have only been proactive to the extent of lobbying MP's and writing letters etc. signing the odd petition over many year)-Every single horror that has come to pass under Howard I think was horribly predictable= all of his appalling policies over the past 11 years, however voting is compulsory in Australia and as they say= 'you get the Government you deserve'After each election I was dumbfounded that people could not see him for what he really is.
I have always felt that so called Aboriginals should not be a separate people; there is surely no future in that- The same as if a white community wanted to live separately they should be able to, but must be totally independent and therefore not able to claim any benefits, economic, medical or cultural, from the society they so despise.
People need to work together as we all know, once upon a time in England 5-6 year olds worked in coal mines and swept chimneys.I feel quite sure many people then belived the situation was impossible and that they themselves were powerless to do so

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Travis Gilbert
June 29th, 2007

It is difficult to know exactly where to begin when considering one's response to the unprecedented and overtly "big government" response to reports received by the PM and I.A Minister in which many heart-wrenching accounts of physical and sexual abuse were documented. The report warrants an immediate response; the graphic accounts of rape and sexual assault, paedophilia and the spectre of continuing alcohol and other drug related social problems demand an urgent, co-ordinated response. Forgive me however for not being convinced of the sincerity of the PMs sudden "deep concern" for indigenous communities. As a politically aware and (as I rapidly learned under JWH) blissfully naive activist who read the "Bringing Them Home Report" from our school library and was reduced to tears in many sections. Upon hearing on the news that the PMs staff had canvassed it as had JHW; I was certain our PM would begin his response...

"...The testimonies contained in the Bringing Them Home report cannot be ignored. The policy of forcibly removing Indigenous children from their biological parents and kinship group has caused and/or contributed to a range of intergenerational consequences that have destroyed the cultural and spiritual relationships of Indigenous people to their traditional lands and ancestral dreaming sites. Words cannot express how sorry I am on behalf of this parliament and my fellow Australians..."

Months passed and still no acknowledgement of one of the most openly heart-wrenching reading experiences of my life as unacceptable and a scar our history books seldom sought to touch on... Let alone saying "sorry".

I had the privelege of attending a Youth Reconciliation "Forum For The Future" in Darwin in 1998. Through a series of workshops and plenary sessions we devised and drew up a charter for Reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian youths. It was presented to parliament. Carmen Lawerence responded as did 2 ALP senators, Democrats and the sole green at the time. Nine years on and I have no knowledge of a response other than Minister Herron acknowledging having received our charter.

I do think we all have to unite to make whatever positive contribution we can through our social networks to maximise the gains for Indigenous children and their communities. Simultaneously, as informed people I think it is equally prudent that all legislative amendments are closely examined, particularly pertaining to the NT Land Rights Act and the exercise of Commonwealth power over areas currently managed by land councils and like bodies.

I believe the PM genuinely wants to end the exploitation of children and physical and sexual abuse and is motivated by concerns over the welfare of children. This does not mean that the PM is above beying influenced by mineral industry lobbyists. I urge concerned progressives to be alert and alarmed if we notice any signs of corporate interests potentially using the highly political palatable "I'm saving the children" venture to lobby government for amendments to the NT Land Rights Act that facilitate the expansion of operations in and/or around Indigenous Lands.

I sincerely hope Indigenous people aren't used as a political footy. They deserve to be listened to and respected, thus far few "leaders" have managed that. We're gonna have to do it from the grass-roots up, I reckon, not with cops and armed forces as the centrepiece. My only proposal would involve empowering women in all communities but I am not Indigenous and I reckon we've dictated to 'em for too long about how to live in a land they've raised kids in at least 40 000 years longer than anyone in parliament can trace their 1st generation Aussies. PLEASE INCLUDE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE AT EVERY STEP OF THE RESPONSE PROCESS AS IT UNFOLDS PRIME MINISTER. WE'VE IGNORED 'EM FOR TOO LONG ALREADY.

Travis

HAWTHORNDENE, SA

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

s ridout
June 29th, 2007

Here's a recent article that's right on the money re the latest howard move and this point of view needs to get more coverage.

Long-serving Sydney political journalist Alex Mitchell writes:

This is the last throw of the dice for John Howard. He is doing one big favour for the mining industry which he has faithfully served in public life for the past 30 years by rolling back Aboriginal ownership of their tribal lands. Cynically, cruelly but utterly predictably, he’s doing it under the hypocritical colours of humanitarianism. (Very similar to the invasion and occupation of Iraq sold as “spreading democracy”). In his four terms as PM, he has starved indigenous health, education and housing of funds, abolished ATSIC and pointedly marginalised the Aboriginal Affairs portfolio. This particular pre-election pitch is aimed at Lateline viewers, readers of The Age and The SMH and ABC stalwarts, the demographic that constitutes Australian (small “l”) liberalism. These are the feeble-brained, hand-wringers who are congenitally incapable of separating the wood from the trees. They are types currently heard sobbing: “I’m no fan of Mr Howard, but at least he’s DOING SOMETHING!” Yes, he is: he’s giving the mining giants the leg-up they need to start exploring, digging and quarrying in indigenous lands in the Northern Territory and then elsewhere. He is being aided and abetted by Kevin Rudd’s craven behaviour. Instead of falling into line with Howard’s agenda, he should have demanded complete details of the plan, the highest-level briefing, sought face-to-face meetings with Aboriginal leaders, state premiers, police and army officers and taken the lead in a national debate. Instead, he mouthed pieties such as “I’m taking Mr Howard at his word” and “I believe the Prime Minister when he says he is responding to a national crisis” etc etc. Has anyone realised that these are almost the same words used by Kim Beazley when he backed Howard during the Tampa scam? By his pusillanimous approach, Rudd has vacated leadership on the tragic issue of rescuing Aboriginal communities and given Howard the opportunity to play his sickening Father of the Nation role. Paul Keating, you were right about the Rudd team of fixers, hucksters, flyweights and spineless opportunists. Alex Mitchell

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Ken Eckersall
June 29th, 2007

The ramshackle plan of recruitment of personnel for addressing the crisis (albeit with good intentions) is indicative of the government unpreparedness. Of course the government had known of degraded conditions in such Aboriginal communities for years. It makes you wonder what is Australia's state of preparedness for other crises which will inevitably arise because of global warming and the government's failure to curb greenhouse gas omissions. Little Children are Sacred must not become a diversion.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

cleis Pearce
June 29th, 2007

When I read all your comments I am so thankful I am not alone in my distress at what is happening in our country and I wonder if most people in Australia support Howards policies .Are we Get Up subsribers just a bleeding hearts minority and we have to helplessly watch our country and community raped and pillaged again.. how do we survive this?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

John Host
June 29th, 2007

Anyone who appeals to John Howard’s sense of decency should wake up and smell the coffee: he doesn’t have a sense of decency! He knows that laws are designed to protect the powerful and when they don’t, he ignores them if he can. His new-found concern for Aboriginal children is as cynical as his political spin. Who recalls all his broken electoral pledges - the infamous non-core promises – and who’s kept track of his lies about Iraq, Tampa, refugees? The real measure of the PM’s concern for Aboriginal children is the effort he’s poured into undermining the UN declaration on Indigenous rights. As others have pointed out, he’s pulled the latest stunt for two reasons: to give Aboriginal land to mining interests and to gain an edge in the forthcoming elections. It’s Machiavellian and it’s effective. People all over the place are saying ‘at least Howard’s doing something about the child abuse’. Normally intelligent adults are unmoved by his disregard for ‘legal niceties’ and don’t even bother to check whether the story of chronic abuse in Aboriginal communities is true or not. Well people should start asking questions, for their own sakes! When Howard’s disposed of Indigenous rights he’ll return to his assault on civil rights. When civil rights are gone it’ll be too late to ask questions, and don’t think the Labor Party will help – when it lost its soul it lost its mind and its ticker! Like the government, it’s been highjacked by the neo-cons and the fault is ours. We elected the lot, government and opposition alike! So what can we do to change things? We could begin by promoting Get-Up’s fight to reclaim the Senate. We could read more and be better informed. Those of us who’ve done so know that most of the government’s claims about Aboriginal child abuse don’t stand up. We could start thinking for ourselves. It’s safer than believing what we’re told. We might even make a difference at the election if we haven’t become so self-absorbed that a collective effort is no longer possible. At the very least, we should remember that Aboriginal Australians are fellow citizens. If their rights can be trampled, so can ours.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.


Deborah Porter
June 29th, 2007

In my opinion, The Liberal Government did'nt give a damn about the Indigenous people and their terrible problems until this became an Election year, now Howard wants to help them?? This is purely an Election ploy to get the Liberal Party back into Government and I'm not buying it at all!! They did'nt way to help them last year!!
I have ALWAYS voted Labor and I hope that, if they get in this year, and it's looking good, they will treat the Indigenous people as they deserve to be treated......as human beings, and please protect the children!!!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Ben Miller
June 29th, 2007

There are numerous postings referring to "consultation" with communities etc. Having worked in the "Aboriginal industry" you can substitute the word consultation for "meetings" and, in practice, that means years of talk and no action while the Aboriginal elite get paid sitting fees and consultancy fees while the community suffers.

The opposition to this policy is largely driven by hatred of Howard rather than concern for aborigines, or concern for the consultative process.

The problems facing Aboriginal communities can only be solved by strong discipline... that is individual community members being disciplined enough to say "I'm not drinking tonight, I have to go grocery shopping tomorrow" and discipline by authorities to police crime without the spectre of political correctness clouding their application of Australian law.



Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Peter Lipscomb
June 29th, 2007

How (Why) Can They Get It So Wrong

I work with early teenage boys raised in a middle class community by parents who don't care, are too busy who may be alcoholic, dependent on drugs apathetic and here I see the damage and neglect perpetrated against our white children, the lack of structure in their lives, the appalling lack of respect for education, their lack of interest, their apathy to life. This often results in violence, drugs and serious crime.

Little wonder then that remote communities of aboriginal communities that have suffered neglect for so long have "social" problems. I see positive results when some of my "boys” are given attention, direction respect and a need to learn.

Now all of a sudden our Prime Minister and Mal Brough are throwing bucket loads of money and radical paternalism at the "problem".

We have known of most of the "issues" for years. What did we expect when their cries for help were unheeded?

If you want a community to fall apart rather than heal this is the way to proceed.
Implementing measures like shortening the contract times for many aborigines on the CDEP program from 12 months to 3 months and giving communities 20 days to sign up to the new requirements frightens people who are most vulnerable. These are people who have been working for their pay in meaningful jobs. Does John Howard want then to join the despairing so that he can impose his draconian regime on them too?

Sure there is alcoholism and drug abuse in these communities. White people have been profiting by carting truck loads of alcohol into the aboriginal towns for years. Governments of both persuasions have stood by and watched. We blame the aboriginal people for this. How much blame should we shoulder? What would have been the difference if good food and medical help had been sent instead of grog? And now how will the government keep the grog runners and other white profiteers out of communities without a permit system?
What will happen to alcoholics when a ban is introduced?

What would be the outcry if John Howard announced that the same measures of taking the land and homes of white families in his electorate because they get drunk beat their wives and abuse their children? The current law is sufficient for us and it should be sufficient for the Aboriginal communities. The problem is though that we have not given them the police and welfare workers to implement the law.

The aboriginal communities need people and resources to assist them to heal. They need a meaningful existence. They do not need the threat of the army and police. They do not need the fear and insecurity that is being imposed by the current government in the name of child protection.

The timing of these latest exercises is too convenient to be true. Howard is grabbing land with no promise of return, just some token compensation payment. What chance have these people had of negotiating reasonable agreements? What value does money really have compared to land tenure? Money can so easily slip away.

This is like John Howard’s rush into industrial reform with all the problems and faults that have emerged because of insufficient planning only this is much worse. This is attacking the core being of a race that has been neglected at the best and under siege at the worst.

What has child abuse to do with land ownership and the reorganisation or demolition of many structures that have been working? A great wave of child and adult abuse is about to be perpetrated on a scale not seen before by those who are supposed to be building a society that is able to nurture and protect all Australians.

One could wonder if the real reasons could be economic, valuable minerals, places for radio active and chemical dumps and other projects where negotiation with indigenous owners becomes too difficult or just that our Prime Minister knows better and is now given the opportunity to push his radical ideology through before he looses the absolute power of having both houses of parliament at the next election.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Barbara Dutton
June 29th, 2007

Just seen the film "Kanyini",made by Melanie Hogan with Bob Randall, who appropriately is from Uluru. It would be good if every Australian - especially insensitive politicians - could see this wonderfully generous spirited account of our Aborigines before and since colonisation.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

RJohn Carter
June 29th, 2007

With the announcement today of a Queensland Government initiative that was evolved by, and in consultation with, an indigenous lawyer, Noel Pearson, it would seem that the Government's initiative was a heavy handed knee-jerk response in the face of falling electoral opinion.

After 10 years of inaction, why such a sudden and provocative approach? Noel Pearson can't have been developing his proposal in a vaccuum. My daughter commented, "Too little, too late". My added comment is, " And too much, too quickly".

Long-term, consultative and cooperative initiatives, that are community based from the outset, would seem to be the answer to a situation that varies from community.

The people are now commenting that they have been asking for assistance for years. Where have the politicians and political will been for so long?

The news report last night on the first community that was visited, clearly shows that the Federal Government appointed Administrator who replaced the people's Council has been inactive for 12 months.

Do I hear sounds of "children overboard"? Sadly, this situation is only too real in some communities, but the lack of reaction until close to the polls, reveals what appears to be a sad deriliction of duty on the part of the Governments, Federal and State, and all politicians.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Paul Woodcock
June 29th, 2007

The issue is urgent and must be addressed but once again Howard's government has come out with ideas that have not been thought out. In the short and even the medium term where does he get the medical staff, the police and the general support staff which will make a difference. The government has said it wants to change the culture. You can't change culture in 6 months and even less so if you don't involve those who are most effected by the decision making and in the long term process.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Linda Evans
June 29th, 2007

Dear Getup Members, I am so shocked and horrified that this Federal Government is 'taking over" Indiginous communities and their land under the guise of 'protecting the children'. How coincidental that it happens to be an election year. If that was their true purpose why are they not sending in health nurses, councillors and teachers and inproving the third world living conditions that these people have been left to live in for years. These people, our indiginous brothers and sisters are not given the same freedoms that we have, even now after 200 years of oppression. How dare Jonh Howard not consult with Indiginous leaders and communities on what they need. Surely its support, understanding, proper shelter (a basic human right) and health care that would be so much more beneficial. Not men in uniform. As an Australian I feel ashamed and embarrased.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Emma Leu-Marshall
June 29th, 2007

While I don't agree with the method of Howard's actions, I do agree that action needs to be taken. I agree with many of the comments here, including those of the 'too little, too late, and not enough' vein, and that change needs to come from within the community itself.

However, I would like to add, that since the policy has actually been implemented, I think that things are changing. The fact that communities appear to be consulted about what services they feel they require 'on the ground' by the assessing force is reassuring. Making child health checks voluntary is another positive step. It seems that the forces sent in are thinking more of the people than strictly of the task given to them!

It will still take time and a dedication of resources to achieve the goals set out for Indigenous communities. The road will be rocky, and full of twists and turns, but I believe that this is perhaps the beginning of the change, and I have been more reassured with what's actually happening in communities compared to what was said to happen when first announced.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jean Menere
June 29th, 2007

Don't the stupid crew KNOW that in every ghetto there will be hopelessness, the panacea of grog, and for what particular reason, mostly undefined, there will be violence towards women and little children?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Füzzy
June 29th, 2007

I se parallels between the war on terror in Iraq and the war on domestic violence in the indigenous outback. Both will be doomed to failure in the long run if policies get generated ad-hoc. Failure though means social disasters.
I highly question the timing, especially since those polls about him vs. Mr. Rudd aren't looking any prettier the closer this country moves towards election mode.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Daryl Wark
June 29th, 2007

Finally som one is saying something!!!!!!
I am appalled by not hearing anything in the press about what the government is doing "addressing this issue". What sort of damage this will cause in the indigenous communities is unparalleled in modern history. The children if now are not sexually abused most certainly will feel like they have been after examination by "White Law makers". Again we want to take power and just do what we think is the way to go with out giving it a second thought. Disaster for the short, medium and long term effects this will have not only on this indigenous community but the race as a whole, God are we that stupid. Lets think before we act! Abuse is not to be tolerated especially when it comes to children. But John Howard way is not the answer. He has waited 11 years why could he not look at a better "role out" to handle this deeply ingrained cultural problem. A solution to the problem in "less than a week". He has picked the top off a sore on a artery, how will we as a nation now stop the bleeding.
I am disgusted to think what the rest of the world thinks of us.
More people need to voice there opinion, the silence is deafening. Daryl Wark Brisbane, Australia

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Patrick Ryan
June 29th, 2007

The delay is selling the ideas to the public bodies who have the resources we need. Some bureaucracies are flat out performing their internal duties. Others do not have the mechanisms to process commissioned reports let alone handle grass root ideas. Others are too busy funding flagpoles.

Hatred of John Howard, I will give you that point. Only because I have seen how Howards methods have split the nation everytime. Howard has shelved report after report while trumpeting record multi billion surpluses.

My greatest fear is that the wider community may see John as a decisive hero when his inaction was instrumental to the crisis.

They had the time to consult, the time to develop infrastructure. To develop joint task forces. He had time to work with the states and territories. We know because we have been achieving victories on our own.

After 11 years we all have the right to ask John Howard's government "where the bloody hell were you ?"

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Ned Kelly
June 30th, 2007

It's Tampa all over again! I expected something like this, even worse, maybe some sort of Australian version of 9/11, but I hope the Australian public will recognise that we do not need another Tampa and another decade of political "sex, lies and rock and roll"...

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

pamela bourke
June 30th, 2007

I have just spent 2 years in NZ and I am coming home.
The gulf between what I have experienced here and in Australia is so wide!

For the last 2 years I have seen what an alternative and much more enlightened approach to indigenous affairs looks like. It isn't perfect but it is so much better than what we have in Australia as it is based on a foundation of respect, reparation for injustice, truth about the past and willingness to support Maori people to determine their own future. Maori people are reclaiming their culture and language and running their own businesses and schools and universities. They are telling their stories and they are proud to be Maori! They have their own political party. There are still many problems but here it really feels like the changes are coming and there is collective national pride in Moari culture.

We could take this journey in Australia if we wanted to. It isn't just about John Howard but about all of us. We have all known about the terrible injustices done to Indigenous Australians for a long time. We have to want a different future and be prepared to fight for it and not just at the ballot box but in our every day relationships with Indigenous people in Australia.

I am glad this is an election issue!
It gives us a chance as a nation to say we have had enough and we want to build a different future and relationship with Indigenous Australians and we are prepared to pay more tax and forego some other priveliges to make it happen.
Let's tell all the parties that this is one of the most important issues facing our nation and it needs to be given a very high priority and better funding, and a very creative response with Indigenous Australians in the lead not cynical and racist politicians.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

janet melius
June 30th, 2007

We all agree that the living conditions in many aboriginal communities is woeful,substandard,and in some cases dangerous.We agree that "something must be done".Yet isn't this lastest fiasco proposed by our federal government(convenently in an election year)just another example one group imposing their values onto another group(by force).
For many years i have been wondering: "Where are the leaders of these people?"
Yes i recognize the good intent of,and effort of Mr.Pearson,but for these dysfunctional communities to heal there must be leadership from within.But as a white woman how do i help to establish that??
My prayers go out to all those who are suffering.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Teera Palmer
June 30th, 2007

Let us not forget!!!!!!
Remember the so called policy and practice of 'Protecting Aboriginal Children'???? It was stated at the time by those with the 'power-over'Aboriginal people, that it was 'for the best, for their own good'!!!!!
Little children forcibly removed from their families and their homelands to become enslaved by white bosses who often became their rapists and fathered many half-caste children who were consequently removed to avoid social embarrassment.
It is a well known fact that victims traumatised for life by sexual abuse pass it on to younger generations!!
White Australian Politics has EVERYTHING to answer for in regard to ensuring Aboriginal children are healthy and well - bringing in the troops is NOT OK - Not the solution!!!
The Howard government should get itself informed, Study Australian History, (what kind of history Curriculum was in place when John Howard was at school?) and acknowledge the history of ongoing NON-HUMANE INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT POLICY is the REAL problem.

The challenges faced by Aboriginal people and communities today are nothing more than the very real legacy of trying to survive under a government that 'PREACHES PROTECTION but PRACTICES GENOCIDE'!!
SHAME HOWARD SHAME!!!!!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Horst Walter
June 30th, 2007

There is a chilling article by Jennifer Martiniello circulating, which exposes the PM's "action" as what it really is - a heartless, calculated move to gain points in the up-coming election without really caring about the issues (and making a grab for Aboriginal land at the same time). One needs to ask the Howard government the question why the current "The Little Children are Sacred" report caused this knee-jerk reaction, whilst the previous five reports (1989, 1991, 1993, 1997 & 2002) on the very same matters, with the very same findings of terrible conditions in Indigenous communities, were ingnored?
An important point was made by a local MLA, by asking the PM why he did not ban alcohol across the whole of the NT? A good point - what if this (including forced medical examinations of our children) was done to us (the average aussie)? What every Australian should think about is what this "martial law-type" action by the Howard government really means for democracy and our freedom?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Of The Above None
June 30th, 2007

“The purpose of this is not to violate people's land rights. The purpose of this is to get control of these townships and if there is any disturbance of title then just compensation will be paid.” John Howard, 29/6/07

Here we go again folks. In his frantic search for an election-winning ‘rabbit out of a hat’ the PM and his sidekick, Mal Brough, have again elected to play the race card, choosing to suddenly discover the plight of indigenous children in the NT.

After all, it worked before with the Tampa and Children Overboard distortions of the truth.

In each case the fundamentals are the same. Each is based on white Australia’s lack of understanding that, whilst other peoples may have a different culture, they are fundamentally human too and so share most, if not all, the basic human urges- a quest for happiness, a love of partners and children, a desire for a better future etc.

Common sense would tell us that no race is intrinsically evil but this is the pre-election premise the PM would like us to assume every three years.

In the case of the 433 asylum seekers on the Tampa, John Howard asked us to believe that they were merely economic refugees/illegal immigrants, seeking a more lucrative future in OUR Australia. Over time most were accepted as genuine refugees, either by Australia or other countries, but not before an election was won on their backs and the expenditure of a billion dollars of your money. That’s a couple of hospitals or dozens of schools.

‘Children Overboard’ asked us to suspend all logic and believe that a group of people from a particular ethnic group would willingly risk their children’s lives by throwing them into the sea. Of course the truth turned out to be that their ship was sinking and, luckily, our Navy was there to rescue them.

In ‘Operation NT’, the PM is again asking us to believe the incredible; that Aboriginal people, men in particular, are all drunken paedophiles who have the NT’s children living in a state of fear.

It is true that many individual Aboriginal people and communities in the NT could be described as dysfunctional based on their anti-social behaviours, addiction to drink, petrol sniffing other drugs or just the depression brought about by the seeming hopelessness of their day to day existence.

But this is not a new phenomenon. I’m 57 and it has been the case for as long as I can remember. The PM is the second longest serving Member of the Federal Parliament; 33 years. I don’t recall him making a significant statement about Aboriginal welfare in all that time until now.

At least in this case some good will probably be done, although I doubt its Blitzkrieg approach will be very cost effective. Unfortunately, the downside in this case is likely to be far more severe than the couple of years on Nauru to which we subjected the Tampa people. It would seem that Howard and Brough have their eyes on the annexation of Aboriginal Lands as a longer-term objective.

Once considered worthless desert, these Lands are now either laden with minerals; particularly the PM’s mineral of the moment, uranium, or ideal sites for the dumping of the world’s nuclear waste. The Adelaide- Darwin railway was built for the transport of these two materials by a subsidiary of Halliburton, Dick Cheney’s company. Halliburton is heavily involved in the nuclear industry.

The only question left to ponder is what will be the Liberal’s election slogan and catchcry. How about, “Caring for all Australians” and “We will decide who gets Centrelink benefits and the circumstances in which it’s doled out”.

Whatever they are, you can bet they will have racial connotations and be sold to us with lots of pics of drunken Aboriginal men and the PM clutching a particularly photogenic Aboriginal child.

" Me thinks White Man speak with forked tongue"- Traditional

from http://noneoftheabove.com.au/

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Estelle Tudor
June 30th, 2007

This is the most important issue in the coming election for me. Its not only the N.T. and Torres Straight Islanders who are affected by these decisions. l know personally Indigenous folk who live in Taree on the mission and they are terrified as to what will happen. How dare politions hold back money/issue food stamps. These people are damaged because of Government blunders in the past- Let us not repeat our mistakes. The paternalistic approach is so long gone. TALK TO THEM-ASK THEM WHAT THEY WANT, FOR THEMSELVES AND THEIR CHILDREN......PLEASE PROTECT THEIR LAND.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jacqueline O'Donnell
June 30th, 2007

Getting the government to listen is near on impossible these days, especially once they've started the enginesof the bulldozer and have it heading down hill at high speed towards an innocent indigenous community.

I believe though that money always talks and this government is entirely in the hip pocket of big corporations - thus I suggest that anyone who doesn't agree with these actions stop buying alcohol and pornography themselves for the term of Howards action. Let him explain to the grog companies why their business just dropped of dramatically!!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Margaret Waddington
July 1st, 2007

Whilst acknowledging something must be done, it should have been done 10, 20 30 years ago or more. The Howard government should have consulted with the Aboriginal communities and they must work from the bottom up, housing, running water, health services, education facilities, etc, just not go in boots and all!
In the past 11 years Howard has steadily dismantled the Native Title agreement and the Reconciliation process. This is nothing but a land grab. Howard has found his 'onshore Tampa'.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Ben Ewald
July 1st, 2007

When did sending the troops in ever solve a sex abouse problem? Child abuse is a failure of parenting. Good parenting must be impossible in the chaos that is most Aboriginal communities.
I think the fundamental problem is that there is no economic base to most communities. Having no job (and gathering bush tucker where it is still available counts as a job) leaves most men at a loose end, without responsibilities, no productive role, and I think contributes to self destructive patterns. Women do better, with family responsibilites. Sit down money might stop people starving, but it destroys their self esteem. At least in the cattle days men had prowess with horses and country, and in the old days they had all the fine skills for living off the country. Now a young man in a remote community can play footy, fix his car, and go drinking.
I think that if a community has no prospects of real jobs it should be downgraded to a holiday destination where people go back to their land for weekends.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

lionel hurst
July 1st, 2007

Blaming Howard for the aboriginal problem ignores the equal neglect of the Hawke/Keating and prior,Whitlam, governments.Only Malcolm Fraser showed real concern for Aborigines.As the husband of a member of the stolen generation (my wife was taken by Police at gunpoint at age 4 in Dubbo NSW along with her four siblings who were then separated and placed in Christian bible bashing familes, with the accent on bashing) Howard's actions are welcome and admirable.I have spent time consulting with elders in three states and the NT who all wanted a ban on alcohol.City folk may live in a sick society but they do not understand what it is like to live in a sick community with virtually no facilities.The same ignorance besets most white politicians of all parties - their interests are more personal. However, no matter the incentive, Howard has at least done something positive.The boys in the army will be loved by the both the kids and the adults they will assist in rebuilding.Much better here than overseas, I'm sure you'll agree.
The major child abuse comes from failure to provide proper food and physical attack usually caused by excess alcohol fuelling depression.Sexual matters are a different and much more complex issue often resulting from a clash between tribal rules and white laws. White people might be amazed to discover that both of these are designed to protect young girls, especially, from sexual excesses.The wide availability of porn,even in the bush, has created new and worse sex problems that did not exist or were banned in traditional aboriginal society.
At last it has been recognised that Australia has it own serious social problems and the Government has taken Step One. With encouragement from the public the government will have the incentive to carry on and make a huge difference by improving the quality of life of both aboriginal chidlren and adults.Major criticism will give the politicians a reason to shelve the project.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Diane Floyd
July 2nd, 2007

Different time. Same place. Different government. Same idea. I'm a white Aussie & the idea towards our indigenous people appals me. LEAVE THEM ALONE!! Look at both skin colours and realise that it doesn't matter what level of society you are from, or the color of your skin, there are issues that people dom't know about. The poorer you are, the more the blame gets laid! Wake Up pollies. Help the real people.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.


Peter Graham
July 2nd, 2007

The plight of Aborigines is applalling, but has been known to Australians for many years. We have failed to do anything to alleviate it and,under the rule of John Howard, have done much to exacerbate it. Now, as his latest election stunt, Howard has declared a "National Emergency" aimed at,purportedly, saving children from abuse. If true, this would be an admirable aim. However, we have learned only too well that Howard never does anything unless he sees a political advantage or a chance for self aggrandizement. His word has been proven, ad nauseum, to be worth nothing. He has told so many untruths that we cannot believe him at all. This stunt probably masks a devious grab for Aboriginal land to hand over to uranium and other miners and to build his storage dump for the world's used nuclear fuel. This is a man who will say,and do, anything to hang onto power and to support his overweening ego. We have the chance later this year to vote him and his henchmen out. Should we be successful, we must keep on the back of Kevin Rudd and his party to clean up the mess Howard has made, but to do so in an honest and open way. The first thing we must require of him is to consult with the Aboriginal peoples to make a decent plan to right the many wrongs perpetrated on them and implement it, with their participation. Such negotiations and participation must be made with their freely elected representatives, not imposed pro government party appointees.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Kerry Ford
July 2nd, 2007

The attempt to stop sexual abuse with a military takeover is illogical and horrifying. How exactly is the army going to stop sexual abuse? The attempt to win votes by appearing to be 'doing something' is dirty and deceitful. Services have been underfunded for the last 10 years. The attempt to get at land is obscene and wrong. It is serving mining interests at the expense of communities who have lost so much already.

I am ashamed, I am angry and I am not going to be silent.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Melodie Murphy
July 2nd, 2007

I would appreciate anyone passing this letter around if they know anyone who might be able to do something.

Blissings*
Melodie

From the report: “Little Children are Sacred”

- An increased understanding and accommodation of an Aboriginal cultural perspective is required in order to effectively evaluate service provision in Aboriginal communities.-


Dear Sirs,

I am writing in the hope that someone will stop for just a moment and listen to reason. The Australian Government is using the report titled “Little Children are Sacred” to justify the abuse of human rights in our country.

The Australian Government has too long ignored the plight of our Indigenous peoples and now in an election year is using fear and racial attitudes to further their own ends by sending police and troops into Indigenous communities in the top end of Australia.

I am a white woman currently living in Melbourne after spending the last 15 years in the Northern Territory and most recently Katherine. I have a deep love for the Indigenous peoples of the NT and I speak as an ordinary Australian who is horrified by the abuse of power and theft of basic human rights and proposed theft of traditional lands from these people.

The report “Little Children are Sacred” is very well researched and I believe is quite accurate in its assessment and recommendations but these recommendations are not being addressed by the Australian Government although the Australian Prime Minister Mr John Howard has insisted his current actions are sparked by the report.

Not once does the report suggest sending in troops without community consultation, seizing control of Aboriginal lands or removing Aboriginal peoples fundamental human rights will be effective in dealing with the issues facing Indigenous communities.

The Australian Government is using this report as an excuse to ignore our constitution and introduce martial law. They are also using this as an excuse to remove the current “Permit system” that exists, giving Indigenous peoples control of their lands. This is nothing more than a land grab and has nothing to do with protecting abused children.

Mr John Howard has been quoted as saying: “ What is more important, constitutional niceties or protecting a child?” an emotive statement that is both misleading and indicative of his lack of respect for his elected position and the Australian Constitution and the Aboriginal peoples right to protection under that same constitution.

The report very clearly defines the issues surrounding Child Sexual Abuse in Indigenous Communities and debunks many of the myths perpetuated by the media.

The report very clearly calls for MORE COMMUNITY CONSULTATION WITH ABORIGINAL PEOPLES. – No community consultation has been undertaken by the Australian Government before sending in troops and federal police.

The report very clearly calls for MORE TRAINED FAMILYAND COMMUNITY WORKERS AND FUNDING FOR THE SAME. No commitment has been made by the Australian Government to provide these staff or more funding.

The report very clearly calls for MORE EDUCATION FOR YOUTH IN INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES. No commitment has been made by the Australian government to provide the funding and facilitation for such education.

The report very clearly calls for MORE SUPPORT FOR TRADITIONAL VALUES AND TEACHINGS IN INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES. No commitment has been made to support Indigenous peoples in teaching these values to their youth.

The report also very clearly points out that “little will be achieved by short-term measures aimed at responding after abuse has occurred (crisis intervention).”

The report states: “The Inquiry found, from interviews, submissions and
community consultations, that even if people were aware of sexual abuse and how to report it, they were reluctant to do so.”

Sending in the troops will not alleviate this problem.

The report makes it very clear that the kind of invasion action currently being undertaken by the Australian Government will be ineffective and possibly damaging to the Indigenous Communities it purports to be protecting.

The Government has been aware of this abuse for a number of years and has done nothing. This is an election year, so NOW they do something…

The report points out that in many cases where the sexual abuse was obvious, the local people had notified the Police or the local health centre. Sadly in many cases the offender was not charged or received such an insignificant sentence as to discourage further reporting.

The report suggested the reasons for not reporting abuse also included: “Fear and distrust of the Police, the criminal justice system and other government agencies; shame and embarrassment; language and communication barriers; lack of knowledge about legal rights and services available, and lack of appropriate services for Aboriginal victims.”

The report makes the point that: “In developing solutions aimed at child sexual abuse, it is important to define the nature of the problem being dealt with. Each circumstance may require a different solution.”

The Inquiry concludes that there needs to be mass education aimed at creating a “cultural shift” so that the human rights of all people are understood and respected. There also needs to be dialogue and support provided to Aboriginal communities so that they can modify practices
and find alternative ways to deal with the ramifications of the changes to their traditional structures.

“Concern was expressed that in some communities there is ambivalence about reporting or dealing with the issue of child sexual abuse. This ambivalence results from many interacting factors.

One can be a view that even if a report is made nothing changes or the change is a negative one, such as the child being removed, the perpetrator remaining in the community and perhaps not receiving any legal punishment, while the community is shamed and disrupted. While a community can express public concern about incidents of sexual abuse, the reality is that this often does not translate into action at an individual or family level.”

The Australian Government is now making plans to compulsorily submit all children on Indigenous communities to health checks for sexual abuse. Regardless of parental concerns, community concerns or the damage that such invasive investigations might cause the child.

I do realise that making the above points and statements flies in the face of current community support for Mr Howard’s actions but I suspect that attitude might stem from ignorance of the actual content of the report he is claiming to base his response on.

Many people will not bother to read 320 pages of information on an issue that does not directly affect them.

The problem of Child Sexual Abuse is real, children suffering is real, something must be done, but to abuse the power given to an elected government, to rob individuals of their rights under constitutional law and to target one group over any other is criminal.

In Australia 1 in 5 females and 1 in 10 males has been sexually abused. Is the government going to introduce compulsory medical checks for all Australian children?

To most city dwelling, non aboriginal people, this issue is frightening and the Australian Government is using that fear to justify its actions and declare a war on Indigenous communities.

Historically any government does well when there is a war on and the Australian Government is creating a warlike atmosphere complete with troops in order to bolster their chances of success at the polls.

The co- Author of the report “Little Children are Sacred” has recently spoken up to criticize the Government for not acting on the recommendations in the report.

I don’t know what anyone can do to stop this abuse, or to make the government implement the recommendations of the report, but I do know I have to say something. Maybe someone who can do something will actually listen.

Sincerely
Melodie Murphy
Victoria
info@kissmyweb.com
PH: 0406 170084

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Elizabeth Dale
July 2nd, 2007

11 years of inaction. 11 years of turning a blind eye. 11 years of ignoring the plight of our indigenous people. 11 years of being unable to say 'sorry'. Too little, too late. The Howard Government has never seen the issues surrounding our aboriginal community as an election winning issue. His current actions are purely political. They are band-aid solutions that ignore the real causes of the problem. Australians are sick and tired of your manipulation and lies, lies, lies. OUT WITH HOWARD AND HIS GOVERNMENT!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jane Brownrigg
July 2nd, 2007

Another set of lies purporting to indicate Howard cares about children more than their parents do. Last Election year - 'children overboard...' This election year - 'protect indigenous kids...'
More like make it easy for your mates in mining to exploit the region while being subsidised by australian taxpayers.
Shameful 'smoke and mirrors' - communities experience these problems as a result of the Howard Governments years of neglect.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Wes Fabb
July 2nd, 2007

There has been a agreeably positive response to John Howard’s initiative to address the problem of sexual abuse of indigenous children, but it should not surprise anyone that many observers are cynical about his motives. He has only himself to blame for this; commentators who indignantly condemn such cynicism should be well aware of its origin. Today’s Galaxy poll indicates that 58% believe John Howard is addressing problems in Aboriginal communities because of the upcoming federal election, including 29% of Coalition voters. Only 25% believe he really cares about Aboriginal children.

Now that this chronic problem is being addressed at last, the greatest fear is that it will fail, to the detriment of the affected children and families. There is so much more to be done than policing, alcohol prohibition and health checks – rehabilitation of alcoholics and petrol sniffers, housing, education, skills training, employment opportunities, recreational facilities, and so on.

Disturbingly, the Government’s approach to date seems to be hurriedly put together with little consultation, insufficiently cognizant of many of the recommendations of the Wild-Anderson Report and therefore lacking the comprehensiveness needed for success, and insufficiently mindful of the mammoth logistic challenge the initiative presents. Unexpected bits are being added in, to the concern of Aboriginal people and their advocates, but as Tony Abbott expediently put it, it’s a ‘work in progress’.

All who wish for success will be looking for a more comprehensive long-term line of attack, greater collaborative with all who have a contribution to make to resolving this appalling problem, and abandonment of the political ‘blame game’ between the Federal and State and Territory governments, that sadly is already gaining momentum.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Bob Burke
July 2nd, 2007

Sure we're all cynical of anything Howard does, and sure his response is flawed in both timing and content, but can we all get past these aspects and agree that something must be done to help indigenous children? And if so, let's hear some constructive ideas on what that "something" should be.
Since Howard's solution only applies in NT, we have the opportunity here in SA to do it properly, and maybe in the process develop a national model. Just for starters, how about a focussed consultation period of say not more than 3 months, during which experienced counsellors and mediators sit down with groups of elders and women to agree on the best strategies, and then follow that with urgent implementation of the agreed highest priority strategies, and ensure objectivity by measuring both the effectiveness and the outcomes.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

James Wafer
July 2nd, 2007

Here is a cross-posted blog on the issue. Well worth a read.

http://blogs.usyd.edu.au/elac/2007/06/the_devils_in_the_detail_1.html

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.


Denise Thompson
July 2nd, 2007

Your comment
Can GetUp please tell me what action, if any, it intends to take over the Government's land grab in the Northern Territory? It is clear that the majority of messages on this site express abhorrence for the action.
Can GetUp please find out why the Government deems it necessary to force Aboriginals from 60 communities in the NT to lease their lands to the government for 5 years? How will this improve the situation for the children?
John Howard has stated that if not all the communities are handed back then compensation will be made. Does this mean that Aboriginals wanting their land back will have no say but will be financially compensated, and where are they expected to go in the event that a mining lease is issued or a nuclear waste dump developed? This is another dispossession inflicted on a population reeling from past dispossessions.
Scrapping the Permit System is another appalling intention, despite strong opposition from the NT Government who know of its obvious benefits.
I believe those GetUp members concerned about this issue should concentrate only on the land grab issue and not allow it to be lost in the very emotive issue of child sexual abuse. Let us protect the children AND their inheritance.
Denise Thompson

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Brian Mitchell
July 2nd, 2007

It seems that Mr Howard's attitude is that his way is the only way - leadership only of likeminded supporters.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Maggie Galley
July 2nd, 2007

I do not agree with this approach of the government. I agree with sentiments that say that empowerment of the aboriginal people to solve their own problems in their own way is the direction that should be taken. What we can do to assist is to ensure they have the resources that they need. This government has eroded their empowerment not complimented it because the solution is the construct of white males who only believe in white man's ways!!!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Catherine Vanderham
July 3rd, 2007

Your comment What on earth is John Howard thinking, did he learn nothing from the past mistakes of the Government of this country with its paternalistic actions (the stolen generation).

The appaling child abuse in ALL COMMUNITIES indigenous or non indigenous needs to be stopped, but sending in the Army does NOT seem to be the right way to go about it. Education, improved health care and housing would be a start, with rehab programs for the abusers of substances and alcohol. Ofcourse all of this requires funding, and that funding should be provided by the Fedral Government.

Invasive examinations of children should not be carried out unless there is a medical need, and then it sould be carried out in a curturally sensitive manner and preferabley by and person of similar background to the child. eg Indigenous child should be examined by an indigenous medical worker and a non indigenous child by a non indigenous medical worker.

The indigenous people should be consulted as to what would be the best way to deal with child abuse in their communities, and non indigenous people likewise in their communities.

Although there are some high profile "White Australians" who are "racist", NOT ALL "White Australians" are.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.


Tony Troughton-Smith
July 3rd, 2007

It is widely accepted that abusive behaviour, in any community or country, is usually learned - perpetrators have often themselves been victims of abuse and violence in their own childhoods. Australian Aborigines, I am informed, have no history of abuse within their traditional societies, but respected both women and children. The same regrettably cannot be said of the Europeans who have effectively obliterated Aboriginal cultures over the past two centuries: we have a documented history of violence, force, and sexual assault, both within our own culture and against First Peoples, both here and in other colonised countries.
None of this in any way excuses such behaviour, by anyone, but it does highlight the complexity of the problem, and suggests that attempts at 'quick fixes' should be seen as ignorant, dangerous and culpable, especially when they involve further violence, or threats of it by the use of authority figures such as Police and Troops, the threat of removal of children, and further loss of autonomy by removal of the pass system, land rights, etc.. This is not only blaming the victims, but punishing them further. The WA government demonstrated the same despicable approach by using a reported rape to close down the entire model Swan Valley Nyungah's residential community, and disperse its occupants - mainly women and children - throughout metropolitan Perth, breaking up families in the process.
In fact the figures show that incidence of substantiated child abuse in the Northern Territory among indigenous Australians is significantly less prevalent than it is in many other states (see http://www.workingpapers.com.au/ for the data on this), yet the Howard government is targeting and persecuting them. It is difficult to believe this is not a political move, especially after years of reductions in assistance and funding for health, housing, education, police resources etc..
There are reports of (non-aboriginal) mine workers paying for sex with under-aged aboriginal children - either with money, alcohol, drugs or petrol for sniffing. Will the prime minister's agents target this, and who will pay the price?
What we are seeing - and it is at least good that it is being brought to the country's notice - is the result of generations of abuse and neglect of Australian Aborigines, their cultures and communities. Our short history on this continent merits a "black arm-band". The PM's own denial of this only adds to our burden of shame and responsibility, and troops are not the answer.
For Mr Howard to establish his bona fides he must instead implement all the recommendations of the Wild/Anderson "Little Children are Sacred" report that he has so far only used as an excuse for his "emergency" actions. All 97 recommendations in the report are included in the article by Peter Botsman at http://www.workingpapers.com.au/publishedpapers/2502.html

Tony
Perth Hills

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Len Ryan
July 4th, 2007

Paternalistic solutions have been tried in the past and have failed with horrible consequences. One community I was involved with in the seventies lost 50 % of their population to grog and it problems under a system very similar to what is being proposed.

The Howard does not seem to be able to learn anything from history. The mistakes of the past will be made again & again. What the communities need is support and funding.

The Howard government has let the communities decline to the point of collapse and then has to take over. The real agenda here is land.

As an Australian I am ashamed that we are still allowing this treatment to be forced on the original owners of our land.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Geoffrey Richardson
July 4th, 2007

Yo The reluctance of professionals, doctors, nurses, schoolteachers and police, to commit to long periods out in the deep country areas is well known, and must have been known to the Prime Minister and his Minister before they sketched out their plan to completely make over the lives of the native peoples in the Northern Territory. As must the fact that it would not be a short term campaign if it was to be a success. Particularly as there is no European style accommodation in these reservation areas, and living there would be under canvas for the foreseeable future.
This leads inevitably to a conclusion that there may be another motive in moving in such a heavy handed fashion into the area after having successfully ignored the problem which has been known, documented and ignored for generations. It was certainly known when my father was a Home Missionary of the Presbyterian Church in Broome in 1917-1918.
What other motive might there be? Perhaps a clue might lie in the statement that the Federal Government is prepared to take over Aboriginal lands in order to effect their changes.
Not long ago the Prime Minister floated the idea that Aboriginal land might be acquired for use as a site for spent nuclear waste. This was roundly rejected by the owners, particularly as they have already been subjected once to such treatment at Maralinga, and it has been reported that carcimomas are unusually present in the tribal area around Jabiluka after careless spills by the company operating there. This people have resisted the expansion of the mine quite successfully up to date.
But if the Federal Government acts to take over native lands on the basis of health and welfare operations, then what is there to prevent the Government from using resumed native land to found a world dumping ground for nuclear waste, and permit the expansion of existing and new uranium mines?
Is this the Children Overboard move of this term’s election?
ur comment

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Erin O'Donnell
July 4th, 2007

Cross-posted from an email I received from Andrew Biven, who is currently working at Manigrida in Arnhem Land - prior to this he was the Director of the South Australian Network of Drug and Alcohol Services and was well known through this role.

His comments deserve our attention - the heavy-handed approach of the government is horrific. We cannot stand idly by and let further shame be brought to innocent people on our watch. We cannot let children be further traumatised. One Stolen Generation is enough.

Please keep reading and please contact your local members to urge them to change their approach.

"My apologies for contacting you out of the blue - however numbers of us Balanders (whitefellas) up here have decided we needed to contact as many people as possible and begin to get the message out that what Howard and Brough are proposing is not the way to go.
Picture sixty Aboriginal communities in the NT floundering in the sea of national indifference for decades. Suddenly, in a time of political crisis for the ruling party, an emergency that has been slowly emerging during those decades is grasped and radical, ill conceived (and some would say entirely cynical) measures are imposed with expressions of general self righteous indignation and opprobrium at the behaviour of those communities in flinging themselves and particularly their children, into the waters of dysfunction.
Shame and blame are two powerful weapons of the dominant culture and can only spell a further deterioration in the conditions for Aboriginal communities. I urge you to contact your local politician and in all other ways help to bring to light the ill-conceived nature of the responses Howard and Brough announced last week.
Few would question some of the desired outcomes protection of children, greater participation, motivation and self-esteem. However, what has been proposed is short-term, imposed, misdirected and unsupported by decades of evidence of what works and particularly, what patently doesn¹t work.
To make impositions on functional as well as supposedly dysfunctional communities make even less sense.
It is, of course, difficult for anyone to speak out as it is so easy to brand them as indifferent to the plight of abused children. It is also so easy and convenient to trample the rights of whole communities in the scramble to remedy a situation that has been known and ignored for at least the last ten years and has it origins 200 years ago.
Let¹s leave aside our cynicism about why this issue suddenly needs such focus and closely examine what is being proposed to see if it can be done and if it will work. First though, a word about situations where perceptions of child sex abuse may in fact be children exposed to sexual situations leading to assumptions that the kids are directly the targets.
This is not to deny that there are not situations of direct physical sexual abuse. However, the more common situation may be less shocking.
The average household occupancy in this community is 17 people. Houses are small, miniscule by McMansion standards. People mostly sleep on foam mattresses scattered around the floors with two, three or more to a mattress. People don't like to be alone anywhere - you don't go out without a couple of family or friends - too scary. Privacy is rare and children from their first years no doubt witness sex occurring in all its manifestations much as they do in all societies where there is communal sleeping. Therefore, the knowledge even very young children have about sexual acts is very much greater than in our single person per room culture.
In those circumstances it would be understandable that some young children might play act the scenes they witness most nights. Its also pretty lively in these homes at night with lots of people coming and going, tvs on, card games, lots of conversations and laughing. Kids don¹t get a lot of sleep sometimes. And it is pretty exciting with half a dozen brothers, sisters, cousins in your bed. If some of those brothers, sisters, cousins happen to be at the age of sexual awakening naturally there will be lots of Œinvestigation¹ and that may involve very young children. Not a good thing, but when you see how and why it arises you have an insight into how to begin to address it. It¹s hard to see how medical examinations will help, easy to see how improving housing will. Certainly pornography doesn¹t help yet we have been slow to do anything about it anywhere. Parent education and support is a big one too the collapse of communities has eroded parent¹s knowledge and authority. Dysfunction is passed from one generation to the next. Alcohol and other drugs are in the mix and need addressing see below.
So what are the proposals for this emergency of the last decades? Will they work? And if not these proposals, what?
1. Compulsory health checks for all aboriginal children under 16. Doctors and health clinics currently struggle to cope with the burden of chronic disease and primary health care needs. There are severe shortages of all medical staff in remote areas, just as there are in most rural towns across Australia. To draft in the legion of extra staff to conduct these tests requires simple things like accommodation there are no hotels, motels, no available rooms so it will require a building program or a tent city a building program is hardly within the emergency response time proposed. If its hard enough to attract medical staff with current incentives, the prospect of tent city is an unusual strategy to incline minds towards volunteering. So send in the army for maximum publicity, minimum impact.
Medical examination is one tool in identifying sexual abuse, patient and sensitive inquiry a more likely successful one. In many NT communities English is the second, sometimes third or fourth language spoken and not well understood by most people. Effective inquiry requires that the investigator not only speaks the primary language of those being investigated, but speaks it so well and understands the cultural environment so well as to be able to interpret the nuances of oral communication. And what do we do on discovering evidence of possible sexual abuse/activity?
Remove them from these situations? our foster care system for indigenous children is already at the point of collapse due to lack of places. There is no foster care in remote communities another branch of the family steps in but there are 17 or more in their household too! Do we reopen Colebrook and similar institutions of the past? Probably not a good idea.
Intervene in the family situation? Ah counsellingÃ… . well yes Mal and John, do we have legions of culturally attuned social workers able to speak an Aboriginal language (at least one of the 13 dialects in this community) and ready to fly in to remote communities with sufficient on-the-ground knowledge to be able to understand the dynamics of the family and to know the best option for the child, motivated to stay in a tent city, and self-assured enough to feel protected from the anger of parents and relatives?
2. Linking welfare payments to school attendance in the long run not such a bad idea but to simply impose it in a short time frame ignores the inability of the education system to cope and the reality of many children who are not attending for very understandable reasons if you don¹t get much sleep the night before because of all the people partying in your room, if you are too shamed to go to school because you don¹t have adequate clothes compared to those who are at school (because you share all your clothes with everyone else your size in the house), if you¹re hungry in the morning and there¹s nothing in the house Œcause all those people eat anything as soon as its bought and anyway you can¹t store it if the fridge isn¹t
working and no-one knows how to fix it. And your parents don¹t understand the importance of school they never went either.
Who will act as the truancy officers? The teachers great for building trust and rapport and great for personal safety too. The police they are going to be both very busy and very unpopular and at the moment community police spend a lot of their time cultivating trust and cooperation as they know that force will never control a community. Well then, let¹s employ truancy officers that would be a popular job likely to attract very suitable characters into a traumatized community wouldn¹t it? Don¹t fantasize that you could get community people to do this they would be even more at risk of reprisal than would an outsider.
If all school-aged kids did all turn up on the same day here, there are nowhere near enough classrooms, chairs, teachers and education resources.
The school needs to double in size. Right John, lets fly in a whole bunch of teachers but where do they stay? Tent city? And where do they teach?
And where are they now because the education system has been trying to recruit them for the last 10 years. Lets getting cracking with the building program, the training of teachers who want to work out here, the support for them doing what must be the most challenging teaching job in Australia.
We might get somewhere in about 5 years minimum.
Education is central to improving Aboriginal communities. At present many community organizations struggle to find Aboriginal people with the skills and commitment to work in them. Sadly, after 50 years of schooling, training and apprenticeshipping there are very few young local Aboriginal people working in full wage paying jobs most are in work-for-the-dole CDEP positions and earning a Œtop up¹ for extra hours worked beyond the required 20 per week. CDEP promotes underemployment but it successfully disguises the high levels of unemployment in communities so Mal and John can quote a figure of only 13% unemployment for Indigenous Australians those of you who have visited remote communities - do you believe that? There are some older Aboriginal people who trained in the seventies and eighties who do have the skills and are the Health Workers, Rangers, Works Supervisors of the community. However, they are retiring, getting sick, dying from the burdens of responsibility for their communities. There are so few younger ones coming through to replace them. In this community there are training positions leading to full paid work in most organizations health, council, services, retail, industry and all struggle to get anyone local to apply, let alone complete. Balanders (whitefellas) do most of the work. Again, the reasons are complex and require long-term solutions. Attending, prospering in and completing schooling is the key. Blaming is no solution and only serves to undermine any remaining self-confidence a community may have. Force simply will not work.
3. Banning pornography not too many arguments there, but hey, that opens up a good black market doesn¹t it and with the roads open due to abolition of the permits system, there looks to be a few bucks to be made there. And let¹s not believe trafficking in pornography will be done only by Aboriginal people - there are plenty of very dodgy whitefellas in the Outback and Top End frontierland seems to attract them.
4. Banning alcohol on the surface it looks promising but our experience over the last half century of dry communities is that:-
**People leave to drink in towns and cities, sometimes leaving children to be looked after by already overburdened extended family. Those who leave are often young to middle-age and who should be the backbone of the community.
**Black markets for alcohol, gunga, kava, petrol and other drugs quickly develop.
**Alcohol remains that elusive substance to be consumed in as great a quantity and at as great a speed as possible because it is expensive, precious, illicit and it does quell the physical, emotional and spiritual hunger, if only briefly.
Rather, we need programs that encourage responsible consumption of alcohol, where there are rewards for sensible drinking and sanctions for irresponsible drinking. We should also encourage (not impose) non-drinking as a best option (wouldn¹t that be a challenge to the alcohol industry in mainstream society). This community has one of the best models I have seen it would of course be a lot better if it had resources to back it up. Here, you can apply for a permit to drink up to two cartons of beer a fortnight, or 8 bottles of wine (for us balanders). You start off on light beer and if you go OK on that you can apply for full-strength after three months. If you bugger up any violence, breech of other rules (such as sharing with people on a ban), neglect, missing work too much, etc., you lose your permit for three months and have to reapply a committee of balanders and locals make the decisions. It¹s not perfect but is a realistic attempt to encourage responsible patterns of drinking. It¹s a long-term process at the moment the role modelling around alcohol consumption is very negative how can kids grow up with a different relationship to alcohol when all they see is binge drinking or their parents leaving them to go and drink in town.
Alcohol is not going away anytime soon so somehow and sometime Aboriginal people are going to have to learn other ways to deal with it.
5. Taking control of Aboriginal land and abolishing the permit system ahah, are we finally getting to the real agenda? Many Aboriginal people believe so and the evidence for them rests with the decision to abolish the permit system. It makes no sense to them to open communities up to a whole lot more people wandering in and out. Trafficking in alcohol, drugs, pornography and sex suddenly becomes a whole lot easier. It certainly makes no sense if indeed it is a ³crisis² normally a time when restrictions are imposed, not lifted. Look at our response to terrorism.
In their announcements Johnny and Mal talked vaguely of removing some of the rights of Traditional Owners, instituting different rent arrangements in remote communities (as distinct from outstations or homelands), moving towards individual land ownership. We all know that relationship to land is the defining difference between Indigenous and mainstream culture. There may be a case for changing some land arrangements in some places. However, there is little evidence available to encourage Aboriginal people to trust Johnny on this one. And there is ample evidence of the conservative agenda to deny the special rights and place of Aboriginal people inAustralia .
One would hope that they will treat each community individually as there is such a diversity of experience and relationship in the different parts of Australia some communities may lend themselves to conversion to individual landholdings, in others it could spell the destruction of all traditional relationships and cultural values. Communities in Arnhem Land are very different to Noel Pearson¹s home community on Cape York. Here language is alive, culture is practiced every day. The Queensland Government of the past had a conscious and largely successful policy of eradicating language and much culture heritage.
The latest calls to arms for volunteers send shivers through communities - the last thing needed are ill-informed, ill-prepared and ill-supported hordes of volunteers descending on these communities to peddle their own brands of concern, judgement and condescension. You can't say this situation has not been known about for years - genuine volunteers are or have been here already.
There are solutions you have no doubt picked some of them up in the course of reading this. There are many more suggested by others more knowledgeable than me. Solutions require patience and cooperation, are long-term, difficult, expensive and achievable. We need a national commitment beyond the electoral cycle.
Please note these thoughts of mine follow barely a month in residence here I don¹t profess to have all the answers, some of what I say may well be misinformed but I, at least, am prepared to stand corrected. If you are in a position to speak out about this situation or to inform others, please grasp it."

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

ella stanton
July 4th, 2007

Self determination is seen as little next to nothing by the Government's current actions. Taking away the power of Indigenous people to make their own decisions in this generation is utterly unforgivable. I don't believe positive change can come from the top down. I've said it before and i'll say it again, 'NOT HAPPY JOHN!'

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Deborah Albert
July 4th, 2007

The shame and guilt these accusations will cause so many for years to come is immeasurable. I am sickened to my very soul and can't believe what I am hearing, I am utterly ashamed of our government and us as a nation. The billions of dollars that went, and still goes, toward funding yet another 'Christian Power and Resources War' would have fixed so many of our own problems. What are we doing fighting an enemy who's absolute best is 'the twin towers', while we can, and do, totally destroy entire families, communities and whole country infrastructures, environments and people's souls, at home and overseas. From the time white man landed here we have raped, murdered and displaced the Aboriginees. There are records of White Paedophiles preying on Aboriginal children from our initial invasion of this country, we failed to protect them then, since then and now. Where do the politicians get off acting shocked that the Aboriginees behave as they do, they are just mimicking our own ways but are too poor to access resources and services or pay for cover-ups as we do. And what are the churches doing about their role in influencing these behaviours in Aborigines, are they going to kick in anything toward the cost? We did this to them and we must fund the solutions and do it now. Let the individual blame game end now, we are all victims of our history and circumstance and some need a stronger lifeline than others to move through and on from this because they copped a worse lot than most. Money will provide those lifelines. Poverty is one of the main predictors of all society's problems yet politicians won't lift a finger to even up the playing field for those that we impoverished. Tokenism is all that's on offer again it seems, how very horrible for us all. I see a land and resources grab, I see slave labour (or should I say traineeships?), I see the problem moving to bigger towns and cities (where there's equality in accessing alcohol and drugs) and I see a govt saving a fortune by not providing the appropriate resources and services where they are needed now. I see all this and I don't even need a crystal ball or a govt report. One last thing, so as not to discriminate, and to prove that the law applies to all levels of society, could Jonny also cut the wages (by 50%)of white and migrant child abusers, and ban them from accessing alcohol or drugs? Perhaps he could take their land and homes as well.Of course, to be fair, the identity and geography of the comminities they live in would need to be published along side photos of community members and their children.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

cathie archer
July 4th, 2007

Having nursed and lived on an Aboriginal Community for 11 years, I found the most successful tool to educate people on health concerns was relationship building or sitting down and yarning with the elders. It created trust and formed good networks within the community and links with mainstream organisations. Glossy government brochures and newsletters are false advertising of their accomplishments and flimsy in structure. NO army will create trust.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.


Kevin Rennie
July 5th, 2007

Time to sink Howard's crew

On tuesday I started yet another political blog, Labor View from Broome (http://laborview.blogspot.com/) about Australian politics and the desperate need for a change of government later this year.

I did not include any analysis of the current invasion of the Northern Territory because I was still too angry. In April this year I attended the Year 12 Graduation for 11 Maningrida Community Education Centre students who completed their Northern Territory Certificate of Education at their Arnhem Land school during 2006. It was the third year students have graduated and more than 500 members of the community attended. In addition three aboriginal staff members were awarded Certificate III in Indigenous Education by Batchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education. It was a good news story that the Federal government was either unaware of or chose to ignore.

Like all Australian communities Maningrida has the kind of problems we hear about everyday, yet it has been ignored by Howard and Brough and their Federal colleagues. They did not even comment on, much less visit, the community after Australia’s most severe cyclone, Cyclone Monica, in April last year. Both ministers Brough and Costello were in the NT in the following week and are condemned for their silence and lack of support.

As Ben Chubby reported five weeks afterwards in the Sydney Morning Herald (Remains of the day, June 3, 2006, ) http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/remains-of-the-day/2006/06/02/1148956547886.html

The Herald repeatedly contacted the office of the federal Indigenous Affairs Minister, Mal Brough, to discuss help for the area and ask if he intended to visit Maningrida, but Brough had made no comment by last night. A spokesman said the minister regularly visited indigenous communities.


We were still waiting for the visit in December. The last truth overboard was when Howard compared the current situation in Australia with Hurricane Katrina that required sending in the army. This man and his hypocritical, arrogant government must go now.

I have not felt so strongly about the direction of Australian politics since the Whitlam years. To borrow another political cliché, it is a time for us all to speak.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Valerie Ross-Wilson
July 5th, 2007

Your comment Abori ginalcommunities deserve the respect of being consulted at every step of the way. The heavy handed implementation of this policy will do more harm than good. It is saddening to see good people being tarnished; there doesn't seem to be objective reporting in the mainstream media. There are good communities and good individuals everywhere. I can't help but feel that this is John Howard being tricky and devisive.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.


Tony Troughton-Smith
July 6th, 2007

The New Internationalist online has a link to the Australian's For Native Title and Reconciliation (ANTaR) site where there is an open letter you can add your name to. The web address for the open letter is http://www.antar.org.au/content/view/441/1

The open letter says:
Open letter to The Hon. Mal Brough MP
Minister for Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs
House of Representatives
Parliament House
Canberra ACT 2600

Dear Minister Brough

The undersigned organisations write this joint and open letter in order to convey our views on action required to stop the abuse of children in Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory, and our concerns about aspects of the Australian Government’s response to this problem as outlined in your statement of 21 June 2007.

The safety and well-being of Indigenous children is paramount. We welcome your commitment to tackling violence and abuse in certain Indigenous communities. We are deeply concerned at the severity and widespread nature of the problems of child sexual abuse and community breakdown in Indigenous communities in the NT, catalogued in the Little Children are Sacred Report.

We wish to work collaboratively with Governments and the communities affected to ensure that children are protected. We would like to see greater investment in the services that support Indigenous families and communities, the active involvement of these communities in finding solutions to these problems and greater Federal Government engagement in delivering basic health, housing and education services to remote communities.

There is general agreement among the communities affected, Governments and service providers and in the wider Australian community that urgent action is required to address the abuse and neglect of children and to assist those affected by it.

We note that the services which most Australians take for granted are often not delivered to remote Indigenous communities, including adequately resourced schools, health services, child protection and family support services, as well as police who are trained to deal with domestic violence in the communities affected. We endorse the call in the Little Children are Sacred Report for the Australian and Territory Governments to work together urgently to fill these gaps in services.

There is also a need for a longer term plan to address the underlying causes of the problem, including community breakdown, joblessness, overcrowding and low levels of education.

Successfully tackling these problems requires sustainable solutions, which must be worked out with the communities, not prescribed from Canberra.

We are committed to working with the Government to ensure that in developing and introducing the proposed measures, support is provided to Indigenous communities’ efforts to resolve these problems. The proposals go well beyond an ‘emergency response’, and will have profound effects on people’s incomes, land ownership, and their ability to decide the kind of medical treatment they receive. Some of the measures will weaken communities and families by taking from them the ability to make basic decisions about their lives, thus removing responsibility instead of empowering them.

In their present form the proposals miss the mark and are unlikely to be effective. There is an over-reliance on top-down and punitive measures, and insufficient indication that additional resources will be mobilised where they are urgently needed; to improve housing, child protection and domestic violence supports, schools, health services, alcohol and drug rehab programs. These issues have been raised by many Indigenous leaders over many years.

We offer our support to Indigenous communities and the Government in:

* developing programs that will strengthen families and communities to empower them to confront the problems they face;
* consulting adequately with the communities and NT Government, and community service, health and education providers;
* developing a long term plan to address and resolve the causes of child abuse including joblessness, poor housing, education and commit the necessary resources to this.

Yours sincerely

Mick Dodson

Rt Hon Malcolm Fraser and Dr Lowitja O'Donoghue
Co-Chairs, Sorry Day Alliance

[plus a long list of other signatories way too long to include here.]

To add your name to the list go to http://www.antar.org.au/content/view/441/1

Tony
Perth Hills

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Alan Woodcock
July 6th, 2007

The very bottom line of Howard and co.'s move into the NT has NOTHING at all to do with Aboriginal Welfare at all--and has everything to do with the comming election.He knows there is a large body "Rednecks" in this country,he also know by moving in the way he has this will stir up that Radneck community.Cant you just hear them all saying as they swill their beer "Yair--little Johnny's the bloke to stir the buggers up".Be truthful,Howard isnt interested in Aboriginal welfare--he's just interested in power--how can anyone think things will change between now and the election ? Should he(Heavan forbid) win the next election it will all be dropped.The REAL answer is to drop Howard and Co like a hot brick at the election.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Ez
July 6th, 2007

I like the design and idea of your site, but it really worries me that after looking at it all, it simply seems to be a government bashing site like all the others. There is no for and against it all just seems to be against the Govt. at all costs. I was looking forward to seeing this site, and i must say i am disappointed at the lack of equality. Thank You

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

ezkii
July 6th, 2007

Just to point out, a lot of people are saying John Howard has had 11 years to solve this problem, I think a lot of you are forgetting that this should have been a State Problem not a Federal Problem, but the Labour state has done absolutely nothing and thus the situation has gotten completely out of control and Mr Howard has had to step in. So when saying it should have happened sooner, direct that comment to the state government not the federal government, at least they are doing something!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Karen Spokes
July 6th, 2007

Thank goodness!
I honestly thought no-one cared what was going on!
The paper the radio don't have a TV but thought no-one was
listening to this or caring. What a relief to see that people
do care and have similar thoughts to mine!
I'm horrified at the political in put into this situation like they care or are really interested which is obvious by the budget and the short fall in the funding for the aboriginal people.
Have we not raped, murdered and stolen there children enough!!!!!!! Are they going to be mistreated forever or until they live no more because we have broken there spirit by taking there land there children there dignity there respect!!!
Are they not already acting like white society enough by drinking, child abuse, domestic abuse these are all things we have handed on to them we have said dont live like savages live like us???!!!!
We stole this generation from there parents we took them to homes and we abused them now they have grown up with this knowledge. What a priceless gift of being anglo-saxon makes me proud NOT!
I am ashamed of my past in this country I am ashamed how and what we did in the name of power and greed. I am ashamed that today we are still letting government bodies do this to these people.
We could have learnt so much about this country and how it works the plant knowledge the water knowledge just so much priceless knowledge has been lost to bullies and we are still cowering to it! WHY!
I cannot listen to media because we just lie to each other we cheat ourselves out of a soceity that could stand for so much we could really learn something now but we won't.
I just don't understand the answers are so clear common sense could be used here but it won't. More people will be hurt yet again! WHY!
I just don't understand why it has to be this way!!!
We could all be equal there is just as much child abuse going on in white communities. There is just as much alcohol abuse going on. There is as much domestic abuse going on. We all know this!!!! Why don't we send in the army to Sydney, Melbourne or Adelaide oh thats right we cannot treat ourselves that way can we because we are different we are allowed to tolerate this behaviour?! WHY!!
Wake up Australians and lets treat each other with the respect and dignity we all deserve and our native Australians deserve our sincere apologies.....

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jenna Conway-Jones
July 7th, 2007

I am far from being a fan of the Howard government. I think his recent moves may have been politically motivated, but think what does it matter right now. Something needed to be done and it wasn't getting done. It is pointless to whine about why now and not years ago, that's the past and you can't change it. What can be changed is the future of thousands of children. He has now got the ball rolling, for now if people are feeling there rights have been abused I believe it is a case of too bad. That is something that can be looked at once, order has been restored in these remote communities. The Howard plan may be short sighted but it is better then having no vision at all. But that is also something that can be looked at once order is in place. No one is talking about having a permanent dictatorship set up in rural aboriginal communities. What they are saying is drastic measures need to be taken to get things started, or it would have been months or years of more back and forth between the federal government, aboriginal communities and the NT government. I am an avid supporter of aboriginal rights and do come from an indigenous background. I am thankful that I did not have to grow up in a community full of drug use, alcoholism, violence and fear. And I am, sure any child now saved that fate would agree.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Madeleine Bullock
July 7th, 2007

I cannot understand how the Prime Minister and his Cabinet members, as professed Christians and promoters of Human Rights, are still withholding the Dollars which will address the Health and educational needs of the indigenpus Australians. Especially when they have millions of dollars in the Budget to spend on Superannuation Funds, increasing the wealth of already wealthy members of society and continuing to promote a war in Iraq.. The present so called National Emergency is a pathetic attempt to blind and confuse the voters before the Election...we will not be fooled Mr Howard..no more lies please.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

alecia buchanan
July 7th, 2007

GetUp - please please please look more deeply into the issue of land takeover as a part of this 'emergency' response. While we here in the Centre are in no doubt of the intervention needed to combat the appalling situation so many kids are enduring, let us be vigilant in the knowledge that Howard has a history of attempting to erode people's entitlement to their inherited land. It is not necessary to wholistically withdraw people's right to their land in order to address the problem, and dammit its just not right. I can see so many positives coming out of this, but ............ I smell a rat!!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Dav
July 7th, 2007

I logged into Get Up this afternoon, because I had thought that Get Up had been too silent on the issues described precicely in this blog. I wanted to check this issue was being followed. I do not think Get Up has appropriately responded to the Fedral Governments response to date. I feel an additional campaign is required on top of the very worthy health campaign, that is currently running. This broader issue deserves more attention.

To ensure an enduring and effective solution to indigenous health, public support and interest needs to be maintained. This is precicely why Climate Change, has been so successfully embraced by individuals in Australia.

My bones are still shaking after seeing letters and associated editorial on 60 Minutes last weekend that conveyed the overwhelming public attitude towards the issue as "You can't help those who can't help themselves".

I know that my feelings on the issue are of 'genuine concern', but can downgrade to helplessness and to apathy if the issues are removed from the public agenda.

Quite simply, I think Get Up needs a campaign to lobby public concern. I feel that the myth that "these people can't help themselves" needs to be broken down in the public view. Criticism of the Fedral Governments "solution" will be far less productive, than widespread public interest debate and concern. This includes educating the public, on the success stories and the real issues.

Get Up needs to campaign popular media, and campaign the public. We need billboards, we need to give the media the stories, and we can't let the topic fall off the agenda as it has always done in the past.

We need to track what the Government is doing and keep the public eye on the good and the bad of their 'solution'. I don't even care if this helps the Howard election campaign.

Already my beloved Saturday Herald was relatively quiet on the issue today. Please lets not let this one slip away again.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jenni radke
July 7th, 2007

Having worked with many abused children (of all colors!) Howard's methods are simply cruel and brutal - and ignorant. BUT why are we not hearing comments against the Government's heavy-handedness from Rudd and the Labor Party?? Are they also SO ignorant? Do they read anything like the comments in these blogs and the excellent report in Courier Mail 5.7.07 by Jane Fynes-Clinton? Have they read the recommendations in the "Little Children are Sacred"report?? How can they not criticise the Government for devising their own 'solution'?

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Wayne Coles-Janess
July 7th, 2007

Have spent some time documenting the lives of the Bougainvillians who were subjected to about 10 years of Armed Conflict.

Around Alice Spring, we started a Program "The Lore" - you can see a trailer on http://facto.tv/ - We did want to give Aboriginals a Voice. The AFC did fund some development....

But Since the Iraq Documentary, the way is which information is made available and how is a bit scary. - The Iraq documentary was "declined in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, and Adelaide - but 60 international Film Festivals.

The opportunity to present honest and accurate information is paramount to understanding and then hopefully offer solutions?



Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

rod
July 8th, 2007

Howard should not have had to take responsibilty for the aboriginal problem. Housing , health, education are state resposibilities. Great Labour premiers around the country continue to pass the buck then criticise the Feds when they move. All the states are benefitting from the buoyant economy, have record budget surpluses (notwithstanding incresed public administration expenditure) yet have done nothing to help the aboriginal people.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

carmel murray
July 9th, 2007

The aboriginal issues are a smoke screen for the real agenda which is to secure aboriginal land for the procurement of mining leases. It is a blatantly cynical and callous act perpetrated against those most in need at a time when our country has the resources to make a real difference to these communities.
The only emergency that Howard is concerned about is the looming realisation that these communities are made of sterner stuff and wouldn't be starved out by lack of services, a new approach was urgently needed to rid the land of them and open the way for development.
Us white fellas have been pitching Aboriginals off their land since we arrived in this country and telling everyone it was for their own good becoase they couldn't take care of themselves. Same ol', same ol'.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

trevoor newman
July 9th, 2007

The blog quotes medical examinations as compulsory.
Unfortunately, they are not to be so.
Does anyone with experience of or familiarity with the camps and communities really believe that the women are free to bring the children to the teams for medicals?
The drunken violence that pervades many of these camps ( and any other abuse) will conceal any problems, to a large degree by threats of violence to any who present for protection.
Howard has the right idea (Never thought that I would be guilty of saying that!) but has been bluffed by do gooders and lawyers. If the compulsory examinations are illegal, change the law for the period of the intervention and do the right thing by the children.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

July 10th, 2007

I am trying to find a group or persons who may be organising a national day of action. Do you know of an organisation, or communities who may be proposing that we again 'walk the bridge' in solidarity to protest this skant attempt to aid Indigenous Australians? A national day of action in every capital city may help us to show that not all Australians support the military being set upon its own people.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jonas
July 10th, 2007

Economic management aside, recent revelations involving Dr. Nelson's oil slip up and careless comments on China's military capacities are just further examples of the government's total deficiency in all foreign policy matters.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21NY8wMemCg

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

David R Nunn
July 10th, 2007

Here we go again! An election around the corner and Howard is at it again; what an insult to the intelligence of the Australian people! I simply can't believe that here is a person who has refused to apologise to our indigenous people time and time again is now going all out to help the kids of our indigenous community. Until he was pushed,he didn't concede that "mandatory health checks" and payments being withdrawn etc, would also apply to the white community. Now, of course after being accused of racism, health checks are now NOT mandatory and this helps defray the potentially huge cost. What a snake!

If he is really geniune about helping these kids then why is their land up for grabs?
There is only one answer and that is he needs a site to place the future nuclear waste dumps but more immediate is the need for helping his mining and developer mates. Taking the land "on lease" for 5 years(!!) gives them enough time to carry out exploration as to the viability of carrying on with further "development". However, if it should prove to be a dud then the aboriginals get it back in the ruined state that mining companies are renowned for. However, if the sites prove to be viable then a leases will have to be compulsorily renewed so that the big rip-off can continue profitably. In any case by the time 5 years are over, Howard's nuclear energy mates (there are already approaches from nuclear energy interests to him but, of course, he has denied it several times on TV) will be sniffing around for a place to dump their highly toxic nuclear rubbish.

ALL STATE LEADERS, don't let Howard intimidate you anymore. You should make the rule as to what goes on in your state not Howard!

Just another in the long line of "Howardisms" - He is dedicated to dissolving Medicare because for for over 20 years he has hated it. He wants an American system whereby if you can't pay, you die. This is his next "step" if he is re-elected.

Shame. Howard shame..

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Sonya Jeffery
July 10th, 2007

If anyone doubts this is a land grab look at this article Headline - 'Give me land, lots of …' Oops, wrong lyrics:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/07/06/1183351452270.html

I would really like Getup to start a campaign to defend Aboriginal land rights against this attack!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Pam Edwards
July 12th, 2007

How did we expect Claire Martin,NT Govt, to change serious pedophile, social, alcohol, educational, and environmental issues among the Northern Territory residents, if it took the Federal Govt "to come in" with police, army, doctors, social workers, teachers, and politicians from all around Australia to intervene?
My friend was a Child Protection Worker for 7 years, and assures me if a child was "at risk",sometimes we removed the perpetrator and sometimes we removed the child, BUT NEVER, ever, did we remove THEIR land.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

judith gagg
July 12th, 2007

My concern is with the heavy handidness of howard's response. Please let there be respectfulness, consultation and inclusion of the indigenous communities' opinions.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Cassie Thornley
July 13th, 2007

The goverment's response to the problem is like kicking someone when they are down. To remove the small amount of tenuous control the Aboriginal people have over the land where they live is to remove their dignity and sense of control over their life. There is no quicker way to ensure that the present problems will be exacerbated.

What is needed is support and extension of the health and education facilities.
And, more than anything, to LISTEN to what the people the already doing to help themselves and support them.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Steve
July 15th, 2007

Anyone who thinks this is a land grab or about mining leases is fooling themselves. When will you people realise that you are the ones rapeing the children and abusing the women. You do gooders are misguided and generally do more harm than good. Come and live here for a while.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

No name
July 16th, 2007

Watch zeitgeist movie.com >this is an urgent mess. Who knows when they could pull this movie from the net. It runs for 2 hours.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Richard Bertoldo
July 16th, 2007

Everything this Government has done has had a hidden agenda. The problem with this sudden call to action makes me wonder what's in it for the Government. This is the very Government that slashed Government funding in all States and stopped the long term programs put into place by the State to address the problems. To blame the States for their inaction into fixing the Aboriginal problems seems to me very hypercritical.

What does the land they live on and rightfully own have to do with fixing the mess that successive Governments created for these people?

Does little Johny now need to be seen as a Do-Gooder because everything points towards his Party being kicked out. He has never done the Aborigines any favours, why all of sudden has he changed his attitude towards them?

Is it because he trying to demonstrate that the State Labour Parties are useless and the only Governmennt that can fix the problem is the current Federal Government with him as the Leader?

I learnt a very valuable lesson while I worked in retail. When it comes to bad service, people don't complain, they just don't come back! It appears that many people have seen 'Honest Johny' for what he really is, a manipulative, divisive politician who has mastered the art of wedge politics and deception.







Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

christinq morris
July 17th, 2007

The Howard Government's actions Re indigenous Australians has always been in my opion, shocking. This latest exploit I find stunning. In the Bulletin Mal Brough is cited as committed to indigenous Australia. "the whole issue is embedded in his soul - it's not political with Mal, it's personal". This doesn't relieve my dis-ease when "he counts among his supporters leading businesspeople in Melbourne and Sydney. People like Bails Myer of Melbourne's Myer dynasty, and Peter Coates, chairman of the Minerals Council and chief executive of Xstrata Coal. Queensland milliionaire businessman and legendary fundraiser believes in Mal Bough and believes emphatically that one day he will be the prime minister".

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Naomi Cartledge
July 20th, 2007

It goes without saying, that all decent people want the sexual abuse of children to be stopped, the perpetrators punished, and the children to receive adequate and appropriate counselling. The only people not in favour of this are those who are abusing children. However,just because I query the motives of Howard and Brough does not automatically mean, that I'm 'soft' on abusers.

From the very outset, John Howard has shown his attitude to women by either defunding or eliminating the relevant programs, in fact, the Office of the Status of women was removed, and only warranted being an attachment to the PM's office. There have been several 'talk fests' about the horrific levels of violence experienced by women and children, and the fact of a higher rate of abuse among indigenous communities has been widely recognized. Once the TV cameras left, and the media moved on to the next topic, nothing more was said, and even less was done.

The Northern Territory, Little Children Are Sacred report was the 13th such report of this nature, 3 of them instigated by the Federal Government, to no avail. The manner and actions undertaken by Howard and Brough are deliberately and dangerously at odds with the reccommendations of those who spent many compassionate and sensitive hours speaking to those directly involved by these traumas. They also took great pains to acknowledge, that there are 'white' people abusing and sexually assaulting indigenous children. We've heard not a mention of removing 50% of their incomes, or claiming their houses and lands. In fact, the recent case in NSW of a senior legal white person with horrific images of sexual assaults of children has not lost his home or land. Why the different set of standards? This leaves the government/s open to righteous claims of discrimination. Moreover, these vital pieces of information, and the necessary questioning and scrutiny should be welcomed not criticized; it's called living in a democracy.

There is enough information in the wider community, and certainly enough web sites and other facilities where people can be made aware of these challenging and disturbing facts. I totally reject the view, that by raising these anomolies, I'm just a 'do gooder' or that I'm demeaning the need to take the appropriate actions. I take this stand only AFTER reading and listening to those many wise and able elders, women and other caring people who are living in and with these horrific individual and community environments.

When Howard and Brough announced the actions that were to be adopted, I was rather intrigued as to why they mentioned that the communities including the land were to be reclaimed for 5 years. I just happen to have copies of the original Native Title Act, 1993, plus the Native Title Amendment Bills of 1996/97, and there it was - the Commonwealth can reclaim the land in blocks of 5 YEARS!!!!When it's considered, that unlike the rest of us, when aboriginal people give up their land for this time, they do not have automatic entitlement to reclaim it after that time. In other words, what is stopping any future Commonwealth government either extending those blocks of 5 years, or engaging legal representation in the High Court who would probably submit, that as the group/s had been away from their land for 5 years, they are unable to prove their stated relationship with it. I believe, that this is sufficient reason to at least pose the question as to Howard's motives, and with his past behaviour I have no faith in his integrity. If this is unfair, he only has himself to blame! Too many lies, too many times!

As a non-indigenous woman who voted "yes" in the 1967 Referendum, I am disgusted with the actions of the Howard government, but not surprised. The PM has shown many times, that he has no people skills, that he has no real concern for the pain and misery of others (indigenous neglect for 11 years, asylum seekers, Iraqi and Afghani peoples, domestic violence and child abuse and many, many others). Any person who is genuinely concerned for the plight of indigenous neglect, poor health, infant mortality rate(at least 3 times as high as the rest of the community)would want to adopt the 97 recommendations of the relevant report. Further, that he would want to consult with those directly concerned, and empower and include the communities in the solutions. But no, he sends in the military and police, and abuses and castigates anyone who disagrees with his actions. How about that for arrogance?

There are many wonderful elders, women and others in every community with heaps of knowledge and skills. Many have been doing amazing things that have proved to work, only to be denied further funding, or have had buildings in the community but no-one to work in them. These are not the actions of a committed government. The patriarchal and patronizing racist attitudes exhibited by Howard and Brough have not worked in any other country in the world, it only causes resentment and maybe even violent repercussions; a shameful and disgraceful position. I frequently cringe when I see patronizing exhibitions on the TV news, and wonder how bad it must get when the cameras are turned off.

If they are really fair dinkum, undertake to fix all the problems including health, housing, water, sewerage, schools, health workers, drug and alcohol counselling and ensure the peoples' involvement. Most importantly, LEAVE THEIR LAND ALONE and treat all perpetrators and victims alike regardless of skin colour or demographic - then I'll believe that their motives are ideal. It is an absolute crime, that after over 200 years, indigenous suffering and ill health is such a major issue. I feel ashamed, disgusted and angry at the persistent and consistent racist and discriminatory practices of successive governments. Perhaps one day, there'll be real leadership in Canberra, that will undertake to positively initiate a program against racism and towards empowerment, inclusiveness, and opportunity via education and fulfilling permanent employement. Anything less sould be unacceptable to us all!

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Kevin Arnold
July 20th, 2007

I have read quite a few of the messages on this site and most form the same opions as I do. Land grab.
John Howard is a complete political animal, his every thought and actions are based on obtaining and keeping power. He has lied and weedled his way to the top job without any thought of the good of anyone but himself and that which he supports. Mal Brough is the same type of person, all his utterances and actions point to ambitions higher than his present position.For most of Howard's political life he has opposed the Alice Springs to Darwin railroad.Suddenly we need one to open up the top end, native Australians need help, climate change is a reality, nuclear power is the answer. Oh, by the way, we have lots of uranium in Australia. No guesses as to where it all is.
While I am at it I would like to warn Noel Pearson that once he sides with this lot, no matter what his motives, they will use him and throw him aside as they always do. I see video of young Aboriginal children playing in pristine waters. I use to do this when I was young. It is all gone now, developed into town houses. Is that whant you want for your native lands. I think not, but you are falling into their hands.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Mr. G H Schorel-Hlavka
July 22nd, 2007

Keep in mind the following;
The following emails (in three parts) were forwarded to Mr. John Howard.
Due to the limit on volume of an email it had to be forwarded in three separate emails.
Part 1 of 3 parts
Mr. John Howard,
AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
John,
As a lawyer and so being an OFFICER OF THE COURT the very least anyone can expect from you is that your conduct is to observe what is legally appropriate and not that you, so to say, "TAKE THE LAW INTO YOUR OWN HANDS".
As a "constitutionalist" I would rather have seen you adhering to what is constitutionally appropriate then to ignore constitutional limitations, as it appears to me now you pursue.
Now doubt the Aboriginal issue regarding child abuse and other matters are very serious, but it must be addressed in a proper legal manner and not by some tyranny and/or dictatorship merely because you are facing a federal election and so need to get some attention for this.
To explain matters, I reproduced below an email I forwarded to Senator Lyn Ellison and will explain further matters.
As I have set out extensively in my already published books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series the USA Courts have extensively dealt with what constitute "RACSIM" and in fact the Framers of the Constitution used the issue of haircut for a Chinese prisoner as an example.
HANSARD 31-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
Mr. SOLOMON.-
We shall not only look to the Federal Judiciary for the protection of our interests, but also for the just interpretation of the Constitution:
HANSARD 8-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
Mr. HIGGINS.-I did not say that it took place under this clause, and the honorable member is quite right in saying that it took place under the next clause; but I am trying to point out that laws would be valid if they had one motive, while they would be invalid if they had another motive.
HANSARD 17-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
Mr. OCONNOR.-
We must remember that in any legislation of the Commonwealth we are dealing with the Constitution. Our own Parliaments do as they think fit almost within any limits. In this case the Constitution will be above Parliament, and Parliament will have to conform to it.
HANSARD 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
Mr. GORDON.-
The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on the Constitution we will have to wipe it out."
And
Mr. BARTON.-
The position with regard to this Constitution is that it has no legislative power, except that which is actually given to it in express terms or which is necessary or incidental to a power given.
Prior to the 1967 con-job referendum the States/Territories (Quasi States) had every right to legislate as to Aboriginals as they were excluded from the general legislative powers of the Commonwealth of Australia as a "coloured race". The Framers of the Constitution did extensively debate the Aboriginal issue and held this should be left with the States. Hence, the commonwealth of Australia in its sovereign rights, so to say, of a Territory could therefore legislate as to Aboriginals as any state could do. However, with the 1967 con-job referendum this changed.
As the Framers of the Constitution made clear that once the Commonwealth of Australia invoked its legislative powers within Section 51 then all State legislative powers no longer could be validly made. So to say, it was the end of legislative powers of any State Parliament (and so any Territory and the parliament – regardless if it was a special Territorian Parliament or the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.).
Prior to the 1967 con-job referendum the Federal parliament within its Section 122 powers could have legislated as to Aboriginals as it desired in regard of health, education, alcohol limitations, etc. However, the 1967 con-job referendum also excluded the Commonwealth of Australia this Section 122 powers as now the Commonwealth of Australia was bound by Section 51(xxvi) as the Framers of the Constitution did set out that the Commonwealth of Australia could only legislate as to any "coloured race" within subsection 51(xxvi) provided it was in regard of "special legislation" to a "particular" "coloured race". As such, for example the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders Act is unconstitutional as it relates to more then one race.
The Racial Discrimination Act 1975 is unconstitutional because it does not relate to a "specific race" but is against the "General Community" against which the Framers of the Constitution had made clear that Section 51xxvi) could not be used for.
Regretfully , despite my books calling ongoing for the creation of an OFFICE OF THE GUARDIAN, a constitutional council that advises the government, the people, the parliament and the Courts as to advise as to constitutional powers and limitations it has not eventuated and we are thereby continuing to have these absurd conducts of unconstitutional legislation, etc.
The issue is not if the Commonwealth of Australia can side step the Northern Territory government as I view it has every power to do so but it cannot sidestep the affects of the 1967 con-job referendum.
HANSARD 8-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
Mr. HIGGINS.-I did not say that it took place under this clause, and the honorable member is quite right in saying that it took place under the next clause; but I am trying to point out that laws would be valid if they had one motive, while they would be invalid if they had another motive.
Any State/Territory that were to legislate as to a specific race would by this make racist legislation to which it has no constitutional powers and hence it would be ULTRA VIRES.
Meaning, that if a State/Territory desires to deal with child abuse of Aboriginals it can do so only with legislation regarding any child within the State/Territory irrespective of them being Aboriginal or not. The moment it would be targeting a specific race it would be unconstitutional.
Hence, the Commonwealth of Australia cannot within section 122 sovereign rights invoke Subsection 51(xxvi) legislative powers as either it uses Section 122 legislative powers or Subsection 51(xxvi) legislative powers but not both.
Meaning, that the Commonwealth of Australia within its Section 122 sovereign powers cannot make any special legislation targeting Aboriginals as it would be unconstitutional.
The Commonwealth of Australia would however be able to legislate in regard of Aboriginals in matters such as health, education, alcohol, etc provided it legislate that is applicable to the Aboriginals as a "race" and so all Aboriginals, where ever in the Commonwealth of Australia are subjected to the same legislation.
Meaning, that if the legislation calls, so to say, that an Aboriginal must wash his hands before attending a class, then even adult Aboriginals attending University are bound by that law.
If the legislation was to make an exclusion zone for Aboriginals regarding pornography then this must apply to all Aboriginals throughout the Commonwealth. Section 51(xxvi) does not permit to exclude any Aboriginal from any draconic laws as they must at all times apply to all Aboriginals. This the Framers of the Constitution made clear was the intention!
While perhaps it might be beneath you to consult me perhaps because I am not a lawyer but a "constitutionalist" and an Attorney, then again I defeated previously the federal government lawyers on all constitutional issues I raised UNCHALLENGED. This, as lawyers may be trained to be a, so to say, "LAIR FOR HIRE" but it is another matter to understand and comprehend constitutional issues.
In my view REX WILD QC ought to have provided in his report the constitutional issues and problems associated with the Aboriginal issues and the minister who authorised the making of the report in my view ought to have at the very least advised Mr Rex Wild QC about my longstanding campaigns to deal with Aboriginals in a constitutional proper manner.
Sure, politically this might not have been desirable, but as you appear to make out that it should not be a political issue then why on earth was not any effort made to consult me?
My books have ongoing raised the Aboriginal issue and as such even, so to say, Blind Freddy would have been aware of what I was on about as a "constitutionalist".
In my view, you have not advanced the Aboriginal issue a bit by seeking to demonstrate, so to say, The hell with constitutional limitations as you are going to take the law into your own hands, as this is precisely the kind of conduct many others are doing when they are "taking the law into their own hands" to ignore the rule of law.
I understood of an interview Mr Rex Wild QC had on Channel 7 (Melbourne) 4.30 news report that he did not criticise the Northern Territory Government. Well, if this is so then why is it that you rather take the law into your own hands rather then to show to the general community that you rather observe constitutional constraints and will work within the constitutional framework.
The Northern Territory itself lacks any legislative powers that may be "racist" as the 1967 con-job referendum denies it to now legislate as to Aboriginals. Seems that the Commonwealth of Australia should have considered this bit before pushing before the 1967 con-job referendum!
Part 2 of 3
In my view, it doesn’t matter is the Northern Territory Government/ Parliament or the Commonwealth of Australia within its Section 122 sovereign powers deals with Aboriginals it must do so as part of the general community and not single out Aboriginals.
Hence, any legislation as to remove Aboriginals of their land rights would mean this applies to all Aboriginals throughout the Commonwealth of Australia! So, even lawyers/judges/politicians in Melbourne, Brisbane, Sydney, Adelaide, etc, would be subject to the same legislation and loose control of their properties, as the Commonwealth of Australia can only legislate within Subsection 51(xxvi) for this and then it must be in relation to all Aboriginals, regardless if they are judges/lawyers/politicians or unemployed Aboriginals.
You may desire to ignore this and not take aboard what I am stating but it may just backfire. Again, if you are going to get advise of lawyers "LAIRS FOR HIRE" rather then a "CONSTITUTIONALIST" like myself who is interested in the true application of CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS/LIMITATIONS then you are bound to make a fool of yourself time and again and worse abuse/misuse powers for which there will be no parliamentarian protection as neither does a police officer have who acts outside his function/legal powers.
I challenge you to prove me wrong in what I am stating, but again the federal Government lawyers previously failed in this miserably. You see, lawyers may know how to twist and turn the meaning of legislation but when they are faced with my arsenal of material of what the Framers of the Constitution stated then not only lack they any proper knowledge and understanding about this but they are unable to comprehend what it is about and so are defeated time and again.
While you may continue to ignore what I am stating, in the end you are causing untold harm to others, where as you could have avoided this. As such, your own grandeur, so to say, is taking the better of you and I view blocking your mental abilities to act in a proper lawful manner.
As an Author of books it makes my books, so to say, "juicy" where I can expose how despite of my writings you and others nevertheless ignored this and acted unconstitutional. As such, rather giving the example for people that they can take the law into their own hands, rather then to observe legal constrains.
You did so with the so-called WorkChoices legislation and my books expose why the judges had it so wrong. It is up to my Readers to consider if in light of what I exposed the judges, so to say, sold them out or otherwise betrayed them.
So, while you may go ahead with whatever unconstitutional legislation you plan, keep in mind that there could be a severe backlash by lawyers/judges/politicians and others if they suddenly find that they too are subjected to draconic laws which were intended to apply only to certain Aboriginals but turn out to be applicable against them also.
Rest assure I will expose this.
It should be understood that any State/Territorian Government (This includes the Commonwealth of Australia within its Section 122 of the Constitution powers) can deal with child abuse in a general manner, provided it does not single out specifically Aboriginals. As such, it appears to me that what you are doing is some grandstanding to purport to take charge about something, but doing it in a manner unconstitutional, as I understand you are pursuing with WATER and other matters.
Yet, you could achieve a lot more if just you had long ago accepted the creation of an OFFICE OF THE GUARDIAN, as to avoid any constitutional conflicts.
I will now quote also the EMAIL forwarded to Senator Lyn Allison;
QUOTE 21-6-2007 EMAIL
Senator Lyn Allison,
AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
Without seeking to make a long email of it, the Commonwealth of Australia within its powers of Section 122 cannot legislate specifically as to Aboriginals as the 1967 referendum transferred all such legislative powers to the Commonwealth of Australia where it only can legislate now as to Aboriginals as a "coloured race" with special legislation regarding all Aboriginals.
Hence, for example, if it desired to legislate that Aboriginals are not allowed to consume alcohol then it must relate to all Aboriginals regardless if they reside in the Northern Territories or in say Melbourne.
Neither can any State legislate as to Aboriginals as this powers was abolished when the Commonwealth of Australia began to legislate.
Hence, any legislation regarding specific Aboriginals would be unconstitutional.
My various books (available for sale on my website http://www.schorel-hlavka.com) sets this out extensively and as such no need for me to repeat the same. Likewise, the purported WorkChoices legislation, despite the High Court of Australia 14-11-2006 judgment is and remains unconstitutional. Again, my books set it all out extensively.
If the issue by the Federal Government is law enforcement "then it must itself not take the law into its own hands", so to say, but act within constitutional limitations, this however appears to me not being done!
Hansard 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
Sir EDWARD BRADDON.-And as in the case of wages, which necessarily vary according to varying conditions within a state, so it must be remembered that there are many other matters which are largely ruled and governed by local conditions. I see the matter just as strongly now as I did in Adelaide. I see that it is a matter which should be left to the adjudication of the states; and I would urge further that, by the interference of the Commonwealth Government in matters affecting the different states as to industrial disputes, there will be a probability, possibly more than a probability, of very serious friction arising between the Commonwealth and the states.
The following applies as much to Federal laws of the Commonwealth of Australia as it does to federal laws in the USA; http://familyguardian.tax-tactics.com/Subjects/LawAndGovt/ChallJurisdiction/AuthoritiesArticle/AuthOnJurisdiction.htm
37 Am Jur 2d at section 8 states, in part: "Fraud vitiates every transaction and all contracts. Indeed, the principle is often stated, in broad and sweeping language, that fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters, and that it vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments."
And
The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it. . .
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
Sixteenth American Jurisprudence
Second Edition, 1998 version, Section 203 (formerly Section 256)
Part 3 of 3
As to the recent Remuneration Tribunal politicians increases, it should be kept in mind that any legislation can only be constitutionally valid provide it provides for all parliamentarians the same payment. The Remunerations Tribunal cannot override constitutional embedded provisions. Again, my books deal with this extensively.
Ministers of the Crown can be paid additionally, as they are employed by the British Crown, Her Majesty Queen II, and the Constitution requires their salaries to be paid to the Queen. Noting to do with the Remuneration Tribunal!
The Australia Act 1986(UK) is invalid as it is not a constitution act and as such the British legislation falls within the European Union legislative provisions that there can be no racial discrimination, this Subsection 51(xxvi) provides for.
The Australia Act 1986(Cth) is unconstitutional as the Framers of the Constitution made clear that the Federal Parliament would have no powers to legislate as to the constitution. The moment you would allow for this then no longer have we a "constitutional Parliament" but a Parliament that is above the Constitution.
The Westminster Act was invalid in regard of the Commonwealth of Australia as it purported that the Commonwealth of Australia was as the dominions of Canada and New Zealand, where as it never was as it is no more but a "limited" "Political Union" as like the European Union.
There is a lot more to it but while as an Author I may have a field day of politicians/lawyers/judges make a mesh of it, as an Australian I prefer innocent victims not to have to suffer.
As I succeeded on 19 July 2006 on all constitutional issues raised by me UNCHALLENGED it ought to be clear that I defeated the federal government lawyers.
We should have an OFFICE OF THE GUARDIAN, a constitutional council that advises the Government, the People, the Parliament and the Courts as to constitutional powers and limitations rather then have political views dominating matters.
Getting back to Aboriginal issues, I do not doubt that you also will have grave concerns as to the plight of many Aboriginals, but some knee jerk political proposal that might just fit for election purposes hardly is the kind that those who suffer should be faced with.
When there is an Attorney-General who as Minister of Immigration could not even comprehend it was unconstitutional to deport Australians such as Vivian Alvarez Solon, and numerous others, then I hardly could expect any better sense from his, rather it appears to me he is bumbling along because few if any other politician knows better.
While I am aware that politicians may have the protection of Parliament "to vote as they like" nothing can protect them if afterwards they collect the monies which partly may have been unconstitutional as then they can face to be charged with fraud, and so Minister who, so to say, put their hands in the till of Consolidated Revenue, rather then to await their payment from the British Crown, as the Constitution provides for.
It is like a cashier at a store taking monies out of the till and rewarding herself with her pay rather then to leave it up to the employer to do so!
And, if parliamentarians and Ministers are acting within the Australia Act 1986 then they may just discover they have absolutely no parliamentarian protection/privileges as the Framers of the Constitution made clear that the Federal Parliament had no powers to legislate in regard of the constitution, and as such any legislation, such as the Australia Act 1986 would be ULTRA VIRES and so NULL AND VOID. Hence, parliamentarians better make up their mind as to under which constitution they are operating and if it is not the Australia Act 1986 then they better denounce it. Failing to do so may result that their membership to the Parliament in that regard is and remains to be unconstitutional, hence no constitutional protection/privileges as a Member of a House either.
For the record the High Court of Australia has no constitutional judicial powers to declare the Australia Act 1986 valid, but that is another long story.
Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka
107 Graham Road
Viewbank 3084
Ph/Fax 03-94577209
QUOTE 21-6-2007 EMAIL
In view of the above I urge you to reconsider matters and first ensure that what you intent to have done in regard of Aboriginals is constitutionally appropriate and valid and not might cause harm to Aboriginals not intended to be subjected to any draconic laws.
Keep in mind you cannot afterwards claim you didn’t know as I have provided you with this email and I do not run your office as to if this email is passed on to you or not as after all if you cannot even appropriately organise your own office then what on earth can you do properly?
It is your choice to make a fool of yourself or to perhaps seek to discover more about constitutional matters and show to be able to accept my views and then consider matters.
I am not particularly looking forwards of travelling, as my wife quite frankly doesn’t like doing so and as such, as I reside in Melbourne it would be better that if a meeting is needed this is arranged to take place in Melbourne.
Why not perhaps at the Office of Premier Steve Bracks and invite other Premiers and Chief Minister along so they all can discover some important issues regarding constitutional matters.
If the Aboriginal issue is truly important to you then I have no doubt you will arrange such a meeting, and why not also bring along your buddy Kevin Rudd? Seems to me he also is in "no mans land" where it comes to constitutional matters.
If you show no effort for a meeting then I take it that your comments are, so to say, mere "bulldust" not at all really concerned with the plight of Aboriginals and how to "lawfully" and appropriately deal with issues.
As I stated before, prove me wrong. Don’t rely upon what lawyers may claim, rather demand that they prove me wrong! And that is where so far they fail time and again!
Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka
107 Graham Road
Viewbank 3084
Ph/Fax 03-94577209

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Paulne Hancock
July 24th, 2007

John Howard and the current Federal Government have repeatedly demonstrated contempt, and a total lack of respect for indigenous Australians, even attempting to wipe their stories from our history,discrediting the report on the Stolen Generation, deliberatly undoing all the work achieved by the reconciliation movement. Who could forget the walk across the brige, and "sorry" in the sky.

The lowest act has to be using abused children as an excuse for stealing back their land,removing entry permits and revoking welfare payments - this will force them onto the fringe of rural towns (to fulfil mutual obligation) - enforced assimilation. Back to the 1950's(Howard's parallel universe).

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

TERENCE HOWISON
July 25th, 2007

Although, initially, the response seemed heavy handed; in truth it has been warmly received by the affected communities...especially, by the women of those communities who have been asking for increased policing for many years. The sensitivity and warmth of those soldiers, police and social workers involved in the surveys deserve warm praise and support. The real questions are where to after the surveys and health checks are completed ? Will the Federal Government give the Territory sufficient funds to proceed and is the Territory Government capable of carrying on the tasks.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

ged mac
July 26th, 2007

The plight of The Aboriginals is up to them. The white man cannot do it. But the white man can provide an parliament and a recoginition of 60,000 years of occupation.

It's Palestine again.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.


Denise Thompson
July 26th, 2007

GetUp has provided us with this BLOG, which has enabled concerned subscribers to voice their concerns that the current intervention in the Northern Territory is really about the winding back of Land Rights and the opening up of the Territory to mining, including uranium mining, and the development of a nuclear waste dump, out of sight, out of mind. That is all GetUp has done, and apparently is all that GetUp has the guts to do. To say I am disappointed is an understatement.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Andrea Ellis
August 1st, 2007

We are not naive Mr Howard, we see right through your apparent concern for the children. What we see is a politician who sees land and wants it, but due to the fact that it is their land he cannot have it so in with the troops and threats! If Howard was truly concerned for the children's welfare he would have done something about this issue 11 years ago, but no he waited until election time again! For 11 years Howard and Co have been regularly informed by people who actually work in the NT and in health that there are issues that need resolving; he chose to do nothing! Now he wants to play big brother and implement a paternalistic process which will do nothing to improve the lives of our Indigenous, may well infact make it worse, segregate and treat them as different citizens to the rest of Australia, and legally medically sexually assault children under 16 years. Child abuse is not the sole domain of the Indigenous it is very wide spread in the white community too but does he want to forcibly and invasively medically examine all under 16 year olds, no only the Aboriginals - this is discrimination at its highest. Why can't we, as many NTers have suggested over the years, open up a dialogue with all indiginous community leaders and have a bipartisan approach to eliminating/reducing these issues? Give them a voice, give them the power, educate and support them and watch their lives, over time, change for the better.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

max tanzer
August 7th, 2007

howard`s mob have been able to do these sort of things because they have spent the last 12 years stacking the high court with people of similar ethics and moral values as themselves - hence any legal challenges from states or territories will go down

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Jan Mahyuddin
August 10th, 2007

My cousin sent me the below, last night. We were in the NT and moving across the Kimberley as the Howard/Brough intervention began in June/July: a salutary experience.

Listen ... to the Mutitjulu people. Jan

Subject: Mutitjulu + Intervention bill could face international backlash: HREOC

Hazel Illin (9 August 20007) writes Re: media statement from Mutitjulu:

'Leaders of the Mutitjulu community today questioned the need for a military occupation of their small community. ‘We welcome any real support for indigenous health and welfare and even two police will assist, but the Howard Government declared an emergency at our community over two years ago - when they appointed an administrator to our health clinic - and since then we have been without a doctor, we have less health workers, our council has been sacked all our youth and health programmes have been cut. We have no CEO and limited social and health services. The government has known about our overcrowding problem for at least 10 years and they've done nothing about it. How do they propose keeping alcohol out of our community when we are 20 minutes away from 5 star hotel? Will they ban blacks from Yulara? We have been begging for an alcohol counsellor and a rehabilitation worker so that we can help alcoholics and substance abusers but those pleas have been ignored. What will happen to alcoholics when this ban is introduced? How will the government keep the grog runners out of our community without a permit system? We have tried to put forward projects to make our community economically sustainable - like a simple coffee cart at the sunrise locations - but the government refuses to even consider them. There is money set aside from the Jimmy Little foundation for a kidney dialysis machine at Mutitjulu, but National Parks won't let us have it. That would create jobs and improve indigenous health but they just keep stonewalling us. If there is an emergency, why won't Mal Brough fast
track our kidney dialysis machine? Some commentators have made much of the cluster of sexually transmitted diseases identified at our health clinic. People need to understand that Mutitjulu Health Clinic (now effectively closed) is a regional clinic and patients come from as far away as WA and SA; so to identify a cluster here is meaningless without seeing the confidential patient data. The fact that we hold this community together with no money, no help, no doctor and no government support is a miracle. Any community, black or white would struggle if they were denied the most basic resources. Police and the Military are fine for logistics and coordination but healthcare, youth services, education and basic housing are more
essential. Any programme must involve the people on the ground or it won't work. For example who will interpret for the military? Our women and children are scared about being forcibly examined; surely there is a need to build trust. Even the doctors say they are reluctant to examine a young child without a parent's permission. Of course any child that is vulnerable or at risk should be immediately protected but
a wholesale intrusion into our women and children's privacy is a violation of our human and sacred rights. Where is the money for all the essential services? We need long term financial and political commitment to provide the infrastructure and planning for our community. There is an urgent need for 10's of millions of dollars to do what needs to be done. Will Mr Brough give us a commitment beyond the police and military?
The commonwealth needs to work with us to put health and social services, housing and education in place rather than treating Mutitjulu
as a political football. But we need to set the record straight:
* There is no evidence of any fraud or mismanagement at Mutitjulu - we have had an administration for 12 months that found nothing
* Mal Brough and his predecessor have been in control of our community for at least 12 months and we have gone backwards in services
* We have successfully eradicated petrol sniffing from our community in conjunction with government authorities and oil companies
* We have thrown suspected paedophiles out of our community using the permit system which our government now seeks take away from us.
* We will work constructively with any government, State, Territory or Federal that wants to help aboriginal people. '

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Gail Mensinga
August 10th, 2007

I have read the plan to address the overall health crisis and some blog comments about how the communities felt they were dealing with suspected peadophilia in their communities with the permit system. Clearly moving peadophiles from one communikty to another is not effective.

I want to include a paper called Peadophilia Health Problem of the Decade which I presented to Corrections a few years back. The focus of the paper is to look at the impact of chilhood sexual assault to all children to show a significant health legal problem in all our communities.

My question is, Why are childhood sexual assault services not specifically in all child health plans for all Australian children and communities and broadened to be more than an issue for health and education. It is also an issue for our policing, our judiciary and parliament when constructing laws to attend to allegations of childhood sexual abuse. The laws are so paternalistic to the child victims persistently. No equality before the law there.

Hopefully this paper will educate some who are genuinely interested in our little chidren and see them as sacred and deserving of actual protection from this specific and substantial public health problem.
Here is the paper.

Effects of Child Sexual Abuse

Paedophilia: The Health Problem of the decade.

Dr Bill Glaser address to the paedophilia Conference hosted by the Australian Institute of Sydney 14 – 15 April 1997.

“Imagine a society afflicted by a scourge which struck down a quarter of its daughters and up to one in eight of its sons.

Imagine also that this plague, while not immediately fatal, lurked in the bodies and minds of these young children for decades, making them up to sixteen times more likely to experience its disastrous long-term effects.

Finally, imagine the nature of these effects: life threatening starvation, suicide, persistent nightmares, drug and alcohol abuse and a whole host of intractable psychiatric disorders requiring life-long treatment. What should that society’s response be?

The scourge we are speaking of is child sexual abuse. It has accounted for probably more misery and suffering than any of the great plagues of history, including the bubonic plague, tuberculosis and syphilis. Its effects are certainly more devastating and widespread than those of the modern –day epidemics, which currently take up so much community attention and resources: motor vehicle accidents, heart disease and, now AIDS. Yet the public response to child sexual abuse, even now, is fragmented, poorly coordinated and generally ill informed.


A massive public health problem like child sexual abuse demands a massive societal response. But firstly, we need to acknowledge
and understand the problem itself, and this is, sadly enough, a task which both professionals and the community have been reluctant to undertake, despite the glaringly obvious evidence in front of us.”

*Its victims have no National AIDS Council to advise governments on policy and research issues.

*They have no National Heart Foundation to promote public education as to the risks of smoking and unhealthy lifestyles.

*They do not have a Transport Accident Commission to provide comprehensive treatment and rehabilitation services for them.


Statistics

Anna Salter in Transforming Trauma (1995) asked:
What do we know about Sex offenders?
· Weinrott and Saylor (1991) studied an incarcerated sample of 37 rapists and 67 child molesters. The rapists were arrested 52 times and charged with 66 rapes. A further 433 rapes were self-reported. The 67 child molesters were known to have molested 136 victims. However, they admitted to more than 8,000 sexual contacts with 959 children.
· Freedman – Longo (1985) distributed anonymous questionnaires to 23 rapists and 30 child molesters in an institutional forensic mental health program. This sample of 53 men had more than 17,000 victims.
· The most comprehensive study by Abel et al; 1987 & Becker & Quinsey 1993, Donato et al; from Department of Community Services, South Australia has revealed the highest rates yet.

· This study indicated that the 561 subject offenders given a lengthy structural clinical interview “self reported an alarming total of 291,737 “paraphiliac acts” against 195,407 victims under the age of eighteen years of age.

A Subgroup of 377 of the 561 extrafamilial child molesters in the sample was responsible for 48,297 acts against 27,416 victims. Those who molested female children averaged 19.8 victims; those who molested male children averaged 150.2 victims. The 203 incest offenders in the group committed 15,668 acts against 361 victims.

Despite the evidence; To date the Government resources mostly focus on work with child sexual abuse interfamilial (incest).

Why?

This service provision has maintained assumptions like perpetuated some Legislative MLA’s [2002] “that incest stays in the family.”

Conte, Smith and Wolfe (1987) looked specifically at the characterises of paedophiles (definition that includes incest). Ages ranged from 20 to 66 years. 86% were repeat offenders. Those classified with Incest as their Primary Deviance all had Secondary Deviances: Rape, Hetero Child, Zoophilia, Paraphilia.

‘Even after multiple readings of the words of these adult sexual offenders, the impact of their words is not lessened. Their words describe a deliberate process which inflicts pain and other consequences on young children.’


These assumptions reflected by community leaders may serve as “mythical insulators” as described in Roland C Summit’s “Sexual Assaults Accommodation Syndrome.

This syndrome maintained that “the child faces secondary trauma in the crisis of discovery. Their attempts to reconcile their private experiences with the realities of the outer world are assaulted by the disbelief, blame and rejection they experience from adults. “…

Within this climate of prejudice, the sequential survival options available to the victim further alienate the child from any hope of outside credibility or acceptance.”

These discourses provide a false illusion that the Community is safe from predatory behaviour of the paedophiles.

This social construction have maintained Governments resources to be focussed toward managing incest or intrafamilial child sexual abuse and fails to integrate abuse inflicted by acquaintances or by strangers.

· Anna Salter in Transforming Trauma wonders “how something so malignant could be so silent.”


Haase & Kempe noted that “The assumption that children who are sexually abused outside of the family circle are not really traumatised and will soon forget it has served to perpetuate the lack of attention paid to these victims.” Studies of children abused by non-family perpetrators show these assumptions are invalid and grossly underestimate the importance and extent of the traumatisation for these children and their families including siblings.

· The Royal Commission into the NSW Police service Final Report ‘Paedophilia August 1997 identified:

“the victims of child sexual abuse are not confined to those children who are subject of notifications. Other victims include:
· The immediate family of the child.
· The immediate family of the alleged offender.
· The abused child who’s existence has not been disclosed.
· any person against whom an untrue allegation has been made; and
· the child who has not been abused but is treated as such.

Often the harm caused to these other victims is minimised or ignored. However, the reality of collateral harm to persons other than the child who has been abused should be recognised.

The possible existence of unidentified children who an offender has abused should also never be lost sight of since it is almost always the case that the offence, which comes to notice, is not the first or only offence.

Child sexual abuse is poorly understood and marginalised, to the individuals involved.

The above statistics indicates that this myth can no longer be maintained.


The Supreme Court of the United States of America Court of Appeal of California in Stogner v State of California (February 2003) looked specifically at research and the impact of child sexual abuse.

As cited in this case:

Molner et al studied the relationship between sexual abuse and a variety of psychological problems in a nationally representative sample of 6 000 Americans aged 15 to 54:
The authors acquired information about sexual abuse and about nineteen other ‘childhood adversities’, including parental mental disorders and family violence. “ After such potential confounders were adjusted for, there was still a strong, independent, statistically significant relationship between [childhood sexual abuse] and the majority of mood, anxiety, and substance disorders.;

Molner et al also found:

· Women who had been raped as children were almost four times more likely than non-victims to make a serious attempt at suicide than non-victims.

· Men who were raped as children were eleven times more likely to attempt suicide than non- victims.

We note Australia has an extremely high suicide ideation particularly among the young!

In the US Supreme Court Kendler et al, (2000) analysed report of from 1411 women averaging over 35 yrs of age and found significant increases in major depression, generalised anxiety disorders, alcohol dependence, and drug dependence among those who had been sexually abused as children even after controlling for family dysfunction and parental illness. – Victims were almost 5 times as likely as non-victims to suffer from multiple disorders.

Likewise:

Ferguson (1996) Identified disorders including major depression, anxiety disorders, conduct disorders, alcohol dependence, substance abuse, and suicide.

Dallam et al (2001) In a legal context, any harm is significant, particularly because those who seek legal intervention are those most likely to suffer harm. The population studies established that sexual abuse is associated with long-term harms and constitutes a serious public health problem.

The research justifies California’s efforts the redress the harm of childhood sexual abuse, regardless of when that abuse occurs.

This US case identified:

Child Molesters Often remain a threat to children throughout their lives

Prosecuting sex crimes committed against children years after they occurred is justified because child molesters often are repeat offenders.

It is safe to assume that their incarceration has prevented additional children from being abused.

Unlike most violent offenders, child molesters do not
Age out of criminality.

Studies with longer follow-up periods find substantially higher rates of recidivism, and reaffirm the fact that molesters pose long-term risks for reoffending.

Hanson et al [1993] identified the offenders ages were unrelated to their risk of recidivism, leading authors to conclude that ‘child molesters appear to be a significant risk of reoffending throughout their life.

We note, some jurisdictions take these crimes against children by adults seriously. Imposing life sentence. (End of paper)

Our Governments now want us to believe that these peadophiles have a health problem and are capable of being rehabilitated (at the publics expense) and allowed to remain in communities to have access to more children. Where is the law and order in that?.

References:

1. AMICI CURIAE Brief Stogner v State of California, Court of Appeal First Appellant District Supreme Court of United States, February 2003.


2. Humphries, C. Counselling and support issues for mothers and fathers of sexually abused children, Australian Social Work Journal, 1995, Vol 48, No 4.

3. Layton QC MS Robyn, The Report of Child Protection in South Australia entitled “Our best investment: A state Plan to Protect and Advance the Interests of Children” 26 March 2003.

4. MacFarlane Kee, Waterman Jill Sexual Abuse of Young Children, Guilford Press New York.1986.


5. Newberger Ed D, CM; Gremy, I M. MD; Waternaux C M, Ph D; Newberger E H, MD. Mother of Sexually Abuse Children: Trauma and Repair in Longitudinal Perspective. American Orthopsychiatric Association, Inc 1993.

6. Oates R. Kim, MD Understanding and managing Child Sexual Abuse, Harcourt Brace Jovanocich, Publishers, Sydney 1990.


7. Reid B, Cedar Cottage, Orientation Information for non offending parents who are mothers. 1999

8. Royal Commission into the New South Wales Police Service. “The paedophile Inquiry.” Final Report Volume V, August 1997)

9. Salter A C, Transforming Trauma A Guide to Understanding and Treating Adult Survivors of Chld Sexual Abuse. (1995) SAGE Publications





Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

John Wilson
August 12th, 2007

I think the whole thing is of great concern.
If he gets away with the war in NT. These criminals will then target welfare similarly. He has already has invaded the work force with his IR LAWS. If he found a loophole to control the NT he will find a way to bypass the premieres of all the other states and before long most of the country will be goose stepping and screaming Heil Howard.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Pamela Godsall-Smith
August 12th, 2007

Your comment- Why does your organisation and other opposition continually write about the Federal Governemnt (elected members of parliament, ministers and prime minister) as John Howard as if he is the onl person in Canberra. His ministers all have very well-educated experienced government servants advisingthem as well as any other agencies they consult. It makes me totally distrust your statements.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Adair Garrett
August 12th, 2007

It is commended that the government is considering the situation of Aboriginal people seriously but the process does definitely stink.

How would you like something to happen to you with NO CONSULTATION? This is totally unacceptable.

Looks like it really is time for a change of government! This is an unacceptable way to treat ANYONE let alone the indigenous people of this country.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.


Richard Faulder
August 12th, 2007

How could any compassionate person think that the Howard scheme will achieve long-term improvements in the lot of our First People. He needs to investigate the situation in white society, where child abuse and drug (including alchohol) addiction are far more effectively hidden.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Dr Jillene Harris
August 14th, 2007

I am disappointed at the Federal government’s intervention into the Northern Territory Indigenous communities. While it is important to protect children from abuse, it is also important for Indigenous people to have input into their own affairs. Not all indigenous people abuse their children, just as not all Australian’s of European and Asian decent abuse theirs. Equally just as a single roughly applied approach would not solve the problems of child abuse in the mainstream, it will not solve the problem in the Northern Territory. What is needed is consultation and an approach directed by the elders of each community. These are the rightful over seers of Indigenous child welfare.

Historically, the failure of governments to consult with indigenous people in forming policy and initiatives aimed to assist them has led to a waste of these valuable and limited resources. Exclusion of these people in decisions about their own affairs has been a major contributor to the current situation of many disempowered and disadvantaged people. This new Government intervention is only continuing a tradition that historically has been demonstrated to fail.

I request that the government consult with indigenous elders on the legislation to be put through parliament today. It is only with consultation, agreement and cooperation from elders that any plan has hope of long term success.

Dr Jillene Harris
Charles Sturt University
Bathurst NSW 2795

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

DENI LANGMAN
August 18th, 2007

Have you noticed the dead silence from the Politicians and the Media, on this issue, after the senate discussion on the Government Intervention in the Northern Territory, at the beginning of this week?
It is no coincodence that there is this silence.
I assume that Howard has now put out a "Gag Order" on the issue to the media and Politicians.
Kevin Rudd should be ashamed of himself to have supported Howard in taking away Aboriginal Land and culture.
It is doubtful that he will get my vote now.
For those of you who don't understand what a State of Emergency entails, allow me to explain some points.
Firstly , child sexual abuse does not constitute a State of Emergency in a particular State in Australia. Child Abuse is a shocking crime that must be dealt with by the law enforcement agencies (police and courts), but it is by no means a crime in the Northern Territory alone. It is all over Australia, so why haven't other States called a State of Emergency?
Secondly, Why hasn't the Central Council in Alice Springs, nor, the Northern Council in Darwin, ever called a State of Emergency? The answer is because there is NO STATE OF EMERGENCY. Yes there is child abuse but not only to Aboriginal children and not only by Aboriginals, that the local law enforcers, the police, should have clamped down on long before "The children are Sacred" report was done.
Thirdly, Why haven't the writers of THE CHILDREN ARE SACRED report been asked to attend the senate discussions on the issue?
Forthly, why were the writer's suggestions for actions to be taken been ignored completely?
Fifthly, Why werent the Community Elders included or informed of the legislation planning and why aren't they included in what actions are needed?
So, for Howard to call a State of Emergency now, is unconstitutional and the bringing in of Federal Police and Army is illegal and the legislative reforms accepted by the senate and Politicians are illegal.
How is it that in Australia in the 21st Century, Howard can do this and missuse his power so harmfully?
It is frightening to see this happening in Australia today. But the fact is , it IS HAPPENING and not one Politician and not one paper is helping to stop this disgrace.
Even the Governor General, who is Howard's mate, has kept quiet from the beginning, not even acknowleging the receipt of my 3 emails to him to please act to stop this carnage of Howard's.
I feel now in the deafening silence surrounding this issue and Howard's missuse of his power we have no other choice than to approach the International Courts, and possibely the UN bodies in order to find justice for the Indigenous people of the Northern Territory, and to bring Howard and Brough to justice for their inhumane treatment of the abused Aboriginal children for over 10 years, by ignoring the Elder's calls for help over that period.
I thank Get Up for all it's help so to the wonderful people who have written their supportive comments of the Communities in the Northern Territory.
I ask you to write to Kevin Rudd to tell him what you really think of his action on this issue.
He also must know he has made a most terrible mistake in supporting Howard and he must know what that mistake will cost the Communities and himself.
He has abused the faith and trust the Aborigines had in him and this now, he must face.
DENI.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

DENI LANGMAN
August 26th, 2007

Just heard on the Aboriginal talk programme on the radio, called "AWAYE", the Elders of the North/Western areas of Alice Springs, said that the Howard Government has already earmarked this Country for 4 nuclear waste dumping areas in the near future. So much so, that he has already placed the Army personell in these areas to"mark the spot".
The Elders are very angry that the rest of this country's Australians have done nothing to stop this happening.
Can we blame them???!!!
We "the Aussies who care", sit on our bums and watch the TV and do nothing, because we hope that the Government is REALLY DOING GOOD and doing something for the Child Sexually Abused.
I said it before and I say it again" where there is Sexual Abuse of Children, this is bad and must be dealt with, but is only an excuse and not at "State of Emergency" levels. Howard doesn't care a hoot for the Indigenous kids, nor does Brough, they are only keeping the story running cos it stops opposition to what they are REALLY doing.

WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!!! HOWARD IS DOING A LOT OF NO GOOD WHILE WE SIT AND WISH. HOWARD is putting his deadly plans into motion and we still sit and do nothing.
Let's get up and out onto the streets and tell Howard just what kind of murdering RACIST BARSTARD he really is.
Both Howard and Brough are liars and Racists, no less than their predesessors of the Stolen Generations times of the 1930s to 1970s, but even more so.
Howard has pulled the wool over everyone's eyes and is happily putting his murderous plans into action.
His Gov. Appointed Officials are sarcastic barstards who told the Elders at a meeting in Alice , not long ago that they "might want to move to the South/West Coastal areas" and, "Their houses are going to be housing for business people coming to the areas". (miners and their bosses!).

Now it is our turn to act people. Don't just sit there, join the others in protest during the APEC Summit. Get our numbers to the thousands and hundreds of thousands, to voice our opposition at what Howard is REALLY up to in the Northern Territory. TO HIS MURDERRING OF OUR ABORIGINAL CITIZENS, and STEALING OF THEIR COUNTRY FOR FINAB+NCIAL GAIN.
We cannot afford to sit any longer....call your favorite group who is organising demos at APEC. and join their protests NOW.
If the Governor General Maj. Gen. Michael Jeffery keeps quiet about Howard, WE MUST NOT.
Howard must not succeed in his dirty plan.
The Aborigenes are Australian citizens since 1967 and they deserve their Rights of Title to their Country and Right of determination and future for their children.
Howard's legislation is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Lets show them we REALLY care about them and lets get Howard and his Facsist murder mungers out of office NOW!
DENI.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

DENI LANGMAN
September 8th, 2007

VERY EARLY FEDERAL ELECTION.....MAKE SURE YOU ARE ENROLLED NOW......GO TO GET UP LAST NOTICE TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE ENROLLED (LINK THERE).

HOWARD MUST GO !!!!!!!
STOP HOWARD'S MURDEROUS PLAN TO WIPE OUT ABORIGINAL CULTURE!!!!!!
DENI.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

DENI LANGMAN
September 21st, 2007

In Parliament, yesterday's (Thurs. 20/09/07) senate question /answer time, brought the democrat senator for Tasmania, asking a question on expenditure by the Government in the NT.

The Government Senator in reply stated that millions here and millions there have been spent to improve the lives of the Indiginous Peoples of the NT.

Let's see if this improvement is true or false.

HOUSING: Instead of the houses the Community People live in today on Country the Government have built or plan to build Housing Department (council homes at low rent) housing for the Indigenous People away from Country.
THIS IS NOT AN IMPROVEMENT AND NOT ASKED FOR BY THE ELDERS OF THE COMMUNITIES. The Elders asked for larger houses for multi children families, NOT housing department buildings away from Country.

FINANCIALLY INDEPENDANT: The Government will train railway labourers to build the railways to bring miners to the Communities they intend to take and mining equipment for mining uranium and to transport the uranium for shipping to Russia and India and to transport the nuclear waste from the 25 nuclear reactors that Howard is bent on building in Australia, to be dumped on Aboriginal Country that the Elders are very much against and have told the Gov.Officials so.
The Gov. Officials were sarcastic in return and told the Elders that "business men" were going to live in their Communities and the Aborigines should move out and go live on the South West coast of Australia.
THIS IS NOT MAKING THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE FINANCIALLY INDEPENDANT , IT IS EXPLOITING THE INDIGINOUS PEOPLE AND GETTING CHEAP LABOUR FOR THE BUILDING OF THE NEEDED RAILWAY LINE. AND WHAT OF THE QUARENTINING OF 50% OF THEIR WAGES?! THE PEOPLE WILL BE FORCED TO LEAVE THEIR COUNTRY.
HOW CAN THEY BE FINANCIALLY INDEPENDANT WHEN THE GOV. TAKES AWAY HALF THEIR WAGES!!!??? AND WHO WILL LOOK AFTER THE DREAMING SITES AND THE SACRED SITES AND TEACH THE CHILDREN ABORIGINAL CULTIURE AND LANGUAGE?
IS THE GOVERNMENT ALSO QUARENTINING THE WHITE LABOURER'S WAGES?
THERE WAS NO TALK EVER OF TRAINING THE REST OF THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IN "RESPECTABLE" PROFFESSIONS LIKE NURSING, AMBULANCE WORKERS/VOLUNTEERS, MECHANICS, HELOCOPTER PILOTS FOR AMBULANCE HELICOPTERS,CARPENTERS, PLUMBERS, ELECTRICIANS, HEALTH WORKERS, ETC.
NO THIS IS NOT AN IMPROVEMENT!!!

THIS STATED "IMPROVEMENT" BY THE GOVERNMENT IS NOTHING THAN A BIG FAT LIE AND A COVER-UP OF WHAT THE HOWARD GOVERNMENT WITH HIS DEVOTED MINISTERS IS REALLY DOING IN THE NT.
DENI.


Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

DENI LANGMAN
September 22nd, 2007

On the issue of the Government Invasion of Aboriginal Communities in the NT., it is important to note that the Invasion has now spread to Queensland.

The Government said it intended to expand it's invasion to other states and on Thursday, 20/09/07 it was reported, the Government tried to take over a Community in Qld, but was stopped by a small group of Community People who were later joined by about 200 other Community People.

The Indiginous People know fully well that their resistance to Invasion could lead to bloodshed, but this knowledge didn't halt the resistance, the report said.
This report was from either the news on TV or from Message Stick, the Aboriginal Programme. I foreget which.
DENI.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

DENI LANGMAN
November 11th, 2007

I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE NEXT PM OF AUSTRALIA, BE IT JOHN HOWARD OR KEVIN RUDD, TO MAKE THE SECOND STANCE OF HIS NEW GOVERNMENT IN THE SIGNING OF THE UN RESOLUTION TO RECOGNISE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE'S RIGHTS.
THIS WOULD GIVE THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF AUSTRALIA THE RESPECT THEY DESERVE AND BEGIN TO MEND RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT PEOPLES OF AUSTRALIA AND THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES.
DENI.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

Marion
March 18th, 2008

How to improve the health of the population is well documented. It requires the political will of the three tiers of government. It means putting the people ahead of industry profit. World Health Organisation has 10 Social determinants of health;Policies to prevent people from falling into long term disadvantage.
1 People's social and economic circumstances strongly affect their health throughout life.
2. Stress.Social and psychological circumstances can cause long term stress. Continuing anxiety, insecurity, low self-esteem, social isolation and lack of control over work and home life have powerful effects on health. Such psychosocial risks accumulate during life and increase the poor mental health and premature death.
3.Early Life. Effects of early development last a life-time. A good start in life means supporting mothers from early pregnancy as well as young children.
4. Social Exclusion. Poverty, unemployment and homelessness creates misery and shortens life.
5. Stress in the workplace. Unsafe, unhealthy working conditions; having little control over one's work is strongly related to low back pain, sickness absence and cardiovascular disease.
6. Job security increases health, wellbeing and job satisfaction
7. Social Support. Friendships and social relations and strong supportive networks improve health at home, at work and in the community
8. Addiction. Individuals turn to alcohol, drugs, tobacco and gambling is influenced by the wider social setting.
9. Food. Healthy food is a political issue. Lack of public health representation and food industry interests is causing obesity, diabetes, cancer, degenerative eye diseases and dental caries.
10. Transport Healthy transport means reducing driving and encouraging more walking and cycling backed up by better public transport.

Reply to this comment...

Alias:
You can customise the name that will display beside your comment.
Email:
Your email is for our records and will not be displayed.
CAPTCHA:
Enter the text as it appears above to help us prevent spam.

Abusive, racist or expletive language won't be tolerated.
Note:
because you are not logged in, your post will be held until reviewed. We aim to review comments once each business day but during busy campaigning periods this is not always possible.

GetUp is Action for Australia

GetUp.org.au is an independent political movement to build a progressive Australia. GetUp! brings together like-minded people who want to bring participation back into our democracy.

Make a donation today!




© 2006-2008 GetUp! All rights reserved.
Authorised by Simon Sheikh, Level 5A, 116 Kippax St, Sydney NSW 2010